Cargando…
Patients’ perceived value of pharmacy quality measures: a mixed-methods study
OBJECTIVE: To describe patients’ perceived value and use of quality measures in evaluating and choosing community pharmacies. DESIGN: Focus group methodology was combined with a survey tool. During the focus groups, participants assessed the value of the Pharmacy Quality Alliance's quality meas...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4305069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25600253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006086 |
_version_ | 1782354178854617088 |
---|---|
author | Shiyanbola, Olayinka O Mort, Jane R |
author_facet | Shiyanbola, Olayinka O Mort, Jane R |
author_sort | Shiyanbola, Olayinka O |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To describe patients’ perceived value and use of quality measures in evaluating and choosing community pharmacies. DESIGN: Focus group methodology was combined with a survey tool. During the focus groups, participants assessed the value of the Pharmacy Quality Alliance's quality measures in evaluating and choosing a pharmacy. Also, participants completed questionnaires rating their perceived value of quality measures in evaluating a pharmacy (1 being low value and 5 being high) or choosing a pharmacy (yes/no). Thematic analysis and descriptive statistics were used to analyse the focus groups and surveys, respectively. SETTING: Semistructured focus groups were conducted in a private meeting space of an urban and a rural area of a Mid-western State in the USA. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-four adults who filled prescription medications in community pharmacies for a chronic illness were recruited in community pharmacies, senior centres and public libraries. RESULTS: While comments indicated that all measures were important, medication safety measures (eg, drug-drug interactions) were valued more highly than others. Rating of quality measure utility in evaluating a pharmacy ranged from a mean of 4.88 (‘drug-drug interactions’) to a mean of 4.0 (‘absence of controller therapy for patients with asthma’). Patients were hesitant to use quality information in choosing a pharmacy (depending on the participant's location) but might consider if moving to a new area or having had a negative pharmacy experience. Use of select quality measures to choose a pharmacy ranged from 97.1% of participants using ‘drug-drug interactions’ (medication safety measure) to 55.9% using ‘absence of controller therapy for patients with asthma’. CONCLUSIONS: The study participants valued quality measures in evaluating and selecting a community pharmacy, with medication safety measures valued highest. The participants reported that the quality measures would not typically cause a switch in pharmacy but might influence their selection in certain situations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4305069 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43050692015-01-28 Patients’ perceived value of pharmacy quality measures: a mixed-methods study Shiyanbola, Olayinka O Mort, Jane R BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To describe patients’ perceived value and use of quality measures in evaluating and choosing community pharmacies. DESIGN: Focus group methodology was combined with a survey tool. During the focus groups, participants assessed the value of the Pharmacy Quality Alliance's quality measures in evaluating and choosing a pharmacy. Also, participants completed questionnaires rating their perceived value of quality measures in evaluating a pharmacy (1 being low value and 5 being high) or choosing a pharmacy (yes/no). Thematic analysis and descriptive statistics were used to analyse the focus groups and surveys, respectively. SETTING: Semistructured focus groups were conducted in a private meeting space of an urban and a rural area of a Mid-western State in the USA. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-four adults who filled prescription medications in community pharmacies for a chronic illness were recruited in community pharmacies, senior centres and public libraries. RESULTS: While comments indicated that all measures were important, medication safety measures (eg, drug-drug interactions) were valued more highly than others. Rating of quality measure utility in evaluating a pharmacy ranged from a mean of 4.88 (‘drug-drug interactions’) to a mean of 4.0 (‘absence of controller therapy for patients with asthma’). Patients were hesitant to use quality information in choosing a pharmacy (depending on the participant's location) but might consider if moving to a new area or having had a negative pharmacy experience. Use of select quality measures to choose a pharmacy ranged from 97.1% of participants using ‘drug-drug interactions’ (medication safety measure) to 55.9% using ‘absence of controller therapy for patients with asthma’. CONCLUSIONS: The study participants valued quality measures in evaluating and selecting a community pharmacy, with medication safety measures valued highest. The participants reported that the quality measures would not typically cause a switch in pharmacy but might influence their selection in certain situations. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4305069/ /pubmed/25600253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006086 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Shiyanbola, Olayinka O Mort, Jane R Patients’ perceived value of pharmacy quality measures: a mixed-methods study |
title | Patients’ perceived value of pharmacy quality measures: a mixed-methods study |
title_full | Patients’ perceived value of pharmacy quality measures: a mixed-methods study |
title_fullStr | Patients’ perceived value of pharmacy quality measures: a mixed-methods study |
title_full_unstemmed | Patients’ perceived value of pharmacy quality measures: a mixed-methods study |
title_short | Patients’ perceived value of pharmacy quality measures: a mixed-methods study |
title_sort | patients’ perceived value of pharmacy quality measures: a mixed-methods study |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4305069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25600253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006086 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shiyanbolaolayinkao patientsperceivedvalueofpharmacyqualitymeasuresamixedmethodsstudy AT mortjaner patientsperceivedvalueofpharmacyqualitymeasuresamixedmethodsstudy |