Cargando…

A Review of Lawsuits Related to Point-of-Care Emergency Ultrasound Applications

INTRODUCTION: New medical technology brings the potential of lawsuits related to the usage of that new technology. In recent years the use of point-of-care (POC) ultrasound has increased rapidly in the emergency department (ED). POC ultrasound creates potential legal risk to an emergency physician (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stolz, Lori, O’Brien, Kathleen M., Miller, Marc L., Winters-Brown, Nicole D., Blaivas, Michael, Adhikari, Srikar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4307691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25671000
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2014.11.23592
_version_ 1782354478749450240
author Stolz, Lori
O’Brien, Kathleen M.
Miller, Marc L.
Winters-Brown, Nicole D.
Blaivas, Michael
Adhikari, Srikar
author_facet Stolz, Lori
O’Brien, Kathleen M.
Miller, Marc L.
Winters-Brown, Nicole D.
Blaivas, Michael
Adhikari, Srikar
author_sort Stolz, Lori
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: New medical technology brings the potential of lawsuits related to the usage of that new technology. In recent years the use of point-of-care (POC) ultrasound has increased rapidly in the emergency department (ED). POC ultrasound creates potential legal risk to an emergency physician (EP) either using or not using this tool. The aim of this study was to quantify and characterize reported decisions in lawsuits related to EPs performing POC ultrasound. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all United States reported state and federal cases in the Westlaw database. We assessed the full text of reported cases between January 2008 and December 2012. EPs with emergency ultrasound fellowship training reviewed the full text of each case. Cases were included if an EP was named, the patient encounter was in the emergency department, the interpretation or failure to perform an ultrasound was a central issue and the application was within the American College of Emergency Physician (ACEP) ultrasound core applications. In order to assess deferred risk, cases that involved ultrasound examinations that could have been performed by an EP but were deferred to radiology were included. RESULTS: We identified five cases. All reported decisions alleged a failure to perform an ultrasound study or a failure to perform it in a timely manner. All studies were within the scope of emergency medicine and were ACEP emergency ultrasound core applications. A majority of cases (n=4) resulted in a patient death. There were no reported cases of failure to interpret or misdiagnoses. CONCLUSION: In a five-year period from January 2008 through December 2012, five malpractice cases involving EPs and ultrasound examinations that are ACEP core emergency ultrasound applications were documented in the Westlaw database. All cases were related to failure to perform an ultrasound study or failure to perform a study in a timely manner and none involved failure to interpret or misdiagnosis when using of POC ultrasound.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4307691
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43076912015-02-10 A Review of Lawsuits Related to Point-of-Care Emergency Ultrasound Applications Stolz, Lori O’Brien, Kathleen M. Miller, Marc L. Winters-Brown, Nicole D. Blaivas, Michael Adhikari, Srikar West J Emerg Med Ethical and Legal INTRODUCTION: New medical technology brings the potential of lawsuits related to the usage of that new technology. In recent years the use of point-of-care (POC) ultrasound has increased rapidly in the emergency department (ED). POC ultrasound creates potential legal risk to an emergency physician (EP) either using or not using this tool. The aim of this study was to quantify and characterize reported decisions in lawsuits related to EPs performing POC ultrasound. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all United States reported state and federal cases in the Westlaw database. We assessed the full text of reported cases between January 2008 and December 2012. EPs with emergency ultrasound fellowship training reviewed the full text of each case. Cases were included if an EP was named, the patient encounter was in the emergency department, the interpretation or failure to perform an ultrasound was a central issue and the application was within the American College of Emergency Physician (ACEP) ultrasound core applications. In order to assess deferred risk, cases that involved ultrasound examinations that could have been performed by an EP but were deferred to radiology were included. RESULTS: We identified five cases. All reported decisions alleged a failure to perform an ultrasound study or a failure to perform it in a timely manner. All studies were within the scope of emergency medicine and were ACEP emergency ultrasound core applications. A majority of cases (n=4) resulted in a patient death. There were no reported cases of failure to interpret or misdiagnoses. CONCLUSION: In a five-year period from January 2008 through December 2012, five malpractice cases involving EPs and ultrasound examinations that are ACEP core emergency ultrasound applications were documented in the Westlaw database. All cases were related to failure to perform an ultrasound study or failure to perform a study in a timely manner and none involved failure to interpret or misdiagnosis when using of POC ultrasound. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2015-01 2014-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4307691/ /pubmed/25671000 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2014.11.23592 Text en Copyright © 2015 the authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Ethical and Legal
Stolz, Lori
O’Brien, Kathleen M.
Miller, Marc L.
Winters-Brown, Nicole D.
Blaivas, Michael
Adhikari, Srikar
A Review of Lawsuits Related to Point-of-Care Emergency Ultrasound Applications
title A Review of Lawsuits Related to Point-of-Care Emergency Ultrasound Applications
title_full A Review of Lawsuits Related to Point-of-Care Emergency Ultrasound Applications
title_fullStr A Review of Lawsuits Related to Point-of-Care Emergency Ultrasound Applications
title_full_unstemmed A Review of Lawsuits Related to Point-of-Care Emergency Ultrasound Applications
title_short A Review of Lawsuits Related to Point-of-Care Emergency Ultrasound Applications
title_sort review of lawsuits related to point-of-care emergency ultrasound applications
topic Ethical and Legal
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4307691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25671000
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2014.11.23592
work_keys_str_mv AT stolzlori areviewoflawsuitsrelatedtopointofcareemergencyultrasoundapplications
AT obrienkathleenm areviewoflawsuitsrelatedtopointofcareemergencyultrasoundapplications
AT millermarcl areviewoflawsuitsrelatedtopointofcareemergencyultrasoundapplications
AT wintersbrownnicoled areviewoflawsuitsrelatedtopointofcareemergencyultrasoundapplications
AT blaivasmichael areviewoflawsuitsrelatedtopointofcareemergencyultrasoundapplications
AT adhikarisrikar areviewoflawsuitsrelatedtopointofcareemergencyultrasoundapplications
AT stolzlori reviewoflawsuitsrelatedtopointofcareemergencyultrasoundapplications
AT obrienkathleenm reviewoflawsuitsrelatedtopointofcareemergencyultrasoundapplications
AT millermarcl reviewoflawsuitsrelatedtopointofcareemergencyultrasoundapplications
AT wintersbrownnicoled reviewoflawsuitsrelatedtopointofcareemergencyultrasoundapplications
AT blaivasmichael reviewoflawsuitsrelatedtopointofcareemergencyultrasoundapplications
AT adhikarisrikar reviewoflawsuitsrelatedtopointofcareemergencyultrasoundapplications