Cargando…
The Process, Outcomes, and Challenges of Feasibility Studies Conducted in Partnership With Stakeholders: A Health Intervention for Women Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence
Feasibility studies play a crucial role in determining whether complex, community-based interventions should be subject to efficacy testing. Reports of such studies often focus on efficacy potential but less often examine other elements of feasibility, such as acceptance by clients and professionals...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BlackWell Publishing Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4305208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25594917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nur.21636 |
_version_ | 1782354193704550400 |
---|---|
author | Wuest, Judith Merritt-Gray, Marilyn Dubé, Norma Hodgins, Marilyn J Malcolm, Jeannie Majerovich, Jo Ann Scott-Storey, Kelly Ford-Gilboe, Marilyn Varcoe, Colleen |
author_facet | Wuest, Judith Merritt-Gray, Marilyn Dubé, Norma Hodgins, Marilyn J Malcolm, Jeannie Majerovich, Jo Ann Scott-Storey, Kelly Ford-Gilboe, Marilyn Varcoe, Colleen |
author_sort | Wuest, Judith |
collection | PubMed |
description | Feasibility studies play a crucial role in determining whether complex, community-based interventions should be subject to efficacy testing. Reports of such studies often focus on efficacy potential but less often examine other elements of feasibility, such as acceptance by clients and professionals, practicality, and system integration, which are critical to decisions for proceeding with controlled efficacy testing. Although stakeholder partnership in feasibility studies is widely suggested to facilitate the research process, strengthen relevance, and increase knowledge transfer, little is written about how this occurs or its consequences and outcomes. We began to address these gaps in knowledge in a feasibility study of a health intervention for women survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV) conducted in partnership with policy, community and practitioner stakeholders. We employed a mixed-method design, combining a single-group, pre-post intervention study with 52 survivors of IPV, of whom 42 completed data collection, with chart review data and interviews of 18 purposefully sampled participants and all 9 interventionists. We assessed intervention feasibility in terms of acceptability, demand, practicality, implementation, adaptation, integration, and efficacy potential. Our findings demonstrate the scope of knowledge attainable when diverse elements of feasibility are considered, as well as the benefits and challenges of partnership. The implications of diverse perspectives on knowledge transfer are discussed. Our findings show the importance of examining elements of feasibility for complex community-based health interventions as a basis for determining whether controlled intervention efficacy testing is justified and for refining both the intervention and the research design. © 2015 The Authors. Research in Nursing & Health published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4305208 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BlackWell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43052082015-02-02 The Process, Outcomes, and Challenges of Feasibility Studies Conducted in Partnership With Stakeholders: A Health Intervention for Women Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence Wuest, Judith Merritt-Gray, Marilyn Dubé, Norma Hodgins, Marilyn J Malcolm, Jeannie Majerovich, Jo Ann Scott-Storey, Kelly Ford-Gilboe, Marilyn Varcoe, Colleen Res Nurs Health Research Reports Feasibility studies play a crucial role in determining whether complex, community-based interventions should be subject to efficacy testing. Reports of such studies often focus on efficacy potential but less often examine other elements of feasibility, such as acceptance by clients and professionals, practicality, and system integration, which are critical to decisions for proceeding with controlled efficacy testing. Although stakeholder partnership in feasibility studies is widely suggested to facilitate the research process, strengthen relevance, and increase knowledge transfer, little is written about how this occurs or its consequences and outcomes. We began to address these gaps in knowledge in a feasibility study of a health intervention for women survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV) conducted in partnership with policy, community and practitioner stakeholders. We employed a mixed-method design, combining a single-group, pre-post intervention study with 52 survivors of IPV, of whom 42 completed data collection, with chart review data and interviews of 18 purposefully sampled participants and all 9 interventionists. We assessed intervention feasibility in terms of acceptability, demand, practicality, implementation, adaptation, integration, and efficacy potential. Our findings demonstrate the scope of knowledge attainable when diverse elements of feasibility are considered, as well as the benefits and challenges of partnership. The implications of diverse perspectives on knowledge transfer are discussed. Our findings show the importance of examining elements of feasibility for complex community-based health interventions as a basis for determining whether controlled intervention efficacy testing is justified and for refining both the intervention and the research design. © 2015 The Authors. Research in Nursing & Health published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015-02 2015-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4305208/ /pubmed/25594917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nur.21636 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Research in Nursing & Health published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Research Reports Wuest, Judith Merritt-Gray, Marilyn Dubé, Norma Hodgins, Marilyn J Malcolm, Jeannie Majerovich, Jo Ann Scott-Storey, Kelly Ford-Gilboe, Marilyn Varcoe, Colleen The Process, Outcomes, and Challenges of Feasibility Studies Conducted in Partnership With Stakeholders: A Health Intervention for Women Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence |
