Cargando…

Prospective cross-sectional study on faecal immunochemical tests: sex specific cut-off values to obtain equal sensitivity for colorectal cancer?

BACKGROUND: Faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) are commonly used in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Diagnostic accuracy of FIT differs between males and females. This so far unexplained difference could result in a dissimilarity in screening outcome between both sexes. The aim of this study is to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Turenhout, Sietze T, Oort, Frank A, van der Hulst, René WM, Visscher, Arjen P, Terhaar sive Droste, Jochim S, Scholten, Pieter, Bouman, Anneke A, Meijer, Gerrit A, Mulder, Chris JJ, van Rossum, Leo GM, Coupé, Veerle MH
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4302436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25528043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-014-0217-7
_version_ 1782353796500815872
author van Turenhout, Sietze T
Oort, Frank A
van der Hulst, René WM
Visscher, Arjen P
Terhaar sive Droste, Jochim S
Scholten, Pieter
Bouman, Anneke A
Meijer, Gerrit A
Mulder, Chris JJ
van Rossum, Leo GM
Coupé, Veerle MH
author_facet van Turenhout, Sietze T
Oort, Frank A
van der Hulst, René WM
Visscher, Arjen P
Terhaar sive Droste, Jochim S
Scholten, Pieter
Bouman, Anneke A
Meijer, Gerrit A
Mulder, Chris JJ
van Rossum, Leo GM
Coupé, Veerle MH
author_sort van Turenhout, Sietze T
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) are commonly used in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Diagnostic accuracy of FIT differs between males and females. This so far unexplained difference could result in a dissimilarity in screening outcome between both sexes. The aim of this study is to compare sensitivity and specificity of a FIT between males and females, and study potential explanatory variables. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, data were prospectively collected. 3,022 subjects performed a FIT prior to complete colonoscopy. Sensitivity, specificity, and ROC curves were compared for both sexes. Potential explanatory variables of the relation between sensitivity and sex were explored. RESULTS: At all cut-off values, FIT sensitivity for CRC was higher (range 13-23%) and specificity was lower (range 2-4%) in males compared to females. At 75 ng/ml, sensitivity for CRC was 93% in males compared to 71% in females (p = 0.03), and specificity was 90% in males compared to 93% in females (p = <0.05). For advanced adenomas, males had a slightly higher sensitivity and lower specificity (not significant). At 75 ng/ml, sensitivity for advanced adenomas was 33% in males compared to 29% in females (p = 0.46), and specificity was 93% in males compared to 95% in females (p = 0.22). ROC curves were similar for both sexes, and equal combinations of sensitivity and specificity could be achieved by adjusting the cut-off values. For CRC, the difference in sensitivity could not be explained by age or location of the tumour. CONCLUSIONS: FIT has a higher sensitivity and a lower specificity for CRC in males than in females. Equal test characteristics can be achieved by allowing separate cut-off values for both sexes. Location and age do not explain the observed differences in sensitivity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12876-014-0217-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4302436
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43024362015-01-23 Prospective cross-sectional study on faecal immunochemical tests: sex specific cut-off values to obtain equal sensitivity for colorectal cancer? van Turenhout, Sietze T Oort, Frank A van der Hulst, René WM Visscher, Arjen P Terhaar sive Droste, Jochim S Scholten, Pieter Bouman, Anneke A Meijer, Gerrit A Mulder, Chris JJ van Rossum, Leo GM Coupé, Veerle MH BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) are commonly used in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Diagnostic accuracy of FIT differs between males and females. This so far unexplained difference could result in a dissimilarity in screening outcome between both sexes. The aim of this study is to compare sensitivity and specificity of a FIT between males and females, and study potential explanatory variables. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, data were prospectively collected. 