Cargando…

Rare Cancers Europe (RCE) methodological recommendations for clinical studies in rare cancers: a European consensus position paper

While they account for one-fifth of new cancer cases, rare cancers are difficult to study. A higher than average degree of uncertainty should be accommodated for clinical as well as for population-based decision making. Rules of rational decision making in conditions of uncertainty should be rigorou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Casali, P. G., Bruzzi, P., Bogaerts, J., Blay, J.-Y., Aapro, M., Adamous, A., Berruti, A., Bressington, J., Bruzzi, B., Capocaccia, R., Cardoso, F., Celis, J. E., Cervantes, A., Ciardiello, F., Claussen, C., Coleman, M., Comis, S., Craine, S., De Boltz, D., De Lorenzo, F., Dei Tos, A. P., Gatta, G., Geissler, J., Giuliani, R., Grande, E., Gronchi, A., Jezdic, S., Jonsson, B., Jost, L., Keulen, H., Lacombe, D., Lamory, G., Le Cam, Y., Leto di Priolo, S., Licitra, L., Macchia, F., Margulies, A., Marreaud, S., McVie, G., Narbutas, S., Oliver, K., Pavlidis, N., Pelouchova, J., Pentheroudakis, G., Piccart, M., Pierotti, M. A., Pravettoni, G., Redmond, K., Riegman, P., Ruffilli, M. P., Ryner, D., Sandrucci, S., Seymour, M., Torri, V., Trama, A., Van Belle, S., Vassal, G., Wartenberg, M., Watts, C., Wilson, A., Yared, W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4304377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25274616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdu459
_version_ 1782354092720390144
author Casali, P. G.
Bruzzi, P.
Bogaerts, J.
Blay, J.-Y.
Aapro, M.
Adamous, A.
Berruti, A.
Blay, J.-Y.
Bogaerts, J.
Bressington, J.
Bruzzi, B.
Capocaccia, R.
Cardoso, F.
Casali, P. G.
Celis, J. E.
Cervantes, A.
Ciardiello, F.
Claussen, C.
Coleman, M.
Comis, S.
Craine, S.
De Boltz, D.
De Lorenzo, F.
Dei Tos, A. P.
Gatta, G.
Geissler, J.
Giuliani, R.
Grande, E.
Gronchi, A.
Jezdic, S.
Jonsson, B.
Jost, L.
Keulen, H.
Lacombe, D.
Lamory, G.
Le Cam, Y.
Leto di Priolo, S.
Licitra, L.
Macchia, F.
Margulies, A.
Marreaud, S.
McVie, G.
Narbutas, S.
Oliver, K.
Pavlidis, N.
Pelouchova, J.
Pentheroudakis, G.
Piccart, M.
Pierotti, M. A.
Pravettoni, G.
Redmond, K.
Riegman, P.
Ruffilli, M. P.
Ryner, D.
Sandrucci, S.
Seymour, M.
Torri, V.
Trama, A.
Van Belle, S.
Vassal, G.
Wartenberg, M.
Watts, C.
Wilson, A.
Yared, W.
author_facet Casali, P. G.
Bruzzi, P.
Bogaerts, J.
Blay, J.-Y.
Aapro, M.
Adamous, A.
Berruti, A.
Blay, J.-Y.
Bogaerts, J.
Bressington, J.
Bruzzi, B.
Capocaccia, R.
Cardoso, F.
Casali, P. G.
Celis, J. E.
Cervantes, A.
Ciardiello, F.
Claussen, C.
Coleman, M.
Comis, S.
Craine, S.
De Boltz, D.
De Lorenzo, F.
Dei Tos, A. P.
Gatta, G.
Geissler, J.
Giuliani, R.
Grande, E.
Gronchi, A.
Jezdic, S.
Jonsson, B.
Jost, L.
Keulen, H.
Lacombe, D.
Lamory, G.
Le Cam, Y.
Leto di Priolo, S.
Licitra, L.
Macchia, F.
Margulies, A.
Marreaud, S.
McVie, G.
Narbutas, S.
Oliver, K.
Pavlidis, N.
Pelouchova, J.
Pentheroudakis, G.
Piccart, M.
Pierotti, M. A.
Pravettoni, G.
Redmond, K.
