Cargando…

Thickness and marking quality of different occlusal contact registration strips

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the thickness and the marking quality of different occlusal contact registration strips (OCRS) and a possible correlation between them. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The following OCRS were selected: Accufilm II, BK20, BK21, BK22, BK23, BK28, and BK31. The thickness was measured in thre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: TOLEDO, Maria Fernanda de Souza Mauá Serapião, JÓIAS, Renata Pilli, MARQUES-IASI, Yves Santini, NEVES, Ana Christina Claro, RODE, Sigmar de Mello
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4307765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25591020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720140117
_version_ 1782354495116673024
author TOLEDO, Maria Fernanda de Souza Mauá Serapião
JÓIAS, Renata Pilli
MARQUES-IASI, Yves Santini
NEVES, Ana Christina Claro
RODE, Sigmar de Mello
author_facet TOLEDO, Maria Fernanda de Souza Mauá Serapião
JÓIAS, Renata Pilli
MARQUES-IASI, Yves Santini
NEVES, Ana Christina Claro
RODE, Sigmar de Mello
author_sort TOLEDO, Maria Fernanda de Souza Mauá Serapião
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the thickness and the marking quality of different occlusal contact registration strips (OCRS) and a possible correlation between them. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The following OCRS were selected: Accufilm II, BK20, BK21, BK22, BK23, BK28, and BK31. The thickness was measured in three points of the OCRS with an electronic measuring device (TESA), and the mean was calculated. To produce the marks on the strips, composite resin specimens were adapted to a universal testing machine (Versat 2000) with 40 kgf load cell at a speed of 1.0 mm/min. The mark images were photographed with a stereoscopic microscope (Stemi SV11) and processed and analyzed by the 550-Leica Qwin(® )analyzer. RESULTS: Values (μm) found in the 1(st) and 2(nd) thickness measurements were: Accufilm II - 16.4 and 14.2; BK20 - 10.0 and 8.1; BK21 - 9.5 and 8.0; BK22 - 9.7 and 8.7; BK23 - 9.8 and 7.9; BK28 - 12.8 and 10.0; and BK31 - 8.4 and 8.0, respectively. The mean (mm(2)) values found in the mark areas were: Accufilm II - 0.078; BK20 - 0.035; BK21 - 0.045; BK22 - 0.012; BK23 - 0.022; BK28 - 0.024; and BK31 - 0.024. The results were submitted to the Kruskal-Wallis (p<0.05) and Pearson’s correlation tests. CONCLUSIONS: Only in the 2(nd) measurement, the OCRS thickness observed was similar to the value indicated by the manufacturers; the Accufilm II and the BK28 strips showed the better marks; and no correlation was found between the thickness and the marking area.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4307765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43077652015-02-26 Thickness and marking quality of different occlusal contact registration strips TOLEDO, Maria Fernanda de Souza Mauá Serapião JÓIAS, Renata Pilli MARQUES-IASI, Yves Santini NEVES, Ana Christina Claro RODE, Sigmar de Mello J Appl Oral Sci Article OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the thickness and the marking quality of different occlusal contact registration strips (OCRS) and a possible correlation between them. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The following OCRS were selected: Accufilm II, BK20, BK21, BK22, BK23, BK28, and BK31. The thickness was measured in three points of the OCRS with an electronic measuring device (TESA), and the mean was calculated. To produce the marks on the strips, composite resin specimens were adapted to a universal testing machine (Versat 2000) with 40 kgf load cell at a speed of 1.0 mm/min. The mark images were photographed with a stereoscopic microscope (Stemi SV11) and processed and analyzed by the 550-Leica Qwin(® )analyzer. RESULTS: Values (μm) found in the 1(st) and 2(nd) thickness measurements were: Accufilm II - 16.4 and 14.2; BK20 - 10.0 and 8.1; BK21 - 9.5 and 8.0; BK22 - 9.7 and 8.7; BK23 - 9.8 and 7.9; BK28 - 12.8 and 10.0; and BK31 - 8.4 and 8.0, respectively. The mean (mm(2)) values found in the mark areas were: Accufilm II - 0.078; BK20 - 0.035; BK21 - 0.045; BK22 - 0.012; BK23 - 0.022; BK28 - 0.024; and BK31 - 0.024. The results were submitted to the Kruskal-Wallis (p<0.05) and Pearson’s correlation tests. CONCLUSIONS: Only in the 2(nd) measurement, the OCRS thickness observed was similar to the value indicated by the manufacturers; the Accufilm II and the BK28 strips showed the better marks; and no correlation was found between the thickness and the marking area. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4307765/ /pubmed/25591020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720140117 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
TOLEDO, Maria Fernanda de Souza Mauá Serapião
JÓIAS, Renata Pilli
MARQUES-IASI, Yves Santini
NEVES, Ana Christina Claro
RODE, Sigmar de Mello
Thickness and marking quality of different occlusal contact registration strips
title Thickness and marking quality of different occlusal contact registration strips
title_full Thickness and marking quality of different occlusal contact registration strips
title_fullStr Thickness and marking quality of different occlusal contact registration strips
title_full_unstemmed Thickness and marking quality of different occlusal contact registration strips
title_short Thickness and marking quality of different occlusal contact registration strips
title_sort thickness and marking quality of different occlusal contact registration strips
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4307765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25591020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720140117
work_keys_str_mv AT toledomariafernandadesouzamauaserapiao thicknessandmarkingqualityofdifferentocclusalcontactregistrationstrips
AT joiasrenatapilli thicknessandmarkingqualityofdifferentocclusalcontactregistrationstrips
AT marquesiasiyvessantini thicknessandmarkingqualityofdifferentocclusalcontactregistrationstrips
AT nevesanachristinaclaro thicknessandmarkingqualityofdifferentocclusalcontactregistrationstrips
AT rodesigmardemello thicknessandmarkingqualityofdifferentocclusalcontactregistrationstrips