Cargando…
An analysis of current treatment practice in uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinoma at two high volume cancer centers
OBJECTIVE: Despite the rarity of uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) and uterine clear cell carcinoma (UCCC), they contribute disproportionately to endometrial cancer deaths. Sufficient clinical information regarding treatment and prognosis is lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate trea...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4302281/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25376917 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2015.26.1.25 |
_version_ | 1782353768382201856 |
---|---|
author | Vogel, Tilley Jenkins Knickerbocker, Abhay Shah, Chirag A. Schiff, Melissa A. Isacson, Christina Garcia, Rochelle L. Goff, Barbara A. |
author_facet | Vogel, Tilley Jenkins Knickerbocker, Abhay Shah, Chirag A. Schiff, Melissa A. Isacson, Christina Garcia, Rochelle L. Goff, Barbara A. |
author_sort | Vogel, Tilley Jenkins |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Despite the rarity of uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) and uterine clear cell carcinoma (UCCC), they contribute disproportionately to endometrial cancer deaths. Sufficient clinical information regarding treatment and prognosis is lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate treatment outcomes in a rare cancer cohort based on the experience at two tertiary care cancer centers. METHODS: Clinicopathologic data were retrospectively collected on 279 patients with UPSC and UCCC treated between 1995 to 2011. Mode of surgery, use of adjuvant treatment, and dissection of paraaoritc lymph nodes were evaluated for their association with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: 40.9% of patients presented with stage I disease, 6.8% of patients presented with stage II disease and 52.3% of patients presented with stages III and IV. Median follow-up was 31 months (range, 1 to 194 months). OS and PFS at 5 years were 63.0% and 51.9%, respectively. OS and PFS were not affected by mode of surgery (open vs. robotic approach; OS: hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28 to 1.62; PFS: HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.40 to 1.56). Adjuvant treatment was associated with improved OS in stages IB-II (HR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.78; p=0.026) but not in stage IA disease. There was no difference in OS or PFS based on the performance of a paraaoritc lymph node dissection. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive surgical staging appears a reasonable strategy for patients with non-bulky UPSC and UCCC and was not associated with diminished survival. Adjuvant treatment improved 5-year survival in stages IB-II disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4302281 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43022812015-01-27 An analysis of current treatment practice in uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinoma at two high volume cancer centers Vogel, Tilley Jenkins Knickerbocker, Abhay Shah, Chirag A. Schiff, Melissa A. Isacson, Christina Garcia, Rochelle L. Goff, Barbara A. J Gynecol Oncol Original Article OBJECTIVE: Despite the rarity of uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) and uterine clear cell carcinoma (UCCC), they contribute disproportionately to endometrial cancer deaths. Sufficient clinical information regarding treatment and prognosis is lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate treatment outcomes in a rare cancer cohort based on the experience at two tertiary care cancer centers. METHODS: Clinicopathologic data were retrospectively collected on 279 patients with UPSC and UCCC treated between 1995 to 2011. Mode of surgery, use of adjuvant treatment, and dissection of paraaoritc lymph nodes were evaluated for their association with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: 40.9% of patients presented with stage I disease, 6.8% of patients presented with stage II disease and 52.3% of patients presented with stages III and IV. Median follow-up was 31 months (range, 1 to 194 months). OS and PFS at 5 years were 63.0% and 51.9%, respectively. OS and PFS were not affected by mode of surgery (open vs. robotic approach; OS: hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28 to 1.62; PFS: HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.40 to 1.56). Adjuvant treatment was associated with improved OS in stages IB-II (HR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.78; p=0.026) but not in stage IA disease. There was no difference in OS or PFS based on the performance of a paraaoritc lymph node dissection. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive surgical staging appears a reasonable strategy for patients with non-bulky UPSC and UCCC and was not associated with diminished survival. Adjuvant treatment improved 5-year survival in stages IB-II disease. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2015-01 2015-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4302281/ /pubmed/25376917 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2015.26.1.25 Text en Copyright © 2015. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Vogel, Tilley Jenkins Knickerbocker, Abhay Shah, Chirag A. Schiff, Melissa A. Isacson, Christina Garcia, Rochelle L. Goff, Barbara A. An analysis of current treatment practice in uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinoma at two high volume cancer centers |
title | An analysis of current treatment practice in uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinoma at two high volume cancer centers |
title_full | An analysis of current treatment practice in uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinoma at two high volume cancer centers |
title_fullStr | An analysis of current treatment practice in uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinoma at two high volume cancer centers |
title_full_unstemmed | An analysis of current treatment practice in uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinoma at two high volume cancer centers |
title_short | An analysis of current treatment practice in uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinoma at two high volume cancer centers |
title_sort | analysis of current treatment practice in uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinoma at two high volume cancer centers |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4302281/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25376917 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2015.26.1.25 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vogeltilleyjenkins ananalysisofcurrenttreatmentpracticeinuterinepapillaryserousandclearcellcarcinomaattwohighvolumecancercenters AT knickerbockerabhay ananalysisofcurrenttreatmentpracticeinuterinepapillaryserousandclearcellcarcinomaattwohighvolumecancercenters AT shahchiraga ananalysisofcurrenttreatmentpracticeinuterinepapillaryserousandclearcellcarcinomaattwohighvolumecancercenters AT schiffmelissaa ananalysisofcurrenttreatmentpracticeinuterinepapillaryserousandclearcellcarcinomaattwohighvolumecancercenters AT isacsonchristina ananalysisofcurrenttreatmentpracticeinuterinepapillaryserousandclearcellcarcinomaattwohighvolumecancercenters AT garciarochellel ananalysisofcurrenttreatmentpracticeinuterinepapillaryserousandclearcellcarcinomaattwohighvolumecancercenters AT goffbarbaraa ananalysisofcurrenttreatmentpracticeinuterinepapillaryserousandclearcellcarcinomaattwohighvolumecancercenters AT vogeltilleyjenkins analysisofcurrenttreatmentpracticeinuterinepapillaryserousandclearcellcarcinomaattwohighvolumecancercenters AT knickerbockerabhay analysisofcurrenttreatmentpracticeinuterinepapillaryserousandclearcellcarcinomaattwohighvolumecancercenters AT shahchiraga analysisofcurrenttreatmentpracticeinuterinepapillaryserousandclearcellcarcinomaattwohighvolumecancercenters AT schiffmelissaa analysisofcurrenttreatmentpracticeinuterinepapillaryserousandclearcellcarcinomaattwohighvolumecancercenters AT isacsonchristina analysisofcurrenttreatmentpracticeinuterinepapillaryserousandclearcellcarcinomaattwohighvolumecancercenters AT garciarochellel analysisofcurrenttreatmentpracticeinuterinepapillaryserousandclearcellcarcinomaattwohighvolumecancercenters AT goffbarbaraa analysisofcurrenttreatmentpracticeinuterinepapillaryserousandclearcellcarcinomaattwohighvolumecancercenters |