Cargando…

An analysis of current treatment practice in uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinoma at two high volume cancer centers

OBJECTIVE: Despite the rarity of uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) and uterine clear cell carcinoma (UCCC), they contribute disproportionately to endometrial cancer deaths. Sufficient clinical information regarding treatment and prognosis is lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate trea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vogel, Tilley Jenkins, Knickerbocker, Abhay, Shah, Chirag A., Schiff, Melissa A., Isacson, Christina, Garcia, Rochelle L., Goff, Barbara A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4302281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25376917
http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2015.26.1.25
_version_ 1782353768382201856
author Vogel, Tilley Jenkins
Knickerbocker, Abhay
Shah, Chirag A.
Schiff, Melissa A.
Isacson, Christina
Garcia, Rochelle L.
Goff, Barbara A.
author_facet Vogel, Tilley Jenkins
Knickerbocker, Abhay
Shah, Chirag A.
Schiff, Melissa A.
Isacson, Christina
Garcia, Rochelle L.
Goff, Barbara A.
author_sort Vogel, Tilley Jenkins
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Despite the rarity of uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) and uterine clear cell carcinoma (UCCC), they contribute disproportionately to endometrial cancer deaths. Sufficient clinical information regarding treatment and prognosis is lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate treatment outcomes in a rare cancer cohort based on the experience at two tertiary care cancer centers. METHODS: Clinicopathologic data were retrospectively collected on 279 patients with UPSC and UCCC treated between 1995 to 2011. Mode of surgery, use of adjuvant treatment, and dissection of paraaoritc lymph nodes were evaluated for their association with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: 40.9% of patients presented with stage I disease, 6.8% of patients presented with stage II disease and 52.3% of patients presented with stages III and IV. Median follow-up was 31 months (range, 1 to 194 months). OS and PFS at 5 years were 63.0% and 51.9%, respectively. OS and PFS were not affected by mode of surgery (open vs. robotic approach; OS: hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28 to 1.62; PFS: HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.40 to 1.56). Adjuvant treatment was associated with improved OS in stages IB-II (HR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.78; p=0.026) but not in stage IA disease. There was no difference in OS or PFS based on the performance of a paraaoritc lymph node dissection. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive surgical staging appears a reasonable strategy for patients with non-bulky UPSC and UCCC and was not associated with diminished survival. Adjuvant treatment improved 5-year survival in stages IB-II disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4302281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43022812015-01-27 An analysis of current treatment practice in uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinoma at two high volume cancer centers Vogel, Tilley Jenkins Knickerbocker, Abhay Shah, Chirag A. Schiff, Melissa A. Isacson, Christina Garcia, Rochelle L. Goff, Barbara A. J Gynecol Oncol Original Article OBJECTIVE: Despite the rarity of uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) and uterine clear cell carcinoma (UCCC), they contribute disproportionately to endometrial cancer deaths. Sufficient clinical information regarding treatment and prognosis is lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate treatment outcomes in a rare cancer cohort based on the experience at two tertiary care cancer centers. METHODS: Clinicopathologic data were retrospectively collected on 279 patients with UPSC and UCCC treated between 1995 to 2011. Mode of surgery, use of adjuvant treatment, and dissection of paraaoritc lymph nodes were evaluated for their association with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: 40.9% of patients presented with stage I disease, 6.8% of patients presented with stage II disease and 52.3% of patients presented with stages III and IV. Median follow-up was 31 months (range, 1 to 194 months). OS and PFS at 5 years were 63.0% and 51.9%, respectively. OS and PFS were not affected by mode of surgery (open vs. robotic approach; OS: hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28 to 1.62; PFS: HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.40 to 1.56). Adjuvant treatment was associated with improved OS in stages IB-II (HR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.78; p=0.026) but not in stage IA disease. There was no difference in OS or PFS based on the performance of a paraaoritc lymph node dissection. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive surgical staging appears a reasonable strategy for patients with non-bulky UPSC and UCCC and was not associated with diminished survival. Adjuvant treatment improved 5-year survival in stages IB-II disease. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2015-01 2015-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4302281/ /pubmed/25376917 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2015.26.1.25 Text en Copyright © 2015. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Vogel, Tilley Jenkins
Knickerbocker, Abhay
Shah, Chirag A.
Schiff, Melissa A.
Isacson, Christina
Garcia, Rochelle L.
Goff, Barbara A.
An analysis of current treatment practice in uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinoma at two high volume cancer centers
title An analysis of current treatment practice in uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinoma at two high volume cancer centers
title_full An analysis of current treatment practice in uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinoma at two high volume cancer centers
title_fullStr An analysis of current treatment practice in uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinoma at two high volume cancer centers
title_full_unstemmed An analysis of current treatment practice in uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinoma at two high volume cancer centers
title_short An analysis of current treatment practice in uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinoma at two high volume cancer centers
title_sort analysis of current treatment practice in uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinoma at two high volume cancer centers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4302281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25376917
http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2015.26.1.25
work_keys_str_mv AT vogeltilleyjenkins ananalysisofcurrenttreatmentpracticeinuterinepapillaryserousandclearcellcarcinomaattwohighvolumecancercenters
AT knickerbockerabhay ananalysisofcurrenttreatmentpracticeinuterinepapillaryserousandclearcellcarcinomaattwohighvolumecancercenters
AT shahchiraga ananalysisofcurrenttreatmentpracticeinuterinepapillaryserousandclearcellcarcinomaattwohighvolumecancercenters
AT schiffmelissaa ananalysisofcurrenttreatmentpracticeinuterinepapillaryserousandclearcellcarcinomaattwohighvolumecancercenters
AT isacsonchristina ananalysisofcurrenttreatmentpracticeinuterinepapillaryserousandclearcellcarcinomaattwohighvolumecancercenters
AT garciarochellel ananalysisofcurrenttreatmentpracticeinuterinepapillaryserousandclearcellcarcinomaattwohighvolumecancercenters
AT goffbarbaraa ananalysisofcurrenttreatmentpracticeinuterinepapillaryserousandclearcellcarcinomaattwohighvolumecancercenters
AT vogeltilleyjenkins analysisofcurrenttreatmentpracticeinuterinepapillaryserousandclearcellcarcinomaattwohighvolumecancercenters
AT knickerbockerabhay analysisofcurrenttreatmentpracticeinuterinepapillaryserousandclearcellcarcinomaattwohighvolumecancercenters
AT shahchiraga analysisofcurrenttreatmentpracticeinuterinepapillaryserousandclearcellcarcinomaattwohighvolumecancercenters
AT schiffmelissaa analysisofcurrenttreatmentpracticeinuterinepapillaryserousandclearcellcarcinomaattwohighvolumecancercenters
AT isacsonchristina analysisofcurrenttreatmentpracticeinuterinepapillaryserousandclearcellcarcinomaattwohighvolumecancercenters
AT garciarochellel analysisofcurrenttreatmentpracticeinuterinepapillaryserousandclearcellcarcinomaattwohighvolumecancercenters
AT goffbarbaraa analysisofcurrenttreatmentpracticeinuterinepapillaryserousandclearcellcarcinomaattwohighvolumecancercenters