Cargando…
Sensory evaluation and consumer acceptability of a beverage made from malted and fermented cereal: case of gowe from Benin
Sensory profile of gowe beverage was established with 10 gowe samples by 22 semitrained panelists. Besides, consumer study was performed on four representative gowe samples with 141 African ordinary consumers using a modified quantitative descriptive analysis. Gowe samples significantly differed (P ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BlackWell Publishing Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4304555/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25649142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.166 |
_version_ | 1782354128038526976 |
---|---|
author | Adinsi, Laurent Akissoé, Noël H Dalodé-Vieira, Générose Anihouvi, Victor B Fliedel, Geneviève Mestres, Christian Hounhouigan, Joseph D |
author_facet | Adinsi, Laurent Akissoé, Noël H Dalodé-Vieira, Générose Anihouvi, Victor B Fliedel, Geneviève Mestres, Christian Hounhouigan, Joseph D |
author_sort | Adinsi, Laurent |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sensory profile of gowe beverage was established with 10 gowe samples by 22 semitrained panelists. Besides, consumer study was performed on four representative gowe samples with 141 African ordinary consumers using a modified quantitative descriptive analysis. Gowe samples significantly differed (P < 0.05) with respect to all the sensory attributes, except for cereal odor and cereal taste (P > 0.05). The principal component analysis plot revealed the effects of raw material and process: Sorghum gowe was differently scored from maize gowe samples (P < 0.05). Gowe types from saccharification step (SSaF, SSaSF) evidenced higher scores with respect to fermented odor (41.7) and acidic taste (47.9), while those without saccharification had lower scores of fermented odor and acidic taste, with values of 18.4 and 16.9, respectively. No significant difference was evidenced with respect to the addition of “non malted flour” before or after saccharification. Regarding consumer testing, three distinct patterns of consumer acceptability were observed, which were grouped as “Sugary gowe likers” (63.1% of consumers) followed by “Sugary and saccharified sorghum gowe likers” (20.6%) and “Pure maize gowe dislikers” (16.3%). Irrespective of the consumers cluster, saccharified malted sorghum gowe without sugar was the unique sample scored more than 6 over 9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4304555 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BlackWell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43045552015-02-03 Sensory evaluation and consumer acceptability of a beverage made from malted and fermented cereal: case of gowe from Benin Adinsi, Laurent Akissoé, Noël H Dalodé-Vieira, Générose Anihouvi, Victor B Fliedel, Geneviève Mestres, Christian Hounhouigan, Joseph D Food Sci Nutr Original Research Sensory profile of gowe beverage was established with 10 gowe samples by 22 semitrained panelists. Besides, consumer study was performed on four representative gowe samples with 141 African ordinary consumers using a modified quantitative descriptive analysis. Gowe samples significantly differed (P < 0.05) with respect to all the sensory attributes, except for cereal odor and cereal taste (P > 0.05). The principal component analysis plot revealed the effects of raw material and process: Sorghum gowe was differently scored from maize gowe samples (P < 0.05). Gowe types from saccharification step (SSaF, SSaSF) evidenced higher scores with respect to fermented odor (41.7) and acidic taste (47.9), while those without saccharification had lower scores of fermented odor and acidic taste, with values of 18.4 and 16.9, respectively. No significant difference was evidenced with respect to the addition of “non malted flour” before or after saccharification. Regarding consumer testing, three distinct patterns of consumer acceptability were observed, which were grouped as “Sugary gowe likers” (63.1% of consumers) followed by “Sugary and saccharified sorghum gowe likers” (20.6%) and “Pure maize gowe dislikers” (16.3%). Irrespective of the consumers cluster, saccharified malted sorghum gowe without sugar was the unique sample scored more than 6 over 9. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015-01 2014-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4304555/ /pubmed/25649142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.166 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Food Science & Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Adinsi, Laurent Akissoé, Noël H Dalodé-Vieira, Générose Anihouvi, Victor B Fliedel, Geneviève Mestres, Christian Hounhouigan, Joseph D Sensory evaluation and consumer acceptability of a beverage made from malted and fermented cereal: case of gowe from Benin |
title | Sensory evaluation and consumer acceptability of a beverage made from malted and fermented cereal: case of gowe from Benin |
title_full | Sensory evaluation and consumer acceptability of a beverage made from malted and fermented cereal: case of gowe from Benin |
title_fullStr | Sensory evaluation and consumer acceptability of a beverage made from malted and fermented cereal: case of gowe from Benin |
title_full_unstemmed | Sensory evaluation and consumer acceptability of a beverage made from malted and fermented cereal: case of gowe from Benin |
title_short | Sensory evaluation and consumer acceptability of a beverage made from malted and fermented cereal: case of gowe from Benin |
title_sort | sensory evaluation and consumer acceptability of a beverage made from malted and fermented cereal: case of gowe from benin |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4304555/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25649142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.166 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adinsilaurent sensoryevaluationandconsumeracceptabilityofabeveragemadefrommaltedandfermentedcerealcaseofgowefrombenin AT akissoenoelh sensoryevaluationandconsumeracceptabilityofabeveragemadefrommaltedandfermentedcerealcaseofgowefrombenin AT dalodevieiragenerose sensoryevaluationandconsumeracceptabilityofabeveragemadefrommaltedandfermentedcerealcaseofgowefrombenin AT anihouvivictorb sensoryevaluationandconsumeracceptabilityofabeveragemadefrommaltedandfermentedcerealcaseofgowefrombenin AT fliedelgenevieve sensoryevaluationandconsumeracceptabilityofabeveragemadefrommaltedandfermentedcerealcaseofgowefrombenin AT mestreschristian sensoryevaluationandconsumeracceptabilityofabeveragemadefrommaltedandfermentedcerealcaseofgowefrombenin AT hounhouiganjosephd sensoryevaluationandconsumeracceptabilityofabeveragemadefrommaltedandfermentedcerealcaseofgowefrombenin |