Cargando…

Biological Diversity, Ecological Health and Condition of Aquatic Assemblages at National Wildlife Refuges in Southern Indiana, USA

Abstract. The National Wildlife Refuge system is a vital resource for the protection and conservation of biodiversity and biological integrity in the United States. Surveys were conducted to determine the spatial and temporal patterns of fish, macroinvertebrate, and crayfish populations in two water...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simon, Thomas P., Morris, Charles C., Robb, Joseph R., McCoy, William
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pensoft Publishers 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4304268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25632261
http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e4300
_version_ 1782354069652766720
author Simon, Thomas P.
Morris, Charles C.
Robb, Joseph R.
McCoy, William
author_facet Simon, Thomas P.
Morris, Charles C.
Robb, Joseph R.
McCoy, William
author_sort Simon, Thomas P.
collection PubMed
description Abstract. The National Wildlife Refuge system is a vital resource for the protection and conservation of biodiversity and biological integrity in the United States. Surveys were conducted to determine the spatial and temporal patterns of fish, macroinvertebrate, and crayfish populations in two watersheds that encompass three refuges in southern Indiana. The Patoka River National Wildlife Refuge had the highest number of aquatic species with 355 macroinvertebrate taxa, six crayfish species, and 82 fish species, while the Big Oaks National Wildlife Refuge had 163 macroinvertebrate taxa, seven crayfish species, and 37 fish species. The Muscatatuck National Wildlife Refuge had the lowest diversity of macroinvertebrates with 96 taxa and six crayfish species, while possessing the second highest fish species richness with 51 species. Habitat quality was highest in the Muscatatuck River drainage with increased amounts of forested habitats compared to the Patoka River drainage. Biological integrity of the three refuges ranked the Patoka NWR as the lowest biological integrity (mean IBI reach scores = 35 IBI points), while Big Oaks had the highest biological integrity (mean IBI reach score = 41 IBI points). The Muscatatuck NWR had a mean IBI reach score of 31 during June, which seasonally increased to a mean of 40 IBI points during summer. Watershed IBI scores and habitat condition were highest in the Big Oaks NWR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4304268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Pensoft Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43042682015-01-28 Biological Diversity, Ecological Health and Condition of Aquatic Assemblages at National Wildlife Refuges in Southern Indiana, USA Simon, Thomas P. Morris, Charles C. Robb, Joseph R. McCoy, William Biodivers Data J Taxonomic Paper Abstract. The National Wildlife Refuge system is a vital resource for the protection and conservation of biodiversity and biological integrity in the United States. Surveys were conducted to determine the spatial and temporal patterns of fish, macroinvertebrate, and crayfish populations in two watersheds that encompass three refuges in southern Indiana. The Patoka River National Wildlife Refuge had the highest number of aquatic species with 355 macroinvertebrate taxa, six crayfish species, and 82 fish species, while the Big Oaks National Wildlife Refuge had 163 macroinvertebrate taxa, seven crayfish species, and 37 fish species. The Muscatatuck National Wildlife Refuge had the lowest diversity of macroinvertebrates with 96 taxa and six crayfish species, while possessing the second highest fish species richness with 51 species. Habitat quality was highest in the Muscatatuck River drainage with increased amounts of forested habitats compared to the Patoka River drainage. Biological integrity of the three refuges ranked the Patoka NWR as the lowest biological integrity (mean IBI reach scores = 35 IBI points), while Big Oaks had the highest biological integrity (mean IBI reach score = 41 IBI points). The Muscatatuck NWR had a mean IBI reach score of 31 during June, which seasonally increased to a mean of 40 IBI points during summer. Watershed IBI scores and habitat condition were highest in the Big Oaks NWR. Pensoft Publishers 2015-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4304268/ /pubmed/25632261 http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e4300 Text en Thomas P. Simon, Charles C. Morris, Joseph R. Robb, William McCoy http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Taxonomic Paper
Simon, Thomas P.
Morris, Charles C.
Robb, Joseph R.
McCoy, William
Biological Diversity, Ecological Health and Condition of Aquatic Assemblages at National Wildlife Refuges in Southern Indiana, USA
title Biological Diversity, Ecological Health and Condition of Aquatic Assemblages at National Wildlife Refuges in Southern Indiana, USA
title_full Biological Diversity, Ecological Health and Condition of Aquatic Assemblages at National Wildlife Refuges in Southern Indiana, USA
title_fullStr Biological Diversity, Ecological Health and Condition of Aquatic Assemblages at National Wildlife Refuges in Southern Indiana, USA
title_full_unstemmed Biological Diversity, Ecological Health and Condition of Aquatic Assemblages at National Wildlife Refuges in Southern Indiana, USA
title_short Biological Diversity, Ecological Health and Condition of Aquatic Assemblages at National Wildlife Refuges in Southern Indiana, USA
title_sort biological diversity, ecological health and condition of aquatic assemblages at national wildlife refuges in southern indiana, usa
topic Taxonomic Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4304268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25632261
http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e4300
work_keys_str_mv AT simonthomasp biologicaldiversityecologicalhealthandconditionofaquaticassemblagesatnationalwildliferefugesinsouthernindianausa
AT morrischarlesc biologicaldiversityecologicalhealthandconditionofaquaticassemblagesatnationalwildliferefugesinsouthernindianausa
AT robbjosephr biologicaldiversityecologicalhealthandconditionofaquaticassemblagesatnationalwildliferefugesinsouthernindianausa
AT mccoywilliam biologicaldiversityecologicalhealthandconditionofaquaticassemblagesatnationalwildliferefugesinsouthernindianausa