Cargando…

Retrospective Review of the Drop in Observer Detection Performance Over Time in Lesion-enriched Experimental Studies

The vigilance decrement describes a decrease in sensitivity or increase in specificity with time on task. It has been observed in a variety of repetitive visual tasks, but little is known about these patterns in radiologists. We investigated whether there is systematic variation in performance over...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taylor-Phillips, Sian, Elze, Markus C., Krupinski, Elizabeth A., Dennick, Kathryn, Gale, Alastair G., Clarke, Aileen, Mello-Thoms, Claudia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4305061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25005866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-014-9717-9
_version_ 1782354177427505152
author Taylor-Phillips, Sian
Elze, Markus C.
Krupinski, Elizabeth A.
Dennick, Kathryn
Gale, Alastair G.
Clarke, Aileen
Mello-Thoms, Claudia
author_facet Taylor-Phillips, Sian
Elze, Markus C.
Krupinski, Elizabeth A.
Dennick, Kathryn
Gale, Alastair G.
Clarke, Aileen
Mello-Thoms, Claudia
author_sort Taylor-Phillips, Sian
collection PubMed
description The vigilance decrement describes a decrease in sensitivity or increase in specificity with time on task. It has been observed in a variety of repetitive visual tasks, but little is known about these patterns in radiologists. We investigated whether there is systematic variation in performance over the course of a radiology reading session. We re-analyzed data from six previous lesion-enriched radiology studies. Studies featured 8–22 participants assessing 27–100 cases (including mammograms, chest CT, chest x-ray, and bone x-ray) in a reading session. Changes in performance and speed as the reading session progressed were analyzed using mixed effects models. Time taken per case decreased 9–23 % as the reading session progressed (p < 0.005 for every study). There was a sensitivity decrease or specificity increase over the course of reading 100 chest x-rays (p = 0.005), 60 bone fracture x-rays (p = 0.03), and 100 chest CT scans (p < 0.0001). This effect was not found in the shorter mammography sessions with 27 or 50 cases. We found evidence supporting the hypothesis that behavior and performance may change over the course of reading an enriched test set. Further research is required to ascertain whether this effect is present in radiological practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4305061
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43050612015-01-27 Retrospective Review of the Drop in Observer Detection Performance Over Time in Lesion-enriched Experimental Studies Taylor-Phillips, Sian Elze, Markus C. Krupinski, Elizabeth A. Dennick, Kathryn Gale, Alastair G. Clarke, Aileen Mello-Thoms, Claudia J Digit Imaging Article The vigilance decrement describes a decrease in sensitivity or increase in specificity with time on task. It has been observed in a variety of repetitive visual tasks, but little is known about these patterns in radiologists. We investigated whether there is systematic variation in performance over the course of a radiology reading session. We re-analyzed data from six previous lesion-enriched radiology studies. Studies featured 8–22 participants assessing 27–100 cases (including mammograms, chest CT, chest x-ray, and bone x-ray) in a reading session. Changes in performance and speed as the reading session progressed were analyzed using mixed effects models. Time taken per case decreased 9–23 % as the reading session progressed (p < 0.005 for every study). There was a sensitivity decrease or specificity increase over the course of reading 100 chest x-rays (p = 0.005), 60 bone fracture x-rays (p = 0.03), and 100 chest CT scans (p < 0.0001). This effect was not found in the shorter mammography sessions with 27 or 50 cases. We found evidence supporting the hypothesis that behavior and performance may change over the course of reading an enriched test set. Further research is required to ascertain whether this effect is present in radiological practice. Springer US 2014-07-09 2015-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4305061/ /pubmed/25005866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-014-9717-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Taylor-Phillips, Sian
Elze, Markus C.
Krupinski, Elizabeth A.
Dennick, Kathryn
Gale, Alastair G.
Clarke, Aileen
Mello-Thoms, Claudia
Retrospective Review of the Drop in Observer Detection Performance Over Time in Lesion-enriched Experimental Studies
title Retrospective Review of the Drop in Observer Detection Performance Over Time in Lesion-enriched Experimental Studies
title_full Retrospective Review of the Drop in Observer Detection Performance Over Time in Lesion-enriched Experimental Studies
title_fullStr Retrospective Review of the Drop in Observer Detection Performance Over Time in Lesion-enriched Experimental Studies
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective Review of the Drop in Observer Detection Performance Over Time in Lesion-enriched Experimental Studies
title_short Retrospective Review of the Drop in Observer Detection Performance Over Time in Lesion-enriched Experimental Studies
title_sort retrospective review of the drop in observer detection performance over time in lesion-enriched experimental studies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4305061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25005866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-014-9717-9
work_keys_str_mv AT taylorphillipssian retrospectivereviewofthedropinobserverdetectionperformanceovertimeinlesionenrichedexperimentalstudies
AT elzemarkusc retrospectivereviewofthedropinobserverdetectionperformanceovertimeinlesionenrichedexperimentalstudies
AT krupinskielizabetha retrospectivereviewofthedropinobserverdetectionperformanceovertimeinlesionenrichedexperimentalstudies
AT dennickkathryn retrospectivereviewofthedropinobserverdetectionperformanceovertimeinlesionenrichedexperimentalstudies
AT galealastairg retrospectivereviewofthedropinobserverdetectionperformanceovertimeinlesionenrichedexperimentalstudies
AT clarkeaileen retrospectivereviewofthedropinobserverdetectionperformanceovertimeinlesionenrichedexperimentalstudies
AT mellothomsclaudia retrospectivereviewofthedropinobserverdetectionperformanceovertimeinlesionenrichedexperimentalstudies