Cargando…

A comparison of trapezius muscle activities of different shoulder abduction angles and rotation conditions during prone horizontal abduction

[Purpose] This study examined the differences in the activities of three parts of the trapezius muscle—the upper trapezius (UT), middle trapezius (MT), and lower trapezius (LT)—among three different rotation conditions of the shoulders, while subjects performed prone horizontal abduction (PHA) at 30...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lim, Jin Yong, Lee, Jung Seok, Mun, Byeong Mu, Kim, Tae Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4305608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25642047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.97
_version_ 1782354249442656256
author Lim, Jin Yong
Lee, Jung Seok
Mun, Byeong Mu
Kim, Tae Ho
author_facet Lim, Jin Yong
Lee, Jung Seok
Mun, Byeong Mu
Kim, Tae Ho
author_sort Lim, Jin Yong
collection PubMed
description [Purpose] This study examined the differences in the activities of three parts of the trapezius muscle—the upper trapezius (UT), middle trapezius (MT), and lower trapezius (LT)—among three different rotation conditions of the shoulders, while subjects performed prone horizontal abduction (PHA) at 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° of abduction. [Subjects and Methods] The subjects of this experimental study were 16 healthy male adults. Surface electromyography was used to collect data on the activity of each part of the trapezius. A two-way analysis of variance was used to compare the activities of each area of the trapezius—the UT, MT, and LT—among internal rotation (IR), the neutral position (NP), and external rotation (ER) of the shoulders during PHA with shoulder abduction of 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120°. [Results] Activity of the UT, MT, and LT significantly increased as the shoulder abduction angle increased during PHA. There was a significant difference only in the activity of the LT, with change in shoulder rotation. In addition, the muscle activity of the LT was highest during shoulder IR at 120°. [Conclusion] Although activity of the LT was the highest during IR at 120 abduction, PHA accompanied by ER at an abduction angle of 120° would be effective at eliciting high activity in the LT when PHA is performed. Nonetheless, at an early stage of rehabilitation, PHA accompanied by ER at low abduction angles of 30° and 60° would be desirable to elicit low activity of the UT and high activity of the LT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4305608
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Society of Physical Therapy Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43056082015-01-30 A comparison of trapezius muscle activities of different shoulder abduction angles and rotation conditions during prone horizontal abduction Lim, Jin Yong Lee, Jung Seok Mun, Byeong Mu Kim, Tae Ho J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] This study examined the differences in the activities of three parts of the trapezius muscle—the upper trapezius (UT), middle trapezius (MT), and lower trapezius (LT)—among three different rotation conditions of the shoulders, while subjects performed prone horizontal abduction (PHA) at 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° of abduction. [Subjects and Methods] The subjects of this experimental study were 16 healthy male adults. Surface electromyography was used to collect data on the activity of each part of the trapezius. A two-way analysis of variance was used to compare the activities of each area of the trapezius—the UT, MT, and LT—among internal rotation (IR), the neutral position (NP), and external rotation (ER) of the shoulders during PHA with shoulder abduction of 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120°. [Results] Activity of the UT, MT, and LT significantly increased as the shoulder abduction angle increased during PHA. There was a significant difference only in the activity of the LT, with change in shoulder rotation. In addition, the muscle activity of the LT was highest during shoulder IR at 120°. [Conclusion] Although activity of the LT was the highest during IR at 120 abduction, PHA accompanied by ER at an abduction angle of 120° would be effective at eliciting high activity in the LT when PHA is performed. Nonetheless, at an early stage of rehabilitation, PHA accompanied by ER at low abduction angles of 30° and 60° would be desirable to elicit low activity of the UT and high activity of the LT. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2015-01-09 2015-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4305608/ /pubmed/25642047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.97 Text en 2015©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lim, Jin Yong
Lee, Jung Seok
Mun, Byeong Mu
Kim, Tae Ho
A comparison of trapezius muscle activities of different shoulder abduction angles and rotation conditions during prone horizontal abduction
title A comparison of trapezius muscle activities of different shoulder abduction angles and rotation conditions during prone horizontal abduction
title_full A comparison of trapezius muscle activities of different shoulder abduction angles and rotation conditions during prone horizontal abduction
title_fullStr A comparison of trapezius muscle activities of different shoulder abduction angles and rotation conditions during prone horizontal abduction
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of trapezius muscle activities of different shoulder abduction angles and rotation conditions during prone horizontal abduction
title_short A comparison of trapezius muscle activities of different shoulder abduction angles and rotation conditions during prone horizontal abduction
title_sort comparison of trapezius muscle activities of different shoulder abduction angles and rotation conditions during prone horizontal abduction
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4305608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25642047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.97
work_keys_str_mv AT limjinyong acomparisonoftrapeziusmuscleactivitiesofdifferentshoulderabductionanglesandrotationconditionsduringpronehorizontalabduction
AT leejungseok acomparisonoftrapeziusmuscleactivitiesofdifferentshoulderabductionanglesandrotationconditionsduringpronehorizontalabduction
AT munbyeongmu acomparisonoftrapeziusmuscleactivitiesofdifferentshoulderabductionanglesandrotationconditionsduringpronehorizontalabduction
AT kimtaeho acomparisonoftrapeziusmuscleactivitiesofdifferentshoulderabductionanglesandrotationconditionsduringpronehorizontalabduction
AT limjinyong comparisonoftrapeziusmuscleactivitiesofdifferentshoulderabductionanglesandrotationconditionsduringpronehorizontalabduction
AT leejungseok comparisonoftrapeziusmuscleactivitiesofdifferentshoulderabductionanglesandrotationconditionsduringpronehorizontalabduction
AT munbyeongmu comparisonoftrapeziusmuscleactivitiesofdifferentshoulderabductionanglesandrotationconditionsduringpronehorizontalabduction
AT kimtaeho comparisonoftrapeziusmuscleactivitiesofdifferentshoulderabductionanglesandrotationconditionsduringpronehorizontalabduction