Cargando…

Clinical Outcomes and Cost Effectiveness of Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol in a Chest Pain Center Compared with Routine Care of Patients with Chest Pain

AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare in patients presenting with acute chest pain the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of an accelerated diagnostic protocol utilizing contemporary technology in a chest pain unit versus routine care in an internal medicine department. METHODS AND RESULT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Asher, Elad, Reuveni, Haim, Shlomo, Nir, Gerber, Yariv, Beigel, Roy, Narodetski, Michael, Eldar, Michael, Or, Jacob, Hod, Hanoch, Shamiss, Arie, Matetzky, Shlomi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4306554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25622029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117287
_version_ 1782354345808887808
author Asher, Elad
Reuveni, Haim
Shlomo, Nir
Gerber, Yariv
Beigel, Roy
Narodetski, Michael
Eldar, Michael
Or, Jacob
Hod, Hanoch
Shamiss, Arie
Matetzky, Shlomi
author_facet Asher, Elad
Reuveni, Haim
Shlomo, Nir
Gerber, Yariv
Beigel, Roy
Narodetski, Michael
Eldar, Michael
Or, Jacob
Hod, Hanoch
Shamiss, Arie
Matetzky, Shlomi
author_sort Asher, Elad
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare in patients presenting with acute chest pain the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of an accelerated diagnostic protocol utilizing contemporary technology in a chest pain unit versus routine care in an internal medicine department. METHODS AND RESULTS: Hospital and 90-day course were prospectively studied in 585 consecutive low-moderate risk acute chest pain patients, of whom 304 were investigated in a designated chest pain center using a pre-specified accelerated diagnostic protocol, while 281 underwent routine care in an internal medicine ward. Hospitalization was longer in the routine care compared with the accelerated diagnostic protocol group (p<0.001). During hospitalization, 298 accelerated diagnostic protocol patients (98%) vs. 57 (20%) routine care patients underwent non-invasive testing, (p<0.001). Throughout the 90-day follow-up, diagnostic imaging testing was performed in 125 (44%) and 26 (9%) patients in the routine care and accelerated diagnostic protocol patients, respectively (p<0.001). Ultimately, most patients in both groups had non-invasive imaging testing. Accelerated diagnostic protocol patients compared with those receiving routine care was associated with a lower incidence of readmissions for chest pain [8 (3%) vs. 24 (9%), p<0.01], and acute coronary syndromes [1 (0.3%) vs. 9 (3.2%), p<0.01], during the follow-up period. The accelerated diagnostic protocol remained a predictor of lower acute coronary syndromes and readmissions after propensity score analysis [OR = 0.28 (CI 95% 0.14–0.59)]. Cost per patient was similar in both groups [($2510 vs. $2703 for the accelerated diagnostic protocol and routine care group, respectively, (p = 0.9)]. CONCLUSION: An accelerated diagnostic protocol is clinically superior and as cost effective as routine in acute chest pain patients, and may save time and resources.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4306554
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43065542015-01-30 Clinical Outcomes and Cost Effectiveness of Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol in a Chest Pain Center Compared with Routine Care of Patients with Chest Pain Asher, Elad Reuveni, Haim Shlomo, Nir Gerber, Yariv Beigel, Roy Narodetski, Michael Eldar, Michael Or, Jacob Hod, Hanoch Shamiss, Arie Matetzky, Shlomi PLoS One Research Article AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare in patients presenting with acute chest pain the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of an accelerated diagnostic protocol utilizing contemporary technology in a chest pain unit versus routine care in an internal medicine department. METHODS AND RESULTS: Hospital and 90-day course were prospectively studied in 585 consecutive low-moderate risk acute chest pain patients, of whom 304 were investigated in a designated chest pain center using a pre-specified accelerated diagnostic protocol, while 281 underwent routine care in an internal medicine ward. Hospitalization was longer in the routine care compared with the accelerated diagnostic protocol group (p<0.001). During hospitalization, 298 accelerated diagnostic protocol patients (98%) vs. 57 (20%) routine care patients underwent non-invasive