Cargando…

Difference in distribution profiles between CD163+ tumor-associated macrophages and S100+ dendritic cells in thymic epithelial tumors

BACKGROUND: In a number of human malignancies, tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are closely involved in tumor progression. On the other hand, dendritic cells (DCs) that infiltrate tumor tissues are involved in tumor suppression. However, there have been very few reports on the distribution profil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Omatsu, Mutsuko, Kunimura, Toshiaki, Mikogami, Tetsuya, Shiokawa, Akira, Nagai, Tomoko, Masunaga, Atsuko, Kitami, Akihiko, Suzuki, Takashi, Kadokura, Mitsutaka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4302590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25499804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13000-014-0215-7
_version_ 1782353831310393344
author Omatsu, Mutsuko
Kunimura, Toshiaki
Mikogami, Tetsuya
Shiokawa, Akira
Nagai, Tomoko
Masunaga, Atsuko
Kitami, Akihiko
Suzuki, Takashi
Kadokura, Mitsutaka
author_facet Omatsu, Mutsuko
Kunimura, Toshiaki
Mikogami, Tetsuya
Shiokawa, Akira
Nagai, Tomoko
Masunaga, Atsuko
Kitami, Akihiko
Suzuki, Takashi
Kadokura, Mitsutaka
author_sort Omatsu, Mutsuko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In a number of human malignancies, tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are closely involved in tumor progression. On the other hand, dendritic cells (DCs) that infiltrate tumor tissues are involved in tumor suppression. However, there have been very few reports on the distribution profiles of TAMs and DCs in thymic epithelial tumors. We examined the difference in the distribution profiles between TAMs and DCs in thymoma and thymic carcinoma. METHODS: We examined 69 samples of surgically resected thymic epithelial tumors, namely, 16 thymic carcinomas and 53 thymomas, in which we immunohistochemically evaluated the presence of TAMs using CD68 and CD163 as markers and DCs using S100 as the marker in tumor tissue samples in comparison with normal thymic tissues. RESULTS: The percentage of samples with a large number of CD68+ TAMs was not significantly different between thymic carcinoma and thymoma (7/16 versus 16/53, p = 0.904). However, the percentage of sample with a large number of CD163+ TAMs was significantly higher in thymic carcinoma than in thymoma (15/16 versus 34/53, p = 0.024). In contrast, the percentage of samples with a large number of S100+ DCs was significantly lower in thymic carcinoma than in thymoma (2/16 versus 23/53, p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to show a high percentage of CD163+ TAMs and a low percentage of S100+ DCs in thymic carcinoma samples, and our findings may provide an idea for future targeted therapeutic strategies for thymic carcinoma using antibodies that inhibit monocyte differentiation to TAMs, thereby skewing TAMs differentiation toward DCs. VIRTUAL SLIDES: The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/13000_2014_215
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4302590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43025902015-01-23 Difference in distribution profiles between CD163+ tumor-associated macrophages and S100+ dendritic cells in thymic epithelial tumors Omatsu, Mutsuko Kunimura, Toshiaki Mikogami, Tetsuya Shiokawa, Akira Nagai, Tomoko Masunaga, Atsuko Kitami, Akihiko Suzuki, Takashi Kadokura, Mitsutaka Diagn Pathol Research BACKGROUND: In a number of human malignancies, tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are closely involved in tumor progression. On the other hand, dendritic cells (DCs) that infiltrate tumor tissues are involved in tumor suppression. However, there have been very few reports on the distribution profiles of TAMs and DCs in thymic epithelial tumors. We examined the difference in the distribution profiles between TAMs and DCs in thymoma and thymic carcinoma. METHODS: We examined 69 samples of surgically resected thymic epithelial tumors, namely, 16 thymic carcinomas and 53 thymomas, in which we immunohistochemically evaluated the presence of TAMs using CD68 and CD163 as markers and DCs using S100 as the marker in tumor tissue samples in comparison with normal thymic tissues. RESULTS: The percentage of samples with a large number of CD68+ TAMs was not significantly different between thymic carcinoma and thymoma (7/16 versus 16/53, p = 0.904). However, the percentage of sample with a large number of CD163+ TAMs was significantly higher in thymic carcinoma than in thymoma (15/16 versus 34/53, p = 0.024). In contrast, the percentage of samples with a large number of S100+ DCs was significantly lower in thymic carcinoma than in thymoma (2/16 versus 23/53, p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to show a high percentage of CD163+ TAMs and a low percentage of S100+ DCs in thymic carcinoma samples, and our findings may provide an idea for future targeted therapeutic strategies for thymic carcinoma using antibodies that inhibit monocyte differentiation to TAMs, thereby skewing TAMs differentiation toward DCs. VIRTUAL SLIDES: The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/13000_2014_215 BioMed Central 2014-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4302590/ /pubmed/25499804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13000-014-0215-7 Text en © Omatsu et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Omatsu, Mutsuko
Kunimura, Toshiaki
Mikogami, Tetsuya
Shiokawa, Akira
Nagai, Tomoko
Masunaga, Atsuko
Kitami, Akihiko
Suzuki, Takashi
Kadokura, Mitsutaka
Difference in distribution profiles between CD163+ tumor-associated macrophages and S100+ dendritic cells in thymic epithelial tumors
title Difference in distribution profiles between CD163+ tumor-associated macrophages and S100+ dendritic cells in thymic epithelial tumors
title_full Difference in distribution profiles between CD163+ tumor-associated macrophages and S100+ dendritic cells in thymic epithelial tumors
title_fullStr Difference in distribution profiles between CD163+ tumor-associated macrophages and S100+ dendritic cells in thymic epithelial tumors
title_full_unstemmed Difference in distribution profiles between CD163+ tumor-associated macrophages and S100+ dendritic cells in thymic epithelial tumors
title_short Difference in distribution profiles between CD163+ tumor-associated macrophages and S100+ dendritic cells in thymic epithelial tumors
title_sort difference in distribution profiles between cd163+ tumor-associated macrophages and s100+ dendritic cells in thymic epithelial tumors
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4302590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25499804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13000-014-0215-7
work_keys_str_mv AT omatsumutsuko differenceindistributionprofilesbetweencd163tumorassociatedmacrophagesands100dendriticcellsinthymicepithelialtumors
AT kunimuratoshiaki differenceindistributionprofilesbetweencd163tumorassociatedmacrophagesands100dendriticcellsinthymicepithelialtumors
AT mikogamitetsuya differenceindistributionprofilesbetweencd163tumorassociatedmacrophagesands100dendriticcellsinthymicepithelialtumors
AT shiokawaakira differenceindistributionprofilesbetweencd163tumorassociatedmacrophagesands100dendriticcellsinthymicepithelialtumors
AT nagaitomoko differenceindistributionprofilesbetweencd163tumorassociatedmacrophagesands100dendriticcellsinthymicepithelialtumors
AT masunagaatsuko differenceindistributionprofilesbetweencd163tumorassociatedmacrophagesands100dendriticcellsinthymicepithelialtumors
AT kitamiakihiko differenceindistributionprofilesbetweencd163tumorassociatedmacrophagesands100dendriticcellsinthymicepithelialtumors
AT suzukitakashi differenceindistributionprofilesbetweencd163tumorassociatedmacrophagesands100dendriticcellsinthymicepithelialtumors
AT kadokuramitsutaka differenceindistributionprofilesbetweencd163tumorassociatedmacrophagesands100dendriticcellsinthymicepithelialtumors