title | The Process, Outcomes, and Challenges of Feasibility Studies Conducted in Partnership With Stakeholders: A Health Intervention for Women Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence |
title_full | The Process, Outcomes, and Challenges of Feasibility Studies Conducted in Partnership With Stakeholders: A Health Intervention for Women Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence |
title_fullStr | The Process, Outcomes, and Challenges of Feasibility Studies Conducted in Partnership With Stakeholders: A Health Intervention for Women Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence |
title_full_unstemmed | The Process, Outcomes, and Challenges of Feasibility Studies Conducted in Partnership With Stakeholders: A Health Intervention for Women Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence |
title_short | The Process, Outcomes, and Challenges of Feasibility Studies Conducted in Partnership With Stakeholders: A Health Intervention for Women Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence |
title_sort | process, outcomes, and challenges of feasibility studies conducted in partnership with stakeholders: a health intervention for women survivors of intimate partner violence |
topic | Research Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4305208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25594917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nur.21636 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wuestjudith theprocessoutcomesandchallengesoffeasibilitystudiesconductedinpartnershipwithstakeholdersahealthinterventionforwomensurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolence AT merrittgraymarilyn theprocessoutcomesandchallengesoffeasibilitystudiesconductedinpartnershipwithstakeholdersahealthinterventionforwomensurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolence AT dubenorma theprocessoutcomesandchallengesoffeasibilitystudiesconductedinpartnershipwithstakeholdersahealthinterventionforwomensurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolence AT hodginsmarilynj theprocessoutcomesandchallengesoffeasibilitystudiesconductedinpartnershipwithstakeholdersahealthinterventionforwomensurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolence AT malcolmjeannie theprocessoutcomesandchallengesoffeasibilitystudiesconductedinpartnershipwithstakeholdersahealthinterventionforwomensurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolence AT majerovichjoann theprocessoutcomesandchallengesoffeasibilitystudiesconductedinpartnershipwithstakeholdersahealthinterventionforwomensurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolence AT scottstoreykelly theprocessoutcomesandchallengesoffeasibilitystudiesconductedinpartnershipwithstakeholdersahealthinterventionforwomensurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolence AT fordgilboemarilyn theprocessoutcomesandchallengesoffeasibilitystudiesconductedinpartnershipwithstakeholdersahealthinterventionforwomensurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolence AT varcoecolleen theprocessoutcomesandchallengesoffeasibilitystudiesconductedinpartnershipwithstakeholdersahealthinterventionforwomensurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolence AT wuestjudith processoutcomesandchallengesoffeasibilitystudiesconductedinpartnershipwithstakeholdersahealthinterventionforwomensurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolence AT merrittgraymarilyn processoutcomesandchallengesoffeasibilitystudiesconductedinpartnershipwithstakeholdersahealthinterventionforwomensurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolence AT dubenorma processoutcomesandchallengesoffeasibilitystudiesconductedinpartnershipwithstakeholdersahealthinterventionforwomensurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolence AT hodginsmarilynj processoutcomesandchallengesoffeasibilitystudiesconductedinpartnershipwithstakeholdersahealthinterventionforwomensurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolence AT malcolmjeannie processoutcomesandchallengesoffeasibilitystudiesconductedinpartnershipwithstakeholdersahealthinterventionforwomensurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolence AT majerovichjoann processoutcomesandchallengesoffeasibilitystudiesconductedinpartnershipwithstakeholdersahealthinterventionforwomensurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolence AT scottstoreykelly processoutcomesandchallengesoffeasibilitystudiesconductedinpartnershipwithstakeholdersahealthinterventionforwomensurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolence AT fordgilboemarilyn processoutcomesandchallengesoffeasibilitystudiesconductedinpartnershipwithstakeholdersahealthinterventionforwomensurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolence AT varcoecolleen processoutcomesandchallengesoffeasibilitystudiesconductedinpartnershipwithstakeholdersahealthinterventionforwomensurvivorsofintimatepartnerviolence |