testing, (p<0.001). Throughout the 90-day follow-up, diagnostic imaging testing was performed in 125 (44%) and 26 (9%) patients in the routine care and accelerated diagnostic protocol patients, respectively (p<0.001). Ultimately, most patients in both groups had non-invasive imaging testing. Accelerated diagnostic protocol patients compared with those receiving routine care was associated with a lower incidence of readmissions for chest pain [8 (3%) vs. 24 (9%), p<0.01], and acute coronary syndromes [1 (0.3%) vs. 9 (3.2%), p<0.01], during the follow-up period. The accelerated diagnostic protocol remained a predictor of lower acute coronary syndromes and readmissions after propensity score analysis [OR = 0.28 (CI 95% 0.14–0.59)]. Cost per patient was similar in both groups [($2510 vs. $2703 for the accelerated diagnostic protocol and routine care group, respectively, (p = 0.9)]. CONCLUSION: An accelerated diagnostic protocol is clinically superior and as cost effective as routine in acute chest pain patients, and may save time and resources. Public Library of Science 2015-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4306554/ /pubmed/25622029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117287 Text en © 2015 Asher et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Asher, Elad
Reuveni, Haim
Shlomo, Nir
Gerber, Yariv
Beigel, Roy
Narodetski, Michael
Eldar, Michael
Or, Jacob
Hod, Hanoch
Shamiss, Arie
Matetzky, Shlomi
Clinical Outcomes and Cost Effectiveness of Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol in a Chest Pain Center Compared with Routine Care of Patients with Chest Pain
title Clinical Outcomes and Cost Effectiveness of Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol in a Chest Pain Center Compared with Routine Care of Patients with Chest Pain
title_full Clinical Outcomes and Cost Effectiveness of Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol in a Chest Pain Center Compared with Routine Care of Patients with Chest Pain
title_fullStr Clinical Outcomes and Cost Effectiveness of Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol in a Chest Pain Center Compared with Routine Care of Patients with Chest Pain
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Outcomes and Cost Effectiveness of Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol in a Chest Pain Center Compared with Routine Care of Patients with Chest Pain
title_short Clinical Outcomes and Cost Effectiveness of Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol in a Chest Pain Center Compared with Routine Care of Patients with Chest Pain
title_sort clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness of accelerated diagnostic protocol in a chest pain center compared with routine care of patients with chest pain
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4306554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25622029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117287
work_keys_str_mv AT asherelad clinicaloutcomesandcosteffectivenessofaccelerateddiagnosticprotocolinachestpaincentercomparedwithroutinecareofpatientswithchestpain
AT reuvenihaim clinicaloutcomesandcosteffectivenessofaccelerateddiagnosticprotocolinachestpaincentercomparedwithroutinecareofpatientswithchestpain
AT shlomonir clinicaloutcomesandcosteffectivenessofaccelerateddiagnosticprotocolinachestpaincentercomparedwithroutinecareofpatientswithchestpain
AT gerberyariv clinicaloutcomesandcosteffectivenessofaccelerateddiagnosticprotocolinachestpaincentercomparedwithroutinecareofpatientswithchestpain
AT beigelroy clinicaloutcomesandcosteffectivenessofaccelerateddiagnosticprotocolinachestpaincentercomparedwithroutinecareofpatientswithchestpain
AT narodetskimichael clinicaloutcomesandcosteffectivenessofaccelerateddiagnosticprotocolinachestpaincentercomparedwithroutinecareofpatientswithchestpain
AT eldarmichael clinicaloutcomesandcosteffectivenessofaccelerateddiagnosticprotocolinachestpaincentercomparedwithroutinecareofpatientswithchestpain
AT orjacob clinicaloutcomesandcosteffectivenessofaccelerateddiagnosticprotocolinachestpaincentercomparedwithroutinecareofpatientswithchestpain
AT hodhanoch clinicaloutcomesandcosteffectivenessofaccelerateddiagnosticprotocolinachestpaincentercomparedwithroutinecareofpatientswithchestpain
AT shamissarie clinicaloutcomesandcosteffectivenessofaccelerateddiagnosticprotocolinachestpaincentercomparedwithroutinecareofpatientswithchestpain
AT matetzkyshlomi clinicaloutcomesandcosteffectivenessofaccelerateddiagnosticprotocolinachestpaincentercomparedwithroutinecareofpatientswithchestpain