Cargando…

A Methylene Blue–assisted Technique for Harvesting Lymph Nodes After Radical Surgery for Gastric Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study

Harvesting lymph nodes (LNs) after gastrectomy is essential for accurate staging. This trial evaluated the efficiency and quality of a conventional method and a methylene blue–assisted method in a randomized manner. The key eligibility criteria were as follows: (i) histologically proven adenocarcino...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aoyama, Toru, Fujikawa, Hirohito, Cho, Haruhiko, Ogata, Takashi, Shirai, Junya, Hayashi, Tsutomu, Rino, Yasushi, Masuda, Munetaka, Oba, Mari S., Morita, Satoshi, Yoshikawa, Takaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Raven Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4306537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25356528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000336
_version_ 1782354341681692672
author Aoyama, Toru
Fujikawa, Hirohito
Cho, Haruhiko
Ogata, Takashi
Shirai, Junya
Hayashi, Tsutomu
Rino, Yasushi
Masuda, Munetaka
Oba, Mari S.
Morita, Satoshi
Yoshikawa, Takaki
author_facet Aoyama, Toru
Fujikawa, Hirohito
Cho, Haruhiko
Ogata, Takashi
Shirai, Junya
Hayashi, Tsutomu
Rino, Yasushi
Masuda, Munetaka
Oba, Mari S.
Morita, Satoshi
Yoshikawa, Takaki
author_sort Aoyama, Toru
collection PubMed
description Harvesting lymph nodes (LNs) after gastrectomy is essential for accurate staging. This trial evaluated the efficiency and quality of a conventional method and a methylene blue–assisted method in a randomized manner. The key eligibility criteria were as follows: (i) histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the stomach; (ii) clinical stage I-III; (iii) R0 resection planned by gastrectomy with D1+ or D2 lymphadenectomy. The primary endpoint was the ratio of the pathologic number of harvested LNs per time (minutes) as an efficacy measure. The secondary endpoint was the number of harvested LNs, as a quality measure. Between August 2012 and December 2012, 60 patients were assigned to undergo treatment using the conventional method (n=29) and the methylene blue dye method (n=31). The baseline demographics were mostly well balanced between the 2 groups. The number of harvested LNs (mean±SD) was 33.6±11.9 in the conventional arm and 43.4±13.9 in the methylene blue arm (P=0.005). The ratio of the number of the harvested LNs per time was 1.12±0.46 LNs/min in the conventional arm and 1.49±0.59 LNs/min in the methylene blue arm (P=0.010). In the subgroup analyses, the quality and efficacy were both superior for the methylene blue dye method compared with the conventional method. The methylene blue technique is recommended for harvesting LNs during gastric cancer surgery on the basis of both the quality and efficacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4306537
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Raven Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43065372015-01-27 A Methylene Blue–assisted Technique for Harvesting Lymph Nodes After Radical Surgery for Gastric Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study Aoyama, Toru Fujikawa, Hirohito Cho, Haruhiko Ogata, Takashi Shirai, Junya Hayashi, Tsutomu Rino, Yasushi Masuda, Munetaka Oba, Mari S. Morita, Satoshi Yoshikawa, Takaki Am J Surg Pathol Original Articles Harvesting lymph nodes (LNs) after gastrectomy is essential for accurate staging. This trial evaluated the efficiency and quality of a conventional method and a methylene blue–assisted method in a randomized manner. The key eligibility criteria were as follows: (i) histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the stomach; (ii) clinical stage I-III; (iii) R0 resection planned by gastrectomy with D1+ or D2 lymphadenectomy. The primary endpoint was the ratio of the pathologic number of harvested LNs per time (minutes) as an efficacy measure. The secondary endpoint was the number of harvested LNs, as a quality measure. Between August 2012 and December 2012, 60 patients were assigned to undergo treatment using the conventional method (n=29) and the methylene blue dye method (n=31). The baseline demographics were mostly well balanced between the 2 groups. The number of harvested LNs (mean±SD) was 33.6±11.9 in the conventional arm and 43.4±13.9 in the methylene blue arm (P=0.005). The ratio of the number of the harvested LNs per time was 1.12±0.46 LNs/min in the conventional arm and 1.49±0.59 LNs/min in the methylene blue arm (P=0.010). In the subgroup analyses, the quality and efficacy were both superior for the methylene blue dye method compared with the conventional method. The methylene blue technique is recommended for harvesting LNs during gastric cancer surgery on the basis of both the quality and efficacy. Raven Press 2015-02 2015-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4306537/ /pubmed/25356528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000336 Text en Copyright © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Aoyama, Toru
Fujikawa, Hirohito
Cho, Haruhiko
Ogata, Takashi
Shirai, Junya
Hayashi, Tsutomu
Rino, Yasushi
Masuda, Munetaka
Oba, Mari S.
Morita, Satoshi
Yoshikawa, Takaki
A Methylene Blue–assisted Technique for Harvesting Lymph Nodes After Radical Surgery for Gastric Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study
title A Methylene Blue–assisted Technique for Harvesting Lymph Nodes After Radical Surgery for Gastric Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study
title_full A Methylene Blue–assisted Technique for Harvesting Lymph Nodes After Radical Surgery for Gastric Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study
title_fullStr A Methylene Blue–assisted Technique for Harvesting Lymph Nodes After Radical Surgery for Gastric Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study
title_full_unstemmed A Methylene Blue–assisted Technique for Harvesting Lymph Nodes After Radical Surgery for Gastric Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study
title_short A Methylene Blue–assisted Technique for Harvesting Lymph Nodes After Radical Surgery for Gastric Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study
title_sort methylene blue–assisted technique for harvesting lymph nodes after radical surgery for gastric cancer: a prospective, randomized, controlled study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4306537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25356528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000336
work_keys_str_mv AT aoyamatoru amethyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT fujikawahirohito amethyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT choharuhiko amethyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT ogatatakashi amethyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT shiraijunya amethyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT hayashitsutomu amethyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT rinoyasushi amethyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT masudamunetaka amethyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT obamaris amethyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT moritasatoshi amethyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT yoshikawatakaki amethyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT aoyamatoru methyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT fujikawahirohito methyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT choharuhiko methyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT ogatatakashi methyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT shiraijunya methyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT hayashitsutomu methyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT rinoyasushi methyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT masudamunetaka methyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT obamaris methyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT moritasatoshi methyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT yoshikawatakaki methyleneblueassistedtechniqueforharvestinglymphnodesafterradicalsurgeryforgastriccanceraprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy