Cargando…
A Methylene Blue–assisted Technique for Harvesting Lymph Nodes After Radical Surgery for Gastric Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study
Harvesting lymph nodes (LNs) after gastrectomy is essential for accurate staging. This trial evaluated the efficiency and quality of a conventional method and a methylene blue–assisted method in a randomized manner. The key eligibility criteria were as follows: (i) histologically proven adenocarcino...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Raven Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4306537/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25356528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000336 |
_version_ | 1782354341681692672 |
---|---|
author | Aoyama, Toru Fujikawa, Hirohito Cho, Haruhiko Ogata, Takashi Shirai, Junya Hayashi, Tsutomu Rino, Yasushi Masuda, Munetaka Oba, Mari S. Morita, Satoshi Yoshikawa, Takaki |
author_facet | Aoyama, Toru Fujikawa, Hirohito Cho, Haruhiko Ogata, Takashi Shirai, Junya Hayashi, Tsutomu Rino, Yasushi Masuda, Munetaka Oba, Mari S. Morita, Satoshi Yoshikawa, Takaki |
author_sort | Aoyama, Toru |
collection | PubMed |
description | Harvesting lymph nodes (LNs) after gastrectomy is essential for accurate staging. This trial evaluated the efficiency and quality of a conventional method and a methylene blue–assisted method in a randomized manner. The key eligibility criteria were as follows: (i) histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the stomach; (ii) clinical stage I-III; (iii) R0 resection planned by gastrectomy with D1+ or D2 lymphadenectomy. The primary endpoint was the ratio of the pathologic number of harvested LNs per time (minutes) as an efficacy measure. The secondary endpoint was the number of harvested LNs, as a quality measure. Between August 2012 and December 2012, 60 patients were assigned to undergo treatment using the conventional method (n=29) and the methylene blue dye method (n=31). The baseline demographics were mostly well balanced between the 2 groups. The number of harvested LNs (mean±SD) was 33.6±11.9 in the conventional arm and 43.4±13.9 in the methylene blue arm (P=0.005). The ratio of the number of the harvested LNs per time was 1.12±0.46 LNs/min in the conventional arm and 1.49±0.59 LNs/min in the methylene blue arm (P=0.010). In the subgroup analyses, the quality and efficacy were both superior for the methylene blue dye method compared with the conventional method. The methylene blue technique is recommended for harvesting LNs during gastric cancer surgery on the basis of both the quality and efficacy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4306537 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Raven Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43065372015-01-27 A Methylene Blue–assisted Technique for Harvesting Lymph Nodes After Radical Surgery for Gastric Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study Aoyama, Toru Fujikawa, Hirohito Cho, Haruhiko Ogata, Takashi Shirai, Junya Hayashi, Tsutomu Rino, Yasushi Masuda, Munetaka Oba, Mari S. Morita, Satoshi Yoshikawa, Takaki Am J Surg Pathol Original Articles Harvesting lymph nodes (LNs) after gastrectomy is essential for accurate staging. This trial evaluated the efficiency and quality of a conventional method and a methylene blue–assisted method in a randomized manner. The key eligibility criteria were as follows: (i) histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the stomach; (ii) clinical stage I-III; (iii) R0 resection planned by gastrectomy with D1+ or D2 lymphadenectomy. The primary endpoint was the ratio of the pathologic number of harvested LNs per time (minutes) as an efficacy measure. The secondary endpoint was the number of harvested LNs, as a quality measure. Between August 2012 and December 2012, 60 patients were assigned to undergo treatment using the conventional method (n=29) and the methylene blue dye method (n=31). The baseline demographics were mostly well balanced between the 2 groups. The number of harvested LNs (mean±SD) was 33.6±11.9 in the conventional arm and 43.4±13.9 in the methylene blue arm (P=0.005). The ratio of the number of the harvested LNs per time was 1.12±0.46 LNs/min in the conventional arm and 1.49±0.59 LNs/min in the methylene blue arm (P=0.010). In the subgroup analyses, the quality and efficacy were both superior for the methylene blue dye method compared with the conventional method. The methylene blue technique is recommended for harvesting LNs during gastric cancer surgery on the basis of both the quality and efficacy. Raven Press 2015-02 2015-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4306537/ /pubmed/25356528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000336 Text en Copyright © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Aoyama, Toru Fujikawa, Hirohito Cho, Haruhiko Ogata, Takashi Shirai, Junya Hayashi, Tsutomu Rino, Yasushi Masuda, Munetaka Oba, Mari S. Morita, Satoshi Yoshikawa, Takaki A Methylene Blue–assisted Technique for Harvesting Lymph Nodes After Radical Surgery for Gastric Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study |
title | A Methylene Blue–assisted Technique for Harvesting Lymph Nodes After Radical Surgery for Gastric Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study |
title_full | A Methylene Blue–assisted Technique for Harvesting Lymph Nodes After Radical Surgery for Gastric Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study |
title_fullStr | A Methylene Blue–assisted Technique for Harvesting Lymph Nodes After Radical Surgery for Gastric Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study |
title_full_unstemmed | A Methylene Blue–assisted Technique for Harvesting Lymph Nodes After Radical Surgery for Gastric Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study |
title_short | A Methylene Blue–assisted Technique for Harvesting Lymph Nodes After Radical Surgery for Gastric Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study |
title_sort | methylene blue–assisted technique for harvesting lymph nodes after radical surgery for gastric cancer: a prospective, randomized, controlled study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4306537/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25356528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000336 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aoyamatoru amethyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT fujikawahirohito amethyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT choharuhiko amethyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT ogatatakashi amethyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT shiraijunya amethyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT hayashitsutomu amethyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT rinoyasushi amethyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT masudamunetaka amethyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT obamaris amethyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT moritasatoshi amethyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT yoshikawatakaki amethyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT aoyamatoru methyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT fujikawahirohito methyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT choharuhiko methyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT ogatatakashi methyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT shiraijunya methyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT hayashitsutomu methyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT rinoyasushi methyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT masudamunetaka methyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT obamaris methyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT moritasatoshi methyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT yoshikawatakaki methyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy |