Cargando…

Fatigue in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving sunitinib on an intermittent versus continuous dosing schedule in a randomized phase II trial

A phase II trial in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) found no benefit in efficacy or safety between patients receiving oral sunitinib 50 mg/day for 4 weeks followed by 2-week off-treatment (Schedule 4/2) and those receiving 37.5 mg continuous daily sunitinib. We hypothesized that fatigue would ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cella, David, Jensen, Sally E, Hahn, Elizabeth A, Beaumont, Jennifer L, Korytowsky, Beata, Bhattacharyya, Helen, Motzer, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4302685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25044922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.286
_version_ 1782353853975363584
author Cella, David
Jensen, Sally E
Hahn, Elizabeth A
Beaumont, Jennifer L
Korytowsky, Beata
Bhattacharyya, Helen
Motzer, Robert
author_facet Cella, David
Jensen, Sally E
Hahn, Elizabeth A
Beaumont, Jennifer L
Korytowsky, Beata
Bhattacharyya, Helen
Motzer, Robert
author_sort Cella, David
collection PubMed
description A phase II trial in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) found no benefit in efficacy or safety between patients receiving oral sunitinib 50 mg/day for 4 weeks followed by 2-week off-treatment (Schedule 4/2) and those receiving 37.5 mg continuous daily sunitinib. We hypothesized that fatigue would have a more variable “on-off” effect with the 4/2 schedule. A total of 292 patients completed two fatigue-related items on Days 1 and 29 of each treatment cycle. Mean absolute slopes were compared across treatments. A planned analysis of item “I feel fatigued” demonstrated that the mean absolute slope was greater in Schedule 4/2 compared to continuous dosing (0.042 vs. 0.032, P = 0.003), and analysis based on the change from Day 1 to Day 29 (0.52 vs. 0.21, P = 0.002) and, separately, Day 29 to the next Day 1 (−0.38 vs. −0.05, P < 0.001) showed the changes to be significantly larger in Schedule 4/2 than continuous dosing. “I have a lack of energy” showed a similar pattern graphically, however, the planned analysis was not statistically significant based on the absolute slopes but was when Day 1 to Day 29 and Day 29 to Day 1 changes were analyzed separately. The 4/2 arm was associated with a greater degree of variability in fatigue reflecting a possible “on-off” effect whereby patients receiving the 4/2 schedule reported less fatigue at the beginning of each cycle compared to Day 29. The findings can inform care for individuals with advanced RCC receiving intermittent dosing of sunitinib.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4302685
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43026852015-01-22 Fatigue in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving sunitinib on an intermittent versus continuous dosing schedule in a randomized phase II trial Cella, David Jensen, Sally E Hahn, Elizabeth A Beaumont, Jennifer L Korytowsky, Beata Bhattacharyya, Helen Motzer, Robert Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research A phase II trial in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) found no benefit in efficacy or safety between patients receiving oral sunitinib 50 mg/day for 4 weeks followed by 2-week off-treatment (Schedule 4/2) and those receiving 37.5 mg continuous daily sunitinib. We hypothesized that fatigue would have a more variable “on-off” effect with the 4/2 schedule. A total of 292 patients completed two fatigue-related items on Days 1 and 29 of each treatment cycle. Mean absolute slopes were compared across treatments. A planned analysis of item “I feel fatigued” demonstrated that the mean absolute slope was greater in Schedule 4/2 compared to continuous dosing (0.042 vs. 0.032, P = 0.003), and analysis based on the change from Day 1 to Day 29 (0.52 vs. 0.21, P = 0.002) and, separately, Day 29 to the next Day 1 (−0.38 vs. −0.05, P < 0.001) showed the changes to be significantly larger in Schedule 4/2 than continuous dosing. “I have a lack of energy” showed a similar pattern graphically, however, the planned analysis was not statistically significant based on the absolute slopes but was when Day 1 to Day 29 and Day 29 to Day 1 changes were analyzed separately. The 4/2 arm was associated with a greater degree of variability in fatigue reflecting a possible “on-off” effect whereby patients receiving the 4/2 schedule reported less fatigue at the beginning of each cycle compared to Day 29. The findings can inform care for individuals with advanced RCC receiving intermittent dosing of sunitinib. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2014-10 2014-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4302685/ /pubmed/25044922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.286 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Cella, David
Jensen, Sally E
Hahn, Elizabeth A
Beaumont, Jennifer L
Korytowsky, Beata
Bhattacharyya, Helen
Motzer, Robert
Fatigue in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving sunitinib on an intermittent versus continuous dosing schedule in a randomized phase II trial
title Fatigue in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving sunitinib on an intermittent versus continuous dosing schedule in a randomized phase II trial
title_full Fatigue in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving sunitinib on an intermittent versus continuous dosing schedule in a randomized phase II trial
title_fullStr Fatigue in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving sunitinib on an intermittent versus continuous dosing schedule in a randomized phase II trial
title_full_unstemmed Fatigue in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving sunitinib on an intermittent versus continuous dosing schedule in a randomized phase II trial
title_short Fatigue in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving sunitinib on an intermittent versus continuous dosing schedule in a randomized phase II trial
title_sort fatigue in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving sunitinib on an intermittent versus continuous dosing schedule in a randomized phase ii trial
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4302685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25044922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.286
work_keys_str_mv AT celladavid fatigueinpatientswithadvancedrenalcellcarcinomareceivingsunitinibonanintermittentversuscontinuousdosingscheduleinarandomizedphaseiitrial
AT jensensallye fatigueinpatientswithadvancedrenalcellcarcinomareceivingsunitinibonanintermittentversuscontinuousdosingscheduleinarandomizedphaseiitrial
AT hahnelizabetha fatigueinpatientswithadvancedrenalcellcarcinomareceivingsunitinibonanintermittentversuscontinuousdosingscheduleinarandomizedphaseiitrial
AT beaumontjenniferl fatigueinpatientswithadvancedrenalcellcarcinomareceivingsunitinibonanintermittentversuscontinuousdosingscheduleinarandomizedphaseiitrial
AT korytowskybeata fatigueinpatientswithadvancedrenalcellcarcinomareceivingsunitinibonanintermittentversuscontinuousdosingscheduleinarandomizedphaseiitrial
AT bhattacharyyahelen fatigueinpatientswithadvancedrenalcellcarcinomareceivingsunitinibonanintermittentversuscontinuousdosingscheduleinarandomizedphaseiitrial
AT motzerrobert fatigueinpatientswithadvancedrenalcellcarcinomareceivingsunitinibonanintermittentversuscontinuousdosingscheduleinarandomizedphaseiitrial