Cargando…

The Process, Outcomes, and Challenges of Feasibility Studies Conducted in Partnership With Stakeholders: A Health Intervention for Women Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence

Feasibility studies play a crucial role in determining whether complex, community-based interventions should be subject to efficacy testing. Reports of such studies often focus on efficacy potential but less often examine other elements of feasibility, such as acceptance by clients and professionals...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wuest, Judith, Merritt-Gray, Marilyn, Dubé, Norma, Hodgins, Marilyn J, Malcolm, Jeannie, Majerovich, Jo Ann, Scott-Storey, Kelly, Ford-Gilboe, Marilyn, Varcoe, Colleen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4305208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25594917
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nur.21636
_version_ 1782354193704550400
author Wuest, Judith
Merritt-Gray, Marilyn
Dubé, Norma
Hodgins, Marilyn J
Malcolm, Jeannie
Majerovich, Jo Ann
Scott-Storey, Kelly
Ford-Gilboe, Marilyn
Varcoe, Colleen
author_facet Wuest, Judith
Merritt-Gray, Marilyn
Dubé, Norma
Hodgins, Marilyn J
Malcolm, Jeannie
Majerovich, Jo Ann
Scott-Storey, Kelly
Ford-Gilboe, Marilyn
Varcoe, Colleen
author_sort Wuest, Judith
collection PubMed
description Feasibility studies play a crucial role in determining whether complex, community-based interventions should be subject to efficacy testing. Reports of such studies often focus on efficacy potential but less often examine other elements of feasibility, such as acceptance by clients and professionals, practicality, and system integration, which are critical to decisions for proceeding with controlled efficacy testing. Although stakeholder partnership in feasibility studies is widely suggested to facilitate the research process, strengthen relevance, and increase knowledge transfer, little is written about how this occurs or its consequences and outcomes. We began to address these gaps in knowledge in a feasibility study of a health intervention for women survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV) conducted in partnership with policy, community and practitioner stakeholders. We employed a mixed-method design, combining a single-group, pre-post intervention study with 52 survivors of IPV, of whom 42 completed data collection, with chart review data and interviews of 18 purposefully sampled participants and all 9 interventionists. We assessed intervention feasibility in terms of acceptability, demand, practicality, implementation, adaptation, integration, and efficacy potential. Our findings demonstrate the scope of knowledge attainable when diverse elements of feasibility are considered, as well as the benefits and challenges of partnership. The implications of diverse perspectives on knowledge transfer are discussed. Our findings show the importance of examining elements of feasibility for complex community-based health interventions as a basis for determining whether controlled intervention efficacy testing is justified and for refining both the intervention and the research design. © 2015 The Authors. Research in Nursing & Health published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4305208
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BlackWell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43052082015-02-02 The Process, Outcomes, and Challenges of Feasibility Studies Conducted in Partnership With Stakeholders: A Health Intervention for Women Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence Wuest, Judith Merritt-Gray, Marilyn Dubé, Norma Hodgins, Marilyn J Malcolm, Jeannie Majerovich, Jo Ann Scott-Storey, Kelly Ford-Gilboe, Marilyn Varcoe, Colleen Res Nurs Health Research Reports Feasibility studies play a crucial role in determining whether complex, community-based interventions should be subject to efficacy testing. Reports of such studies often focus on efficacy potential but less often examine other elements of feasibility, such as acceptance by clients and professionals, practicality, and system integration, which are critical to decisions for proceeding with controlled efficacy testing. Although stakeholder partnership in feasibility studies is widely suggested to facilitate the research process, strengthen relevance, and increase knowledge transfer, little is written about how this occurs or its consequences and outcomes. We began to address these gaps in knowledge in a feasibility study of a health intervention for women survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV) conducted in partnership with policy, community and practitioner stakeholders. We employed a mixed-method design, combining a single-group, pre-post intervention study with 52 survivors of IPV, of whom 42 completed data collection, with chart review data and interviews of 18 purposefully sampled participants and all 9 interventionists. We assessed intervention feasibility in terms of acceptability, demand, practicality, implementation, adaptation, integration, and efficacy potential. Our findings demonstrate the scope of knowledge attainable when diverse elements of feasibility are considered, as well as the benefits and challenges of partnership. The implications of diverse perspectives on knowledge transfer are discussed. Our findings show the importance of examining elements of feasibility for complex community-based health interventions as a basis for determining whether controlled intervention efficacy testing is justified and for refining both the intervention and the research design. © 2015 The Authors. Research in Nursing & Health published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015-02 2015-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4305208/ /pubmed/25594917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nur.21636 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Research in Nursing & Health published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Reports
