Cargando…

Ineffectiveness of using the pressure relief valve technique during cuff inflation

OBJECTIVE: To test the effectiveness of using a cuff pressure relief valve technique to maintain cuff pressure levels within the normal in vitro range (Phase 1) in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (Phase 2) and to test the reproducibility of the technique using different syringes. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Annoni, Raquel, Pires-Neto, Ruy Camargo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Associação Brasileira de Medicina intensiva 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4304464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25607265
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20140056
_version_ 1782354106741948416
author Annoni, Raquel
Pires-Neto, Ruy Camargo
author_facet Annoni, Raquel
Pires-Neto, Ruy Camargo
author_sort Annoni, Raquel
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To test the effectiveness of using a cuff pressure relief valve technique to maintain cuff pressure levels within the normal in vitro range (Phase 1) in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (Phase 2) and to test the reproducibility of the technique using different syringes. METHODS: In Phase 1, a tracheal tube was inserted into a trachea model. Ten- and 20mL syringes were used to inflate the cuff through the tracheal tube. The cuff was slowly and steadily inflated until the syringe plunger would move in the opposite direction of the application. After the plunger stopped, the cuff pressures were recorded. In Phase 2, the same maneuvers for inflating the cuff were performed on 20 patients using 5, 10, and 20mL syringes and were compared with manometer measurements. The intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis were employed to determine the reproducibility and agreement between syringes. Data were expressed as medians (interquartile range). RESULTS: There was no reproducibility between syringes with an intraclass correlation coefficient ranging between -0.33 and 0.8 (p>0.05). The pressures generated with the syringes were higher than the pressures generated using a standard manometer: the 5mL syringe pressure was 105cmH(2)O (82.5-120cmH(2)O), the 10mL syringe pressure was 69cmH(2)O (47.5-111.3cmH(2)O), and the 20mL syringe pressure was 45cmH(2)O (35-59.5cmH(2)O). The Bland-Altman analysis confirmed the large bias and variability between the syringes used, compared with the manometer. CONCLUSION: The use of syringes is not an effective technique for determining the cuff pressure in patients admitted to the intensive care unit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4304464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Associação Brasileira de Medicina intensiva
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43044642015-02-04 Ineffectiveness of using the pressure relief valve technique during cuff inflation Annoni, Raquel Pires-Neto, Ruy Camargo Rev Bras Ter Intensiva Original Article OBJECTIVE: To test the effectiveness of using a cuff pressure relief valve technique to maintain cuff pressure levels within the normal in vitro range (Phase 1) in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (Phase 2) and to test the reproducibility of the technique using different syringes. METHODS: In Phase 1, a tracheal tube was inserted into a trachea model. Ten- and 20mL syringes were used to inflate the cuff through the tracheal tube. The cuff was slowly and steadily inflated until the syringe plunger would move in the opposite direction of the application. After the plunger stopped, the cuff pressures were recorded. In Phase 2, the same maneuvers for inflating the cuff were performed on 20 patients using 5, 10, and 20mL syringes and were compared with manometer measurements. The intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis were employed to determine the reproducibility and agreement between syringes. Data were expressed as medians (interquartile range). RESULTS: There was no reproducibility between syringes with an intraclass correlation coefficient ranging between -0.33 and 0.8 (p>0.05). The pressures generated with the syringes were higher than the pressures generated using a standard manometer: the 5mL syringe pressure was 105cmH(2)O (82.5-120cmH(2)O), the 10mL syringe pressure was 69cmH(2)O (47.5-111.3cmH(2)O), and the 20mL syringe pressure was 45cmH(2)O (35-59.5cmH(2)O). The Bland-Altman analysis confirmed the large bias and variability between the syringes used, compared with the manometer. CONCLUSION: The use of syringes is not an effective technique for determining the cuff pressure in patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Associação Brasileira de Medicina intensiva 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4304464/ /pubmed/25607265 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20140056 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Annoni, Raquel
Pires-Neto, Ruy Camargo
Ineffectiveness of using the pressure relief valve technique during cuff inflation
title Ineffectiveness of using the pressure relief valve technique during cuff inflation
title_full Ineffectiveness of using the pressure relief valve technique during cuff inflation
title_fullStr Ineffectiveness of using the pressure relief valve technique during cuff inflation
title_full_unstemmed Ineffectiveness of using the pressure relief valve technique during cuff inflation
title_short Ineffectiveness of using the pressure relief valve technique during cuff inflation
title_sort ineffectiveness of using the pressure relief valve technique during cuff inflation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4304464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25607265
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20140056
work_keys_str_mv AT annoniraquel ineffectivenessofusingthepressurereliefvalvetechniqueduringcuffinflation
AT piresnetoruycamargo ineffectivenessofusingthepressurereliefvalvetechniqueduringcuffinflation