Cargando…

Cost-utility analysis of maintenance therapy with gemcitabine or erlotinib vs observation with predefined second-line treatment after cisplatin–gemcitabine induction chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC: IFCT-GFPC 0502-Eco phase III study

BACKGROUND: The IFCT-GFPC 0502 phase III study reported prolongation of progression-free survival with gemcitabine or erlotinib maintenance vs. observation after cisplatin–gemcitabine induction chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This analysis was undertaken to assess the i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Borget, Isabelle, Pérol, Maurice, Pérol, David, Lavolé, Armelle, Greillier, Laurent, Dô, Pascal, Westeel, Virginie, Crequit, Jacky, Léna, Hervé, Monnet, Isabelle, Le Caer, Hervé, Fournel, Pierre, Falchero, Lionel, Poudenx, Michel, Vaylet, Fabien, Chabaud, Sylvie, Vergnenegre, Alain, Zalcman, Gérard, Chouaïd, Christos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4302067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25511923
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-953
_version_ 1782353729340571648
author Borget, Isabelle
Pérol, Maurice
Pérol, David
Lavolé, Armelle
Greillier, Laurent
Dô, Pascal
Westeel, Virginie
Crequit, Jacky
Léna, Hervé
Monnet, Isabelle
Le Caer, Hervé
Fournel, Pierre
Falchero, Lionel
Poudenx, Michel
Vaylet, Fabien
Chabaud, Sylvie
Vergnenegre, Alain
Zalcman, Gérard
Chouaïd, Christos
author_facet Borget, Isabelle
Pérol, Maurice
Pérol, David
Lavolé, Armelle
Greillier, Laurent
Dô, Pascal
Westeel, Virginie
Crequit, Jacky
Léna, Hervé
Monnet, Isabelle
Le Caer, Hervé
Fournel, Pierre
Falchero, Lionel
Poudenx, Michel
Vaylet, Fabien
Chabaud, Sylvie
Vergnenegre, Alain
Zalcman, Gérard
Chouaïd, Christos
author_sort Borget, Isabelle
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The IFCT-GFPC 0502 phase III study reported prolongation of progression-free survival with gemcitabine or erlotinib maintenance vs. observation after cisplatin–gemcitabine induction chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This analysis was undertaken to assess the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of these strategies for the global population and pre-specified subgroups. METHODS: A cost-utility analysis evaluated the ICER of gemcitabine or erlotinib maintenance therapy vs. observation, from randomization until the end of follow-up. Direct medical costs (including drugs, hospitalization, follow-up examinations, second-line treatments and palliative care) were prospectively collected per patient during the trial, until death, from the primary health-insurance provider’s perspective. Utility data were extracted from literature. Sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The ICERs for gemcitabine or erlotinib maintenance therapy were respectively 76,625 and 184,733 euros per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Gemcitabine continuation maintenance therapy had a favourable ICER in patients with PS = 0 (52,213 €/QALY), in responders to induction chemotherapy (64,296 €/QALY), regardless of histology (adenocarcinoma, 62,292 €/QALY, non adenocarcinoma, 83,291 €/QALY). Erlotinib maintenance showed a favourable ICER in patients with PS = 0 (94,908 €/QALY), in patients with adenocarcinoma (97,160 €/QALY) and in patient with objective response to induction (101,186 €/QALY), but it is not cost-effective in patients with PS =1, in patients with non-adenocarcinoma or with stable disease after induction chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine- or erlotinib-maintenance therapy had ICERs that varied as a function of histology, PS and response to first-line chemotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4302067