Riegman, P.
Ruffilli, M. P.
Ryner, D.
Sandrucci, S.
Seymour, M.
Torri, V.
Trama, A.
Van Belle, S.
Vassal, G.
Wartenberg, M.
Watts, C.
Wilson, A.
Yared, W.
author_sort Casali, P. G.
collection PubMed
description While they account for one-fifth of new cancer cases, rare cancers are difficult to study. A higher than average degree of uncertainty should be accommodated for clinical as well as for population-based decision making. Rules of rational decision making in conditions of uncertainty should be rigorously followed and would need widely informative clinical trials. In principle, any piece of new evidence would need to be exploited in rare cancers. Methodologies to explicitly weigh and combine all the available evidence should be refined, and the Bayesian logic can be instrumental to this end. Likewise, Bayesian-design trials may help optimize the low number of patients liable to be enrolled in clinical studies on rare cancers, as well as adaptive trials in general, with their inherent potential of flexibility when properly applied. While clinical studies are the mainstay to test hypotheses, the potential of electronic patient records should be exploited to generate new hypotheses, to create external controls for future studies (when internal controls are unpractical), to study effectiveness of new treatments in real conditions. Framework study protocols in specific rare cancers to sequentially test sets of new agents, as from the early post-phase I development stage, should be encouraged. Also the compassionate and the off-label settings should be exploited to generate new evidence, and flexible regulatory innovations such as adaptive licensing could convey new agents early to rare cancer patients, while generating evidence. Though validation of surrogate end points is problematic in rare cancers, the use of an updated notion of tumor response may be of great value in the single patient to optimize the use of therapies, all the more the new ones. Disease-based communities, involving clinicians and patients, should be regularly consulted by regulatory bodies when setting their policies on drug approval and reimbursement in specific rare cancers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4304377
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43043772015-02-24 Rare Cancers Europe (RCE) methodological recommendations for clinical studies in rare cancers: a European consensus position paper Casali, P. G. Bruzzi, P. Bogaerts, J. Blay, J.-Y. Aapro, M. Adamous, A. Berruti, A. Blay, J.-Y. Bogaerts, J. Bressington, J. Bruzzi, B. Capocaccia, R. Cardoso, F. Casali, P. G. Celis, J. E. Cervantes, A. Ciardiello, F. Claussen, C. Coleman, M. Comis, S. Craine, S. De Boltz, D. De Lorenzo, F. Dei Tos, A. P. Gatta, G. Geissler, J. Giuliani, R. Grande, E. Gronchi, A. Jezdic, S. Jonsson, B. Jost, L. Keulen, H. Lacombe, D. Lamory, G. Le Cam, Y. Leto di Priolo, S. Licitra, L. Macchia, F. Margulies, A. Marreaud, S. McVie, G. Narbutas, S. Oliver, K. Pavlidis, N. Pelouchova, J. Pentheroudakis, G. Piccart, M. Pierotti, M. A. Pravettoni, G. Redmond, K. Riegman, P. Ruffilli, M. P. Ryner, D. Sandrucci, S. Seymour, M. Torri, V. Trama, A. Van Belle, S. Vassal, G. Wartenberg, M. Watts, C. Wilson, A. Yared, W. Ann Oncol Reviews While they account for one-fifth of new cancer cases, rare cancers are difficult to study. A higher than average degree of uncertainty should be accommodated for clinical as well as for population-based decision making. Rules of rational decision making in conditions of uncertainty should be rigorously followed and would need widely informative clinical trials. In principle, any piece of new evidence would need to be exploited in rare cancers. Methodologies to explicitly weigh and combine all the available evidence should be refined, and the Bayesian logic can be instrumental to this end. Likewise, Bayesian-design trials may help optimize the low number of patients liable to be enrolled in clinical studies on rare cancers, as well as adaptive trials in general, with their inherent potential of flexibility when properly applied. While clinical studies are the mainstay to test hypotheses, the potential of electronic patient records should be exploited to generate new hypotheses, to create external controls for future studies (when internal controls are unpractical), to study effectiveness of new treatments in real conditions. Framework study protocols in specific rare cancers to sequentially test sets of new agents, as from the early post-phase I development stage, should be encouraged. Also the compassionate and the off-label settings should be exploited to generate new evidence, and flexible regulatory innovations such as adaptive licensing could convey new agents early to rare cancer patients, while generating evidence. Though validation of surrogate end points is problematic in rare cancers, the use of an updated notion of tumor response may be of great value in the single patient to optimize the use of therapies, all the more the new ones. Disease-based communities, involving clinicians and patients, should be regularly consulted by regulatory bodies when setting their policies on drug approval and reimbursement in specific rare cancers. Oxford University Press 2015-02 2014-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4304377/ /pubmed/25274616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdu459 Text en © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Reviews
Casali, P. G.
