Cargando…
Thickness and marking quality of different occlusal contact registration strips
OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the thickness and the marking quality of different occlusal contact registration strips (OCRS) and a possible correlation between them. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The following OCRS were selected: Accufilm II, BK20, BK21, BK22, BK23, BK28, and BK31. The thickness was measured in thre...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4307765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25591020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720140117 |
_version_ | 1782354495116673024 |
---|---|
author | TOLEDO, Maria Fernanda de Souza Mauá Serapião JÓIAS, Renata Pilli MARQUES-IASI, Yves Santini NEVES, Ana Christina Claro RODE, Sigmar de Mello |
author_facet | TOLEDO, Maria Fernanda de Souza Mauá Serapião JÓIAS, Renata Pilli MARQUES-IASI, Yves Santini NEVES, Ana Christina Claro RODE, Sigmar de Mello |
author_sort | TOLEDO, Maria Fernanda de Souza Mauá Serapião |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the thickness and the marking quality of different occlusal contact registration strips (OCRS) and a possible correlation between them. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The following OCRS were selected: Accufilm II, BK20, BK21, BK22, BK23, BK28, and BK31. The thickness was measured in three points of the OCRS with an electronic measuring device (TESA), and the mean was calculated. To produce the marks on the strips, composite resin specimens were adapted to a universal testing machine (Versat 2000) with 40 kgf load cell at a speed of 1.0 mm/min. The mark images were photographed with a stereoscopic microscope (Stemi SV11) and processed and analyzed by the 550-Leica Qwin(® )analyzer. RESULTS: Values (μm) found in the 1(st) and 2(nd) thickness measurements were: Accufilm II - 16.4 and 14.2; BK20 - 10.0 and 8.1; BK21 - 9.5 and 8.0; BK22 - 9.7 and 8.7; BK23 - 9.8 and 7.9; BK28 - 12.8 and 10.0; and BK31 - 8.4 and 8.0, respectively. The mean (mm(2)) values found in the mark areas were: Accufilm II - 0.078; BK20 - 0.035; BK21 - 0.045; BK22 - 0.012; BK23 - 0.022; BK28 - 0.024; and BK31 - 0.024. The results were submitted to the Kruskal-Wallis (p<0.05) and Pearson’s correlation tests. CONCLUSIONS: Only in the 2(nd) measurement, the OCRS thickness observed was similar to the value indicated by the manufacturers; the Accufilm II and the BK28 strips showed the better marks; and no correlation was found between the thickness and the marking area. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4307765 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43077652015-02-26 Thickness and marking quality of different occlusal contact registration strips TOLEDO, Maria Fernanda de Souza Mauá Serapião JÓIAS, Renata Pilli MARQUES-IASI, Yves Santini NEVES, Ana Christina Claro RODE, Sigmar de Mello J Appl Oral Sci Article OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the thickness and the marking quality of different occlusal contact registration strips (OCRS) and a possible correlation between them. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The following OCRS were selected: Accufilm II, BK20, BK21, BK22, BK23, BK28, and BK31. The thickness was measured in three points of the OCRS with an electronic measuring device (TESA), and the mean was calculated. To produce the marks on the strips, composite resin specimens were adapted to a universal testing machine (Versat 2000) with 40 kgf load cell at a speed of 1.0 mm/min. The mark images were photographed with a stereoscopic microscope (Stemi SV11) and processed and analyzed by the 550-Leica Qwin(® )analyzer. RESULTS: Values (μm) found in the 1(st) and 2(nd) thickness measurements were: Accufilm II - 16.4 and 14.2; BK20 - 10.0 and 8.1; BK21 - 9.5 and 8.0; BK22 - 9.7 and 8.7; BK23 - 9.8 and 7.9; BK28 - 12.8 and 10.0; and BK31 - 8.4 and 8.0, respectively. The mean (mm(2)) values found in the mark areas were: Accufilm II - 0.078; BK20 - 0.035; BK21 - 0.045; BK22 - 0.012; BK23 - 0.022; BK28 - 0.024; and BK31 - 0.024. The results were submitted to the Kruskal-Wallis (p<0.05) and Pearson’s correlation tests. CONCLUSIONS: Only in the 2(nd) measurement, the OCRS thickness observed was similar to the value indicated by the manufacturers; the Accufilm II and the BK28 strips showed the better marks; and no correlation was found between the thickness and the marking area. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4307765/ /pubmed/25591020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720140117 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article TOLEDO, Maria Fernanda de Souza Mauá Serapião JÓIAS, Renata Pilli MARQUES-IASI, Yves Santini NEVES, Ana Christina Claro RODE, Sigmar de Mello Thickness and marking quality of different occlusal contact registration strips |
title | Thickness and marking quality of different occlusal contact registration strips |
title_full | Thickness and marking quality of different occlusal contact registration strips |
title_fullStr | Thickness and marking quality of different occlusal contact registration strips |
title_full_unstemmed | Thickness and marking quality of different occlusal contact registration strips |
title_short | Thickness and marking quality of different occlusal contact registration strips |
title_sort | thickness and marking quality of different occlusal contact registration strips |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4307765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25591020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720140117 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT toledomariafernandadesouzamauaserapiao thicknessandmarkingqualityofdifferentocclusalcontactregistrationstrips AT joiasrenatapilli thicknessandmarkingqualityofdifferentocclusalcontactregistrationstrips AT marquesiasiyvessantini thicknessandmarkingqualityofdifferentocclusalcontactregistrationstrips AT nevesanachristinaclaro thicknessandmarkingqualityofdifferentocclusalcontactregistrationstrips AT rodesigmardemello thicknessandmarkingqualityofdifferentocclusalcontactregistrationstrips |