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43020672015-01-22 Cost-utility analysis of maintenance therapy with gemcitabine or erlotinib vs observation with predefined second-line treatment after cisplatin–gemcitabine induction chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC: IFCT-GFPC 0502-Eco phase III study Borget, Isabelle Pérol, Maurice Pérol, David Lavolé, Armelle Greillier, Laurent Dô, Pascal Westeel, Virginie Crequit, Jacky Léna, Hervé Monnet, Isabelle Le Caer, Hervé Fournel, Pierre Falchero, Lionel Poudenx, Michel Vaylet, Fabien Chabaud, Sylvie Vergnenegre, Alain Zalcman, Gérard Chouaïd, Christos BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: The IFCT-GFPC 0502 phase III study reported prolongation of progression-free survival with gemcitabine or erlotinib maintenance vs. observation after cisplatin–gemcitabine induction chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This analysis was undertaken to assess the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of these strategies for the global population and pre-specified subgroups. METHODS: A cost-utility analysis evaluated the ICER of gemcitabine or erlotinib maintenance therapy vs. observation, from randomization until the end of follow-up. Direct medical costs (including drugs, hospitalization, follow-up examinations, second-line treatments and palliative care) were prospectively collected per patient during the trial, until death, from the primary health-insurance provider’s perspective. Utility data were extracted from literature. Sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The ICERs for gemcitabine or erlotinib maintenance therapy were respectively 76,625 and 184,733 euros per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Gemcitabine continuation maintenance therapy had a favourable ICER in patients with PS = 0 (52,213 €/QALY), in responders to induction chemotherapy (64,296 €/QALY), regardless of histology (adenocarcinoma, 62,292 €/QALY, non adenocarcinoma, 83,291 €/QALY). Erlotinib maintenance showed a favourable ICER in patients with PS = 0 (94,908 €/QALY), in patients with adenocarcinoma (97,160 €/QALY) and in patient with objective response to induction (101,186 €/QALY), but it is not cost-effective in patients with PS =1, in patients with non-adenocarcinoma or with stable disease after induction chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine- or erlotinib-maintenance therapy had ICERs that varied as a function of histology, PS and response to first-line chemotherapy. BioMed Central 2014-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4302067/ /pubmed/25511923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-953 Text en © Borget et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Borget, Isabelle
Pérol, Maurice
Pérol, David
Lavolé, Armelle
Greillier, Laurent
Dô, Pascal
Westeel, Virginie
Crequit, Jacky
Léna, Hervé
Monnet, Isabelle
Le Caer, Hervé
Fournel, Pierre
Falchero, Lionel
Poudenx, Michel
Vaylet, Fabien
Chabaud, Sylvie
Vergnenegre, Alain
Zalcman, Gérard
Chouaïd, Christos
Cost-utility analysis of maintenance therapy with gemcitabine or erlotinib vs observation with predefined second-line treatment after cisplatin–gemcitabine induction chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC: IFCT-GFPC 0502-Eco phase III study
title Cost-utility analysis of maintenance therapy with gemcitabine or erlotinib vs observation with predefined second-line treatment after cisplatin–gemcitabine induction chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC: IFCT-GFPC 0502-Eco phase III study
title_full Cost-utility analysis of maintenance therapy with gemcitabine or erlotinib vs observation with predefined second-line treatment after cisplatin–gemcitabine induction chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC: IFCT-GFPC 0502-Eco phase III study
title_fullStr Cost-utility analysis of maintenance therapy with gemcitabine or erlotinib vs observation with predefined second-line treatment after cisplatin–gemcitabine induction chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC: IFCT-GFPC 0502-Eco phase III study
title_full_unstemmed Cost-utility analysis of maintenance therapy with gemcitabine or erlotinib vs observation with predefined second-line treatment after cisplatin–gemcitabine induction chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC: IFCT-GFPC 0502-Eco phase III study
title_short Cost-utility analysis of maintenance therapy with gemcitabine or erlotinib vs observation with predefined second-line treatment after cisplatin–gemcitabine induction chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC: IFCT-GFPC 0502-Eco phase III study
title_sort cost-utility analysis of maintenance therapy with gemcitabine or erlotinib vs observation with predefined second-line treatment after cisplatin–gemcitabine induction chemotherapy for advanced nsclc: ifct-gfpc 0502-eco phase iii study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4302067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25511923
