Cargando…

Extracorporeal life support as bridge to lung transplantation: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Patients with acute respiratory failure requiring respiratory support with invasive mechanical ventilation while awaiting lung transplantation are at a high risk of death. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been proposed as an alternative bridging strategy to mechanical ven...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chiumello, Davide, Coppola, Silvia, Froio, Sara, Colombo, Andrea, Del Sorbo, Lorenzo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4302424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25774818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-014-0686-7
_version_ 1782353793438973952
author Chiumello, Davide
Coppola, Silvia
Froio, Sara
Colombo, Andrea
Del Sorbo, Lorenzo
author_facet Chiumello, Davide
Coppola, Silvia
Froio, Sara
Colombo, Andrea
Del Sorbo, Lorenzo
author_sort Chiumello, Davide
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Patients with acute respiratory failure requiring respiratory support with invasive mechanical ventilation while awaiting lung transplantation are at a high risk of death. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been proposed as an alternative bridging strategy to mechanical ventilation. The aim of this study was to assess the current evidence regarding how the ECMO bridge influences patients’ survival and length of hospital stay. METHODS: We performed a systematic review by searching PubMed, EMBASE and the bibliographies of retrieved articles. Three reviewers independently screened citation titles and abstracts and agreement was reached by consensus. We selected studies enrolling patients who received ECMO with the intention to bridge lung transplant. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case–control studies and case series with ten or more patients. Outcomes of interest included survival and length of hospital stay. Quantitative data summaries were made when feasible. RESULTS: We identified 82 studies, of which 14 were included in the final analysis. All 14 were retrospective studies which enrolled 441 patients in total. Because of the broad heterogeneity among the studies we did not perform a meta-analysis. The mortality rate of patients on ECMO before lung transplant and the one-year survival ranged from 10% to 50% and 50% to 90%, respectively. The intensive care and hospital length of stay ranged between a median of 15 to 47 days and 22 to 47 days, respectively. There was a general paucity of high-quality data and significant heterogeneity among studies in the enrolled patients and technology used, which confounded analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In most of the studies, patients on ECMO while awaiting lung transplantation also received invasive mechanical ventilation. Therefore, whether ECMO as an alternative, rather than an adjunction, to invasive mechanical ventilation is a better bridging strategy to lung transplantation still remains an unresolved issue. ECMO support as a bridge for these patients could provide acceptable one-year survival. Future studies are needed to investigate ECMO as part of an algorithm of care for patients with end-stage lung disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4302424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43024242015-01-23 Extracorporeal life support as bridge to lung transplantation: a systematic review Chiumello, Davide Coppola, Silvia Froio, Sara Colombo, Andrea Del Sorbo, Lorenzo Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Patients with acute respiratory failure requiring respiratory support with invasive mechanical ventilation while awaiting lung transplantation are at a high risk of death. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been proposed as an alternative bridging strategy to mechanical ventilation. The aim of this study was to assess the current evidence regarding how the ECMO bridge influences patients’ survival and length of hospital stay. METHODS: We performed a systematic review by searching PubMed, EMBASE and the bibliographies of retrieved articles. Three reviewers independently screened citation titles and abstracts and agreement was reached by consensus. We selected studies enrolling patients who received ECMO with the intention to bridge lung transplant. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case–control studies and case series with ten or more patients. Outcomes of interest included survival and length of hospital stay. Quantitative data summaries were made when feasible. RESULTS: We identified 82 studies, of which 14 were included in the final analysis. All 14 were retrospective studies which enrolled 441 patients in total. Because of the broad heterogeneity among the studies we did not perform a meta-analysis. The mortality rate of patients on ECMO before lung transplant and the one-year survival ranged from 10% to 50% and 50% to 90%, respectively. The intensive care and hospital length of stay ranged between a median of 15 to 47 days and 22 to 47 days, respectively. There was a general paucity of high-quality data and significant heterogeneity among studies in the enrolled patients and technology used, which confounded analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In most of the studies, patients on ECMO while awaiting lung transplantation also received invasive mechanical ventilation. Therefore, whether ECMO as an alternative, rather than an adjunction, to invasive mechanical ventilation is a better bridging strategy to lung transplantation still remains an unresolved issue. ECMO support as a bridge for these patients could provide acceptable one-year survival. Future studies are needed to investigate ECMO as part of an algorithm of care for patients with end-stage lung disease. BioMed Central 2015-01-22 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4302424/ /pubmed/25774818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-014-0686-7 Text en © Chiumello et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Chiumello, Davide
Coppola, Silvia
Froio, Sara
Colombo, Andrea
Del Sorbo, Lorenzo
Extracorporeal life support as bridge to lung transplantation: a systematic review
title Extracorporeal life support as bridge to lung transplantation: a systematic review
title_full Extracorporeal life support as bridge to lung transplantation: a systematic review
title_fullStr Extracorporeal life support as bridge to lung transplantation: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Extracorporeal life support as bridge to lung transplantation: a systematic review
title_short Extracorporeal life support as bridge to lung transplantation: a systematic review
title_sort extracorporeal life support as bridge to lung transplantation: a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4302424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25774818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-014-0686-7
work_keys_str_mv AT chiumellodavide extracorporeallifesupportasbridgetolungtransplantationasystematicreview
AT coppolasilvia extracorporeallifesupportasbridgetolungtransplantationasystematicreview
AT froiosara extracorporeallifesupportasbridgetolungtransplantationasystematicreview
AT colomboandrea extracorporeallifesupportasbridgetolungtransplantationasystematicreview
AT delsorbolorenzo extracorporeallifesupportasbridgetolungtransplantationasystematicreview