Cargando…

Collective screening tools for early identification of dyslexia

Current response to intervention models (RTIs) favor a three-tier system. In general, Tier 1 consists of evidence-based, effective reading instruction in the classroom and universal screening of all students at the beginning of the grade level to identify children for early intervention. Non-respond...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andrade, Olga V. C. A., Andrade, Paulo E., Capellini, Simone A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4304252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25667575
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01581
_version_ 1782354065833852928
author Andrade, Olga V. C. A.
Andrade, Paulo E.
Capellini, Simone A.
author_facet Andrade, Olga V. C. A.
Andrade, Paulo E.
Capellini, Simone A.
author_sort Andrade, Olga V. C. A.
collection PubMed
description Current response to intervention models (RTIs) favor a three-tier system. In general, Tier 1 consists of evidence-based, effective reading instruction in the classroom and universal screening of all students at the beginning of the grade level to identify children for early intervention. Non-responders to Tier 1 receive small-group tutoring in Tier 2. Non-responders to Tier 2 are given still more intensive, individual intervention in Tier 3. Limited time, personnel and financial resources derail RTI’s implementation in Brazilian schools because this approach involves procedures that require extra time and extra personnel in all three tiers, including screening tools which normally consist of tasks administered individually. We explored the accuracy of collectively and easily administered screening tools for the early identification of second graders at risk for dyslexia in a two-stage screening model. A first-stage universal screening based on collectively administered curriculum-based measurements was used in 45 7 years old early Portuguese readers from 4 second-grade classrooms at the beginning of the school year and identified an at-risk group of 13 academic low-achievers. Collectively administered tasks based on phonological judgments by matching figures and figures to spoken words [alternative tools for educators (ATE)] and a comprehensive cognitive-linguistic battery of collective and individual assessments were both administered to all children and constituted the second-stage screening. Low-achievement on ATE tasks and on collectively administered writing tasks (scores at the 25th percentile) showed good sensitivity (true positives) and specificity (true negatives) to poor literacy status defined as scores ≤1 SD below the mean on literacy abilities at the end of fifth grade. These results provide implications for the use of a collectively administered screening tool for the early identification of children at risk for dyslexia in a classroom setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4304252
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43042522015-02-09 Collective screening tools for early identification of dyslexia Andrade, Olga V. C. A. Andrade, Paulo E. Capellini, Simone A. Front Psychol Psychology Current response to intervention models (RTIs) favor a three-tier system. In general, Tier 1 consists of evidence-based, effective reading instruction in the classroom and universal screening of all students at the beginning of the grade level to identify children for early intervention. Non-responders to Tier 1 receive small-group tutoring in Tier 2. Non-responders to Tier 2 are given still more intensive, individual intervention in Tier 3. Limited time, personnel and financial resources derail RTI’s implementation in Brazilian schools because this approach involves procedures that require extra time and extra personnel in all three tiers, including screening tools which normally consist of tasks administered individually. We explored the accuracy of collectively and easily administered screening tools for the early identification of second graders at risk for dyslexia in a two-stage screening model. A first-stage universal screening based on collectively administered curriculum-based measurements was used in 45 7 years old early Portuguese readers from 4 second-grade classrooms at the beginning of the school year and identified an at-risk group of 13 academic low-achievers. Collectively administered tasks based on phonological judgments by matching figures and figures to spoken words [alternative tools for educators (ATE)] and a comprehensive cognitive-linguistic battery of collective and individual assessments were both administered to all children and constituted the second-stage screening. Low-achievement on ATE tasks and on collectively administered writing tasks (scores at the 25th percentile) showed good sensitivity (true positives) and specificity (true negatives) to poor literacy status defined as scores ≤1 SD below the mean on literacy abilities at the end of fifth grade. These results provide implications for the use of a collectively administered screening tool for the early identification of children at risk for dyslexia in a classroom setting. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4304252/ /pubmed/25667575 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01581 Text en Copyright © 2015 Andrade, Andrade and Capellini. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Andrade, Olga V. C. A.
Andrade, Paulo E.
Capellini, Simone A.
Collective screening tools for early identification of dyslexia
title Collective screening tools for early identification of dyslexia
title_full Collective screening tools for early identification of dyslexia
title_fullStr Collective screening tools for early identification of dyslexia
title_full_unstemmed Collective screening tools for early identification of dyslexia
title_short Collective screening tools for early identification of dyslexia
title_sort collective screening tools for early identification of dyslexia
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4304252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25667575
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01581
work_keys_str_mv AT andradeolgavca collectivescreeningtoolsforearlyidentificationofdyslexia
AT andradepauloe collectivescreeningtoolsforearlyidentificationofdyslexia
AT capellinisimonea collectivescreeningtoolsforearlyidentificationofdyslexia