Cargando…

Sensory evaluation and consumer acceptability of a beverage made from malted and fermented cereal: case of gowe from Benin

Sensory profile of gowe beverage was established with 10 gowe samples by 22 semitrained panelists. Besides, consumer study was performed on four representative gowe samples with 141 African ordinary consumers using a modified quantitative descriptive analysis. Gowe samples significantly differed (P ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adinsi, Laurent, Akissoé, Noël H, Dalodé-Vieira, Générose, Anihouvi, Victor B, Fliedel, Geneviève, Mestres, Christian, Hounhouigan, Joseph D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4304555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25649142
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.166
_version_ 1782354128038526976
author Adinsi, Laurent
Akissoé, Noël H
Dalodé-Vieira, Générose
Anihouvi, Victor B
Fliedel, Geneviève
Mestres, Christian
Hounhouigan, Joseph D
author_facet Adinsi, Laurent
Akissoé, Noël H
Dalodé-Vieira, Générose
Anihouvi, Victor B
Fliedel, Geneviève
Mestres, Christian
Hounhouigan, Joseph D
author_sort Adinsi, Laurent
collection PubMed
description Sensory profile of gowe beverage was established with 10 gowe samples by 22 semitrained panelists. Besides, consumer study was performed on four representative gowe samples with 141 African ordinary consumers using a modified quantitative descriptive analysis. Gowe samples significantly differed (P < 0.05) with respect to all the sensory attributes, except for cereal odor and cereal taste (P > 0.05). The principal component analysis plot revealed the effects of raw material and process: Sorghum gowe was differently scored from maize gowe samples (P < 0.05). Gowe types from saccharification step (SSaF, SSaSF) evidenced higher scores with respect to fermented odor (41.7) and acidic taste (47.9), while those without saccharification had lower scores of fermented odor and acidic taste, with values of 18.4 and 16.9, respectively. No significant difference was evidenced with respect to the addition of “non malted flour” before or after saccharification. Regarding consumer testing, three distinct patterns of consumer acceptability were observed, which were grouped as “Sugary gowe likers” (63.1% of consumers) followed by “Sugary and saccharified sorghum gowe likers” (20.6%) and “Pure maize gowe dislikers” (16.3%). Irrespective of the consumers cluster, saccharified malted sorghum gowe without sugar was the unique sample scored more than 6 over 9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4304555
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BlackWell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43045552015-02-03 Sensory evaluation and consumer acceptability of a beverage made from malted and fermented cereal: case of gowe from Benin Adinsi, Laurent Akissoé, Noël H Dalodé-Vieira, Générose Anihouvi, Victor B Fliedel, Geneviève Mestres, Christian Hounhouigan, Joseph D Food Sci Nutr Original Research Sensory profile of gowe beverage was established with 10 gowe samples by 22 semitrained panelists. Besides, consumer study was performed on four representative gowe samples with 141 African ordinary consumers using a modified quantitative descriptive analysis. Gowe samples significantly differed (P < 0.05) with respect to all the sensory attributes, except for cereal odor and cereal taste (P > 0.05). The principal component analysis plot revealed the effects of raw material and process: Sorghum gowe was differently scored from maize gowe samples (P < 0.05). Gowe types from saccharification step (SSaF, SSaSF) evidenced higher scores with respect to fermented odor (41.7) and acidic taste (47.9), while those without saccharification had lower scores of fermented odor and acidic taste, with values of 18.4 and 16.9, respectively. No significant difference was evidenced with respect to the addition of “non malted flour” before or after saccharification. Regarding consumer testing, three distinct patterns of consumer acceptability were observed, which were grouped as “Sugary gowe likers” (63.1% of consumers) followed by “Sugary and saccharified sorghum gowe likers” (20.6%) and “Pure maize gowe dislikers” (16.3%). Irrespective of the consumers cluster, saccharified malted sorghum gowe without sugar was the unique sample scored more than 6 over 9. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015-01 2014-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4304555/ /pubmed/25649142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.166 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Food Science & Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Adinsi, Laurent
Akissoé, Noël H
Dalodé-Vieira, Générose
Anihouvi, Victor B
Fliedel, Geneviève
Mestres, Christian
Hounhouigan, Joseph D
Sensory evaluation and consumer acceptability of a beverage made from malted and fermented cereal: case of gowe from Benin
title Sensory evaluation and consumer acceptability of a beverage made from malted and fermented cereal: case of gowe from Benin
title_full Sensory evaluation and consumer acceptability of a beverage made from malted and fermented cereal: case of gowe from Benin
title_fullStr Sensory evaluation and consumer acceptability of a beverage made from malted and fermented cereal: case of gowe from Benin
title_full_unstemmed Sensory evaluation and consumer acceptability of a beverage made from malted and fermented cereal: case of gowe from Benin
title_short Sensory evaluation and consumer acceptability of a beverage made from malted and fermented cereal: case of gowe from Benin
title_sort sensory evaluation and consumer acceptability of a beverage made from malted and fermented cereal: case of gowe from benin
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4304555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25649142
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.166
work_keys_str_mv AT adinsilaurent sensoryevaluationandconsumeracceptabilityofabeveragemadefrommaltedandfermentedcerealcaseofgowefrombenin
AT akissoenoelh sensoryevaluationandconsumeracceptabilityofabeveragemadefrommaltedandfermentedcerealcaseofgowefrombenin
AT dalodevieiragenerose sensoryevaluationandconsumeracceptabilityofabeveragemadefrommaltedandfermentedcerealcaseofgowefrombenin
AT anihouvivictorb sensoryevaluationandconsumeracceptabilityofabeveragemadefrommaltedandfermentedcerealcaseofgowefrombenin
AT fliedelgenevieve sensoryevaluationandconsumeracceptabilityofabeveragemadefrommaltedandfermentedcerealcaseofgowefrombenin
AT mestreschristian sensoryevaluationandconsumeracceptabilityofabeveragemadefrommaltedandfermentedcerealcaseofgowefrombenin
AT hounhouiganjosephd sensoryevaluationandconsumeracceptabilityofabeveragemadefrommaltedandfermentedcerealcaseofgowefrombenin