Bruzzi, P.
Bogaerts, J.
Blay, J.-Y.
Aapro, M.
Adamous, A.
Berruti, A.
Blay, J.-Y.
Bogaerts, J.
Bressington, J.
Bruzzi, B.
Capocaccia, R.
Cardoso, F.
Casali, P. G.
Celis, J. E.
Cervantes, A.
Ciardiello, F.
Claussen, C.
Coleman, M.
Comis, S.
Craine, S.
De Boltz, D.
De Lorenzo, F.
Dei Tos, A. P.
Gatta, G.
Geissler, J.
Giuliani, R.
Grande, E.
Gronchi, A.
Jezdic, S.
Jonsson, B.
Jost, L.
Keulen, H.
Lacombe, D.
Lamory, G.
Le Cam, Y.
Leto di Priolo, S.
Licitra, L.
Macchia, F.
Margulies, A.
Marreaud, S.
McVie, G.
Narbutas, S.
Oliver, K.
Pavlidis, N.
Pelouchova, J.
Pentheroudakis, G.
Piccart, M.
Pierotti, M. A.
Pravettoni, G.
Redmond, K.
Riegman, P.
Ruffilli, M. P.
Ryner, D.
Sandrucci, S.
Seymour, M.
Torri, V.
Trama, A.
Van Belle, S.
Vassal, G.
Wartenberg, M.
Watts, C.
Wilson, A.
Yared, W.
Rare Cancers Europe (RCE) methodological recommendations for clinical studies in rare cancers: a European consensus position paper
title Rare Cancers Europe (RCE) methodological recommendations for clinical studies in rare cancers: a European consensus position paper
title_full Rare Cancers Europe (RCE) methodological recommendations for clinical studies in rare cancers: a European consensus position paper
title_fullStr Rare Cancers Europe (RCE) methodological recommendations for clinical studies in rare cancers: a European consensus position paper
title_full_unstemmed Rare Cancers Europe (RCE) methodological recommendations for clinical studies in rare cancers: a European consensus position paper
title_short Rare Cancers Europe (RCE) methodological recommendations for clinical studies in rare cancers: a European consensus position paper
title_sort rare cancers europe (rce) methodological recommendations for clinical studies in rare cancers: a european consensus position paper
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4304377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25274616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdu459
work_keys_str_mv AT casalipg rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT bruzzip rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT bogaertsj rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT blayjy rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT aaprom rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT adamousa rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT berrutia rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT blayjy rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT bogaertsj rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT bressingtonj rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT bruzzib rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT capocacciar rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT cardosof rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT casalipg rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT celisje rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT cervantesa rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT ciardiellof rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT claussenc rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT colemanm rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT comiss rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT craines rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT deboltzd rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT delorenzof rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT deitosap rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT gattag rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT geisslerj rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT giulianir rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT grandee rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT gronchia rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT jezdics rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT jonssonb rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT jostl rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT keulenh rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT lacombed rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT lamoryg rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT lecamy rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT letodipriolos rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT licitral rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT macchiaf rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT marguliesa rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT marreauds rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT mcvieg rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT narbutass rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT oliverk rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT pavlidisn rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT pelouchovaj rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT pentheroudakisg rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT piccartm rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT pierottima rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT pravettonig rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT redmondk rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT riegmanp rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT ruffillimp rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT rynerd rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT sandruccis rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT seymourm rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT torriv rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT tramaa rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT vanbelles rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT vassalg rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT wartenbergm rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT wattsc rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT wilsona rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper
AT yaredw rarecancerseuropercemethodologicalrecommendationsforclinicalstudiesinrarecancersaeuropeanconsensuspositionpaper