Cargando…
Clinical Outcomes and Cost Effectiveness of Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol in a Chest Pain Center Compared with Routine Care of Patients with Chest Pain
AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare in patients presenting with acute chest pain the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of an accelerated diagnostic protocol utilizing contemporary technology in a chest pain unit versus routine care in an internal medicine department. METHODS AND RESULT...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4306554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25622029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117287 |
_version_ | 1782354345808887808 |
---|---|
author | Asher, Elad Reuveni, Haim Shlomo, Nir Gerber, Yariv Beigel, Roy Narodetski, Michael Eldar, Michael Or, Jacob Hod, Hanoch Shamiss, Arie Matetzky, Shlomi |
author_facet | Asher, Elad Reuveni, Haim Shlomo, Nir Gerber, Yariv Beigel, Roy Narodetski, Michael Eldar, Michael Or, Jacob Hod, Hanoch Shamiss, Arie Matetzky, Shlomi |
author_sort | Asher, Elad |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare in patients presenting with acute chest pain the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of an accelerated diagnostic protocol utilizing contemporary technology in a chest pain unit versus routine care in an internal medicine department. METHODS AND RESULTS: Hospital and 90-day course were prospectively studied in 585 consecutive low-moderate risk acute chest pain patients, of whom 304 were investigated in a designated chest pain center using a pre-specified accelerated diagnostic protocol, while 281 underwent routine care in an internal medicine ward. Hospitalization was longer in the routine care compared with the accelerated diagnostic protocol group (p<0.001). During hospitalization, 298 accelerated diagnostic protocol patients (98%) vs. 57 (20%) routine care patients underwent non-invasive testing, (p<0.001). Throughout the 90-day follow-up, diagnostic imaging testing was performed in 125 (44%) and 26 (9%) patients in the routine care and accelerated diagnostic protocol patients, respectively (p<0.001). Ultimately, most patients in both groups had non-invasive imaging testing. Accelerated diagnostic protocol patients compared with those receiving routine care was associated with a lower incidence of readmissions for chest pain [8 (3%) vs. 24 (9%), p<0.01], and acute coronary syndromes [1 (0.3%) vs. 9 (3.2%), p<0.01], during the follow-up period. The accelerated diagnostic protocol remained a predictor of lower acute coronary syndromes and readmissions after propensity score analysis [OR = 0.28 (CI 95% 0.14–0.59)]. Cost per patient was similar in both groups [($2510 vs. $2703 for the accelerated diagnostic protocol and routine care group, respectively, (p = 0.9)]. CONCLUSION: An accelerated diagnostic protocol is clinically superior and as cost effective as routine in acute chest pain patients, and may save time and resources. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4306554 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43065542015-01-30 Clinical Outcomes and Cost Effectiveness of Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol in a Chest Pain Center Compared with Routine Care of Patients with Chest Pain Asher, Elad Reuveni, Haim Shlomo, Nir Gerber, Yariv Beigel, Roy Narodetski, Michael Eldar, Michael Or, Jacob Hod, Hanoch Shamiss, Arie Matetzky, Shlomi PLoS One Research Article AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare in patients presenting with acute chest pain the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of an accelerated diagnostic protocol utilizing contemporary technology in a chest pain unit versus routine care in an internal medicine department. METHODS AND RESULTS: Hospital and 90-day course were prospectively studied in 585 consecutive low-moderate risk acute chest pain patients, of whom 304 were investigated in a designated chest pain center using a pre-specified accelerated diagnostic protocol, while 281 underwent routine care in an internal medicine ward. Hospitalization was longer in the routine care compared with the accelerated diagnostic protocol group (p<0.001). During hospitalization, 298 accelerated diagnostic protocol patients (98%) vs. 57 (20%) routine care patients underwent non-invasive testing, (p<0.001). Throughout the 90-day follow-up, diagnostic imaging testing was performed in 125 (44%) and 26 (9%) patients in