Cargando…

Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation

In recent years, many new procedures and implants have been introduced as safer alternatives for the surgical treatment of glaucoma. The majority of these advances are implant-based with a goal of increased aqueous drainage to achieve lower intraocular pressure (IOP). In contrast, endoscopic cycloph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seibold, Leonard K., SooHoo, Jeffrey R., Kahook, Malik Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4302471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25624669
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-9233.148344
_version_ 1782353804938706944
author Seibold, Leonard K.
SooHoo, Jeffrey R.
Kahook, Malik Y.
author_facet Seibold, Leonard K.
SooHoo, Jeffrey R.
Kahook, Malik Y.
author_sort Seibold, Leonard K.
collection PubMed
description In recent years, many new procedures and implants have been introduced as safer alternatives for the surgical treatment of glaucoma. The majority of these advances are implant-based with a goal of increased aqueous drainage to achieve lower intraocular pressure (IOP). In contrast, endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (ECP) lowers IOP through aqueous suppression. Although ciliary body ablation is a well-established method of aqueous suppression, the novel endoscopic approach presents a significant evolution of this treatment with marked improvement in safety. The endoscope couples a light source, video imaging, and diode laser to achieve direct visualization of the ciliary processes during controlled laser application. The result is an efficient and safe procedure that can achieve a meaningful reduction in IOP and eliminate or reduce glaucoma medication use. From its initial use in refractory glaucoma, the indications for ECP have expanded broadly to include many forms of glaucoma across the spectrum of disease severity. The minimally-invasive nature of ECP allows for easy pairing with phacoemulsification in patients with coexisting cataract. In addition, the procedure avoids implant or device-related complications associated with newer surgical treatments. In this review, we illustrate the differences between ECP and traditional cyclophotocoagulation, then describe the instrumentation, patient selection, and technique for ECP. Finally, we summarize the available clinical evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of this procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4302471
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43024712015-01-26 Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation Seibold, Leonard K. SooHoo, Jeffrey R. Kahook, Malik Y. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol Glaucoma Surgery Update In recent years, many new procedures and implants have been introduced as safer alternatives for the surgical treatment of glaucoma. The majority of these advances are implant-based with a goal of increased aqueous drainage to achieve lower intraocular pressure (IOP). In contrast, endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (ECP) lowers IOP through aqueous suppression. Although ciliary body ablation is a well-established method of aqueous suppression, the novel endoscopic approach presents a significant evolution of this treatment with marked improvement in safety. The endoscope couples a light source, video imaging, and diode laser to achieve direct visualization of the ciliary processes during controlled laser application. The result is an efficient and safe procedure that can achieve a meaningful reduction in IOP and eliminate or reduce glaucoma medication use. From its initial use in refractory glaucoma, the indications for ECP have expanded broadly to include many forms of glaucoma across the spectrum of disease severity. The minimally-invasive nature of ECP allows for easy pairing with phacoemulsification in patients with coexisting cataract. In addition, the procedure avoids implant or device-related complications associated with newer surgical treatments. In this review, we illustrate the differences between ECP and traditional cyclophotocoagulation, then describe the instrumentation, patient selection, and technique for ECP. Finally, we summarize the available clinical evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of this procedure. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4302471/ /pubmed/25624669 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-9233.148344 Text en Copyright: © Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Glaucoma Surgery Update
Seibold, Leonard K.
SooHoo, Jeffrey R.
Kahook, Malik Y.
Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation
title Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation
title_full Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation
title_fullStr Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation
title_short Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation
title_sort endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation
topic Glaucoma Surgery Update
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4302471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25624669
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-9233.148344
work_keys_str_mv AT seiboldleonardk endoscopiccyclophotocoagulation
AT soohoojeffreyr endoscopiccyclophotocoagulation
AT kahookmaliky endoscopiccyclophotocoagulation