Cargando…

Resident duty hours in Canada: a survey and national statement

Physicians in general, and residents in particular, are adapting to duty schedules in which they have fewer continuous work hours; however, there are no Canadian guidelines on duty hours restrictions. To better inform resident duty hour policy in Canada, we set out to prepare a set of recommendation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Masterson, Mark F, Shrichand, Pankaj, Maniate, Jerry M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4304289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25559388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-S1-S9
_version_ 1782354074201489408
author Masterson, Mark F
Shrichand, Pankaj
Maniate, Jerry M
author_facet Masterson, Mark F
Shrichand, Pankaj
Maniate, Jerry M
author_sort Masterson, Mark F
collection PubMed
description Physicians in general, and residents in particular, are adapting to duty schedules in which they have fewer continuous work hours; however, there are no Canadian guidelines on duty hours restrictions. To better inform resident duty hour policy in Canada, we set out to prepare a set of recommendations that would draw upon evidence reported in the literature and reflect the experiences of resident members of the Canadian Association of Internes and Residents (CAIR). A survey was prepared and distributed electronically to all resident members of CAIR. A total of 1796 eligible residents participated in the survey. Of those who responded, 38% (601) reported that they felt they could safely provide care for up to 16 continuous hours, and 20% (315) said that 12 continuous hours was the maximum period during which they could safely provide care (n = 1592). Eighty-two percent (1316) reported their perception that the quality of care they had provided suffered because of the number of consecutive hours worked (n = 1598). Only 52% (830) had received training in handover (n = 1594); those who had received such training reported that it was commonly provided through informal modelling. On the basis of these data and the existing literature, CAIR recommends that resident duty hours be managed in a way that does not endanger the health of residents or patients; does not impair education; is flexible; and does not violate ethical or legal standards. Further, residents should be formally trained in handover skills and alternative duty hour models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4304289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43042892015-02-12 Resident duty hours in Canada: a survey and national statement Masterson, Mark F Shrichand, Pankaj Maniate, Jerry M BMC Med Educ Review Physicians in general, and residents in particular, are adapting to duty schedules in which they have fewer continuous work hours; however, there are no Canadian guidelines on duty hours restrictions. To better inform resident duty hour policy in Canada, we set out to prepare a set of recommendations that would draw upon evidence reported in the literature and reflect the experiences of resident members of the Canadian Association of Internes and Residents (CAIR). A survey was prepared and distributed electronically to all resident members of CAIR. A total of 1796 eligible residents participated in the survey. Of those who responded, 38% (601) reported that they felt they could safely provide care for up to 16 continuous hours, and 20% (315) said that 12 continuous hours was the maximum period during which they could safely provide care (n = 1592). Eighty-two percent (1316) reported their perception that the quality of care they had provided suffered because of the number of consecutive hours worked (n = 1598). Only 52% (830) had received training in handover (n = 1594); those who had received such training reported that it was commonly provided through informal modelling. On the basis of these data and the existing literature, CAIR recommends that resident duty hours be managed in a way that does not endanger the health of residents or patients; does not impair education; is flexible; and does not violate ethical or legal standards. Further, residents should be formally trained in handover skills and alternative duty hour models. BioMed Central 2014-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4304289/ /pubmed/25559388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-S1-S9 Text en Copyright © 2014 Masterson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Masterson, Mark F
Shrichand, Pankaj
Maniate, Jerry M
Resident duty hours in Canada: a survey and national statement
title Resident duty hours in Canada: a survey and national statement
title_full Resident duty hours in Canada: a survey and national statement
title_fullStr Resident duty hours in Canada: a survey and national statement
title_full_unstemmed Resident duty hours in Canada: a survey and national statement
title_short Resident duty hours in Canada: a survey and national statement
title_sort resident duty hours in canada: a survey and national statement
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4304289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25559388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-S1-S9
work_keys_str_mv AT mastersonmarkf residentdutyhoursincanadaasurveyandnationalstatement
AT shrichandpankaj residentdutyhoursincanadaasurveyandnationalstatement
AT maniatejerrym residentdutyhoursincanadaasurveyandnationalstatement