3,022 subjects performed a FIT prior to complete colonoscopy. Sensitivity, specificity, and ROC curves were compared for both sexes. Potential explanatory variables of the relation between sensitivity and sex were explored. RESULTS: At all cut-off values, FIT sensitivity for CRC was higher (range 13-23%) and specificity was lower (range 2-4%) in males compared to females. At 75 ng/ml, sensitivity for CRC was 93% in males compared to 71% in females (p = 0.03), and specificity was 90% in males compared to 93% in females (p = <0.05). For advanced adenomas, males had a slightly higher sensitivity and lower specificity (not significant). At 75 ng/ml, sensitivity for advanced adenomas was 33% in males compared to 29% in females (p = 0.46), and specificity was 93% in males compared to 95% in females (p = 0.22). ROC curves were similar for both sexes, and equal combinations of sensitivity and specificity could be achieved by adjusting the cut-off values. For CRC, the difference in sensitivity could not be explained by age or location of the tumour. CONCLUSIONS: FIT has a higher sensitivity and a lower specificity for CRC in males than in females. Equal test characteristics can be achieved by allowing separate cut-off values for both sexes. Location and age do not explain the observed differences in sensitivity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12876-014-0217-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4302436/ /pubmed/25528043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-014-0217-7 Text en © van Turenhout et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
van Turenhout, Sietze T
Oort, Frank A
van der Hulst, René WM
Visscher, Arjen P
Terhaar sive Droste, Jochim S
Scholten, Pieter
Bouman, Anneke A
Meijer, Gerrit A
Mulder, Chris JJ
van Rossum, Leo GM
Coupé, Veerle MH
Prospective cross-sectional study on faecal immunochemical tests: sex specific cut-off values to obtain equal sensitivity for colorectal cancer?
title Prospective cross-sectional study on faecal immunochemical tests: sex specific cut-off values to obtain equal sensitivity for colorectal cancer?
title_full Prospective cross-sectional study on faecal immunochemical tests: sex specific cut-off values to obtain equal sensitivity for colorectal cancer?
title_fullStr Prospective cross-sectional study on faecal immunochemical tests: sex specific cut-off values to obtain equal sensitivity for colorectal cancer?
title_full_unstemmed Prospective cross-sectional study on faecal immunochemical tests: sex specific cut-off values to obtain equal sensitivity for colorectal cancer?
title_short Prospective cross-sectional study on faecal immunochemical tests: sex specific cut-off values to obtain equal sensitivity for colorectal cancer?
title_sort prospective cross-sectional study on faecal immunochemical tests: sex specific cut-off values to obtain equal sensitivity for colorectal cancer?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4302436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25528043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-014-0217-7
work_keys_str_mv AT vanturenhoutsietzet prospectivecrosssectionalstudyonfaecalimmunochemicaltestssexspecificcutoffvaluestoobtainequalsensitivityforcolorectalcancer
AT oortfranka prospectivecrosssectionalstudyonfaecalimmunochemicaltestssexspecificcutoffvaluestoobtainequalsensitivityforcolorectalcancer
AT vanderhulstrenewm prospectivecrosssectionalstudyonfaecalimmunochemicaltestssexspecificcutoffvaluestoobtainequalsensitivityforcolorectalcancer
AT visscherarjenp prospectivecrosssectionalstudyonfaecalimmunochemicaltestssexspecificcutoffvaluestoobtainequalsensitivityforcolorectalcancer
AT terhaarsivedrostejochims prospectivecrosssectionalstudyonfaecalimmunochemicaltestssexspecificcutoffvaluestoobtainequalsensitivityforcolorectalcancer
AT scholtenpieter prospectivecrosssectionalstudyonfaecalimmunochemicaltestssexspecificcutoffvaluestoobtainequalsensitivityforcolorectalcancer
AT boumanannekea prospectivecrosssectionalstudyonfaecalimmunochemicaltestssexspecificcutoffvaluestoobtainequalsensitivityforcolorectalcancer
AT meijergerrita prospectivecrosssectionalstudyonfaecalimmunochemicaltestssexspecificcutoffvaluestoobtainequalsensitivityforcolorectalcancer
AT mulderchrisjj prospectivecrosssectionalstudyonfaecalimmunochemicaltestssexspecificcutoffvaluestoobtainequalsensitivityforcolorectalcancer
AT vanrossumleogm prospectivecrosssectionalstudyonfaecalimmunochemicaltestssexspecificcutoffvaluestoobtainequalsensitivityforcolorectalcancer
AT coupeveerlemh prospectivecrosssectionalstudyonfaecalimmunochemicaltestssexspecificcutoffvaluestoobtainequalsensitivityforcolorectalcancer