Cargando…
Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation
In recent years, many new procedures and implants have been introduced as safer alternatives for the surgical treatment of glaucoma. The majority of these advances are implant-based with a goal of increased aqueous drainage to achieve lower intraocular pressure (IOP). In contrast, endoscopic cycloph...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4302471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25624669 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-9233.148344 |
_version_ | 1782353804938706944 |
---|---|
author | Seibold, Leonard K. SooHoo, Jeffrey R. Kahook, Malik Y. |
author_facet | Seibold, Leonard K. SooHoo, Jeffrey R. Kahook, Malik Y. |
author_sort | Seibold, Leonard K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In recent years, many new procedures and implants have been introduced as safer alternatives for the surgical treatment of glaucoma. The majority of these advances are implant-based with a goal of increased aqueous drainage to achieve lower intraocular pressure (IOP). In contrast, endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (ECP) lowers IOP through aqueous suppression. Although ciliary body ablation is a well-established method of aqueous suppression, the novel endoscopic approach presents a significant evolution of this treatment with marked improvement in safety. The endoscope couples a light source, video imaging, and diode laser to achieve direct visualization of the ciliary processes during controlled laser application. The result is an efficient and safe procedure that can achieve a meaningful reduction in IOP and eliminate or reduce glaucoma medication use. From its initial use in refractory glaucoma, the indications for ECP have expanded broadly to include many forms of glaucoma across the spectrum of disease severity. The minimally-invasive nature of ECP allows for easy pairing with phacoemulsification in patients with coexisting cataract. In addition, the procedure avoids implant or device-related complications associated with newer surgical treatments. In this review, we illustrate the differences between ECP and traditional cyclophotocoagulation, then describe the instrumentation, patient selection, and technique for ECP. Finally, we summarize the available clinical evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of this procedure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4302471 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43024712015-01-26 Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation Seibold, Leonard K. SooHoo, Jeffrey R. Kahook, Malik Y. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol Glaucoma Surgery Update In recent years, many new procedures and implants have been introduced as safer alternatives for the surgical treatment of glaucoma. The majority of these advances are implant-based with a goal of increased aqueous drainage to achieve lower intraocular pressure (IOP). In contrast, endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (ECP) lowers IOP through aqueous suppression. Although ciliary body ablation is a well-established method of aqueous suppression, the novel endoscopic approach presents a significant evolution of this treatment with marked improvement in safety. The endoscope couples a light source, video imaging, and diode laser to achieve direct visualization of the ciliary processes during controlled laser application. The result is an efficient and safe procedure that can achieve a meaningful reduction in IOP and eliminate or reduce glaucoma medication use. From its initial use in refractory glaucoma, the indications for ECP have expanded broadly to include many forms of glaucoma across the spectrum of disease severity. The minimally-invasive nature of ECP allows for easy pairing with phacoemulsification in patients with coexisting cataract. In addition, the procedure avoids implant or device-related complications associated with newer surgical treatments. In this review, we illustrate the differences between ECP and traditional cyclophotocoagulation, then describe the instrumentation, patient selection, and technique for ECP. Finally, we summarize the available clinical evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of this procedure. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4302471/ /pubmed/25624669 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-9233.148344 Text en Copyright: © Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Glaucoma Surgery Update Seibold, Leonard K. SooHoo, Jeffrey R. Kahook, Malik Y. Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation |
title | Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation |
title_full | Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation |
title_fullStr | Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation |
title_short | Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation |
title_sort | endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation |
topic | Glaucoma Surgery Update |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4302471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25624669 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-9233.148344 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT seiboldleonardk endoscopiccyclophotocoagulation AT soohoojeffreyr endoscopiccyclophotocoagulation AT kahookmaliky endoscopiccyclophotocoagulation |