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-953
work_keys_str_mv AT borgetisabelle costutilityanalysisofmaintenancetherapywithgemcitabineorerlotinibvsobservationwithpredefinedsecondlinetreatmentaftercisplatingemcitabineinductionchemotherapyforadvancednsclcifctgfpc0502ecophaseiiistudy
AT perolmaurice costutilityanalysisofmaintenancetherapywithgemcitabineorerlotinibvsobservationwithpredefinedsecondlinetreatmentaftercisplatingemcitabineinductionchemotherapyforadvancednsclcifctgfpc0502ecophaseiiistudy
AT peroldavid costutilityanalysisofmaintenancetherapywithgemcitabineorerlotinibvsobservationwithpredefinedsecondlinetreatmentaftercisplatingemcitabineinductionchemotherapyforadvancednsclcifctgfpc0502ecophaseiiistudy
AT lavolearmelle costutilityanalysisofmaintenancetherapywithgemcitabineorerlotinibvsobservationwithpredefinedsecondlinetreatmentaftercisplatingemcitabineinductionchemotherapyforadvancednsclcifctgfpc0502ecophaseiiistudy
AT greillierlaurent costutilityanalysisofmaintenancetherapywithgemcitabineorerlotinibvsobservationwithpredefinedsecondlinetreatmentaftercisplatingemcitabineinductionchemotherapyforadvancednsclcifctgfpc0502ecophaseiiistudy
AT dopascal costutilityanalysisofmaintenancetherapywithgemcitabineorerlotinibvsobservationwithpredefinedsecondlinetreatmentaftercisplatingemcitabineinductionchemotherapyforadvancednsclcifctgfpc0502ecophaseiiistudy
AT westeelvirginie costutilityanalysisofmaintenancetherapywithgemcitabineorerlotinibvsobservationwithpredefinedsecondlinetreatmentaftercisplatingemcitabineinductionchemotherapyforadvancednsclcifctgfpc0502ecophaseiiistudy
AT crequitjacky costutilityanalysisofmaintenancetherapywithgemcitabineorerlotinibvsobservationwithpredefinedsecondlinetreatmentaftercisplatingemcitabineinductionchemotherapyforadvancednsclcifctgfpc0502ecophaseiiistudy
AT lenaherve costutilityanalysisofmaintenancetherapywithgemcitabineorerlotinibvsobservationwithpredefinedsecondlinetreatmentaftercisplatingemcitabineinductionchemotherapyforadvancednsclcifctgfpc0502ecophaseiiistudy
AT monnetisabelle costutilityanalysisofmaintenancetherapywithgemcitabineorerlotinibvsobservationwithpredefinedsecondlinetreatmentaftercisplatingemcitabineinductionchemotherapyforadvancednsclcifctgfpc0502ecophaseiiistudy
AT lecaerherve costutilityanalysisofmaintenancetherapywithgemcitabineorerlotinibvsobservationwithpredefinedsecondlinetreatmentaftercisplatingemcitabineinductionchemotherapyforadvancednsclcifctgfpc0502ecophaseiiistudy
AT fournelpierre costutilityanalysisofmaintenancetherapywithgemcitabineorerlotinibvsobservationwithpredefinedsecondlinetreatmentaftercisplatingemcitabineinductionchemotherapyforadvancednsclcifctgfpc0502ecophaseiiistudy
AT falcherolionel costutilityanalysisofmaintenancetherapywithgemcitabineorerlotinibvsobservationwithpredefinedsecondlinetreatmentaftercisplatingemcitabineinductionchemotherapyforadvancednsclcifctgfpc0502ecophaseiiistudy
AT poudenxmichel costutilityanalysisofmaintenancetherapywithgemcitabineorerlotinibvsobservationwithpredefinedsecondlinetreatmentaftercisplatingemcitabineinductionchemotherapyforadvancednsclcifctgfpc0502ecophaseiiistudy
AT vayletfabien costutilityanalysisofmaintenancetherapywithgemcitabineorerlotinibvsobservationwithpredefinedsecondlinetreatmentaftercisplatingemcitabineinductionchemotherapyforadvancednsclcifctgfpc0502ecophaseiiistudy
AT chabaudsylvie costutilityanalysisofmaintenancetherapywithgemcitabineorerlotinibvsobservationwithpredefinedsecondlinetreatmentaftercisplatingemcitabineinductionchemotherapyforadvancednsclcifctgfpc0502ecophaseiiistudy
AT vergnenegrealain costutilityanalysisofmaintenancetherapywithgemcitabineorerlotinibvsobservationwithpredefinedsecondlinetreatmentaftercisplatingemcitabineinductionchemotherapyforadvancednsclcifctgfpc0502ecophaseiiistudy
AT zalcmangerard costutilityanalysisofmaintenancetherapywithgemcitabineorerlotinibvsobservationwithpredefinedsecondlinetreatmentaftercisplatingemcitabineinductionchemotherapyforadvancednsclcifctgfpc0502ecophaseiiistudy
AT chouaidchristos costutilityanalysisofmaintenancetherapywithgemcitabineorerlotinibvsobservationwithpredefinedsecondlinetreatmentaftercisplatingemcitabineinductionchemotherapyforadvancednsclcifctgfpc0502ecophaseiiistudy
AT costutilityanalysisofmaintenancetherapywithgemcitabineorerlotinibvsobservationwithpredefinedsecondlinetreatmentaftercisplatingemcitabineinductionchemotherapyforadvancednsclcifctgfpc0502ecophaseiiistudy