the routine care and accelerated diagnostic protocol patients, respectively (p<0.001). Ultimately, most patients in both groups had non-invasive imaging testing. Accelerated diagnostic protocol patients compared with those receiving routine care was associated with a lower incidence of readmissions for chest pain [8 (3%) vs. 24 (9%), p<0.01], and acute coronary syndromes [1 (0.3%) vs. 9 (3.2%), p<0.01], during the follow-up period. The accelerated diagnostic protocol remained a predictor of lower acute coronary syndromes and readmissions after propensity score analysis [OR = 0.28 (CI 95% 0.14–0.59)]. Cost per patient was similar in both groups [($2510 vs. $2703 for the accelerated diagnostic protocol and routine care group, respectively, (p = 0.9)]. CONCLUSION: An accelerated diagnostic protocol is clinically superior and as cost effective as routine in acute chest pain patients, and may save time and resources. Public Library of Science 2015-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4306554/ /pubmed/25622029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117287 Text en © 2015 Asher et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Asher, Elad Reuveni, Haim Shlomo, Nir Gerber, Yariv Beigel, Roy Narodetski, Michael Eldar, Michael Or, Jacob Hod, Hanoch Shamiss, Arie Matetzky, Shlomi Clinical Outcomes and Cost Effectiveness of Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol in a Chest Pain Center Compared with Routine Care of Patients with Chest Pain |
title | Clinical Outcomes and Cost Effectiveness of Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol in a Chest Pain Center Compared with Routine Care of Patients with Chest Pain |
title_full | Clinical Outcomes and Cost Effectiveness of Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol in a Chest Pain Center Compared with Routine Care of Patients with Chest Pain |
title_fullStr | Clinical Outcomes and Cost Effectiveness of Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol in a Chest Pain Center Compared with Routine Care of Patients with Chest Pain |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Outcomes and Cost Effectiveness of Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol in a Chest Pain Center Compared with Routine Care of Patients with Chest Pain |
title_short | Clinical Outcomes and Cost Effectiveness of Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol in a Chest Pain Center Compared with Routine Care of Patients with Chest Pain |
title_sort | clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness of accelerated diagnostic protocol in a chest pain center compared with routine care of patients with chest pain |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4306554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25622029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117287 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT asherelad clinicaloutcomesandcosteffectivenessofaccelerateddiagnosticprotocolinachestpaincentercomparedwithroutinecareofpatientswithchestpain AT reuvenihaim clinicaloutcomesandcosteffectivenessofaccelerateddiagnosticprotocolinachestpaincentercomparedwithroutinecareofpatientswithchestpain AT shlomonir clinicaloutcomesandcosteffectivenessofaccelerateddiagnosticprotocolinachestpaincentercomparedwithroutinecareofpatientswithchestpain AT gerberyariv clinicaloutcomesandcosteffectivenessofaccelerateddiagnosticprotocolinachestpaincentercomparedwithroutinecareofpatientswithchestpain AT beigelroy clinicaloutcomesandcosteffectivenessofaccelerateddiagnosticprotocolinachestpaincentercomparedwithroutinecareofpatientswithchestpain AT narodetskimichael clinicaloutcomesandcosteffectivenessofaccelerateddiagnosticprotocolinachestpaincentercomparedwithroutinecareofpatientswithchestpain AT eldarmichael clinicaloutcomesandcosteffectivenessofaccelerateddiagnosticprotocolinachestpaincentercomparedwithroutinecareofpatientswithchestpain AT orjacob clinicaloutcomesandcosteffectivenessofaccelerateddiagnosticprotocolinachestpaincentercomparedwithroutinecareofpatientswithchestpain AT hodhanoch clinicaloutcomesandcosteffectivenessofaccelerateddiagnosticprotocolinachestpaincentercomparedwithroutinecareofpatientswithchestpain AT shamissarie clinicaloutcomesandcosteffectivenessofaccelerateddiagnosticprotocolinachestpaincentercomparedwithroutinecareofpatientswithchestpain AT matetzkyshlomi clinicaloutcomesandcosteffectivenessofaccelerateddiagnosticprotocolinachestpaincentercomparedwithroutinecareofpatientswithchestpain |