Wuest, Judith
Merritt-Gray, Marilyn
Dubé, Norma
Hodgins, Marilyn J
Malcolm, Jeannie
Majerovich, Jo Ann
Scott-Storey, Kelly
Ford-Gilboe, Marilyn
Varcoe, Colleen
The Process, Outcomes, and Challenges of Feasibility Studies Conducted in Partnership With Stakeholders: A Health Intervention for Women Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence
title The Process, Outcomes, and Challenges of Feasibility Studies Conducted in Partnership With Stakeholders: A Health Intervention for Women Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence
title_full The Process, Outcomes, and Challenges of Feasibility Studies Conducted in Partnership With Stakeholders: A Health Intervention for Women Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence
title_fullStr The Process, Outcomes, and Challenges of Feasibility Studies Conducted in Partnership With Stakeholders: A Health Intervention for Women Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence
title_full_unstemmed The Process, Outcomes, and Challenges of Feasibility Studies Conducted in Partnership With Stakeholders: A Health Intervention for Women Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence
title_short The Process, Outcomes, and Challenges of Feasibility Studies Conducted in Partnership With Stakeholders: A Health Intervention for Women Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence
title_sort process, outcomes, and challenges of feasibility studies conducted in partnership with stakeholders: a health intervention for women survivors of intimate partner violence
topic Research Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4305208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25594917
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nur.21636
work_keys_str_mv AT wuestjudith theprocessoutcomesandchallengesoffeasibilitystudiesconductedinpartnershipwithstakeholdersahealthinterventionforwomensurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolence
AT merrittgraymarilyn theprocessoutcomesandchallengesoffeasibilitystudiesconductedinpartnershipwithstakeholdersahealthinterventionforwomensurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolence
AT dubenorma theprocessoutcomesandchallengesoffeasibilitystudiesconductedinpartnershipwithstakeholdersahealthinterventionforwomensurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolence
AT hodginsmarilynj theprocessoutcomesandchallengesoffeasibilitystudiesconductedinpartnershipwithstakeholdersahealthinterventionforwomensurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolence
AT malcolmjeannie theprocessoutcomesandchallengesoffeasibilitystudiesconductedinpartnershipwithstakeholdersahealthinterventionforwomensurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolence
AT majerovichjoann theprocessoutcomesandchallengesoffeasibilitystudiesconductedinpartnershipwithstakeholdersahealthinterventionforwomensurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolence
AT scottstoreykelly theprocessoutcomesandchallengesoffeasibilitystudiesconductedinpartnershipwithstakeholdersahealthinterventionforwomensurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolence
AT fordgilboemarilyn theprocessoutcomesandchallengesoffeasibilitystudiesconductedinpartnershipwithstakeholdersahealthinterventionforwomensurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolence
AT varcoecolleen theprocessoutcomesandchallengesoffeasibilitystudiesconductedinpartnershipwithstakeholdersahealthinterventionforwomensurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolence
AT wuestjudith processoutcomesandchallengesoffeasibilitystudiesconductedinpartnershipwithstakeholdersahealthinterventionforwomensurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolence
AT merrittgraymarilyn processoutcomesandchallengesoffeasibilitystudiesconductedinpartnershipwithstakeholdersahealthinterventionforwomensurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolence
AT dubenorma processoutcomesandchallengesoffeasibilitystudiesconductedinpartnershipwithstakeholdersahealthinterventionforwomensurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolence
AT hodginsmarilynj processoutcomesandchallengesoffeasibilitystudiesconductedinpartnershipwithstakeholdersahealthinterventionforwomensurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolence
AT malcolmjeannie processoutcomesandchallengesoffeasibilitystudiesconductedinpartnershipwithstakeholdersahealthinterventionforwomensurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolence
AT majerovichjoann processoutcomesandchallengesoffeasibilitystudiesconductedinpartnershipwithstakeholdersahealthinterventionforwomensurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolence
AT scottstoreykelly processoutcomesandchallengesoffeasibilitystudiesconductedinpartnershipwithstakeholdersahealthinterventionforwomensurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolence
AT fordgilboemarilyn processoutcomesandchallengesoffeasibilitystudiesconductedinpartnershipwithstakeholdersahealthinterventionforwomensurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolence
AT varcoecolleen processoutcomesandchallengesoffeasibilitystudiesconductedinpartnershipwithstakeholdersahealthinterventionforwomensurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolence