Cargando…

How to Systematically Assess Serious Games Applied to Health Care

The usefulness and effectiveness of specific serious games in the medical domain is often unclear. This is caused by a lack of supporting evidence on validity of individual games, as well as a lack of publicly available information. Moreover, insufficient understanding of design principles among the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Graafland, Maurits, Dankbaar, Mary, Mert, Agali, Lagro, Joep, De Wit-Zuurendonk, Laura, Schuit, Stephanie, Schaafstal, Alma, Schijven, Marlies
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4307812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25654163
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/games.3825
_version_ 1782354498375647232
author Graafland, Maurits
Dankbaar, Mary
Mert, Agali
Lagro, Joep
De Wit-Zuurendonk, Laura
Schuit, Stephanie
Schaafstal, Alma
Schijven, Marlies
author_facet Graafland, Maurits
Dankbaar, Mary
Mert, Agali
Lagro, Joep
De Wit-Zuurendonk, Laura
Schuit, Stephanie
Schaafstal, Alma
Schijven, Marlies
author_sort Graafland, Maurits
collection PubMed
description The usefulness and effectiveness of specific serious games in the medical domain is often unclear. This is caused by a lack of supporting evidence on validity of individual games, as well as a lack of publicly available information. Moreover, insufficient understanding of design principles among the individuals and institutions that develop or apply a medical serious game compromises their use. This article provides the first consensus-based framework for the assessment of specific medical serious games. The framework provides 62 items in 5 main themes, aimed at assessing a serious game’s rationale, functionality, validity, and data safety. This will allow caregivers and educators to make balanced choices when applying a serious game for healthcare purposes. Furthermore, the framework provides game manufacturers with standards for the development of new, valid serious games.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4307812
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher JMIR Publications Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43078122015-02-03 How to Systematically Assess Serious Games Applied to Health Care Graafland, Maurits Dankbaar, Mary Mert, Agali Lagro, Joep De Wit-Zuurendonk, Laura Schuit, Stephanie Schaafstal, Alma Schijven, Marlies JMIR Serious Games Viewpoint The usefulness and effectiveness of specific serious games in the medical domain is often unclear. This is caused by a lack of supporting evidence on validity of individual games, as well as a lack of publicly available information. Moreover, insufficient understanding of design principles among the individuals and institutions that develop or apply a medical serious game compromises their use. This article provides the first consensus-based framework for the assessment of specific medical serious games. The framework provides 62 items in 5 main themes, aimed at assessing a serious game’s rationale, functionality, validity, and data safety. This will allow caregivers and educators to make balanced choices when applying a serious game for healthcare purposes. Furthermore, the framework provides game manufacturers with standards for the development of new, valid serious games. JMIR Publications Inc. 2014-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4307812/ /pubmed/25654163 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/games.3825 Text en ©Maurits Graafland, Mary Dankbaar, Agali Mert, Joep Lagro, Laura De Wit-Zuurendonk, Stephanie Schuit, Alma Schaafstal, Marlies Schijven. Originally published in JMIR Serious Games (http://games.jmir.org), 11.11.2014. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Serious Games, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://games.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Viewpoint
Graafland, Maurits
Dankbaar, Mary
Mert, Agali
Lagro, Joep
De Wit-Zuurendonk, Laura
Schuit, Stephanie
Schaafstal, Alma
Schijven, Marlies
How to Systematically Assess Serious Games Applied to Health Care
title How to Systematically Assess Serious Games Applied to Health Care
title_full How to Systematically Assess Serious Games Applied to Health Care
title_fullStr How to Systematically Assess Serious Games Applied to Health Care
title_full_unstemmed How to Systematically Assess Serious Games Applied to Health Care
title_short How to Systematically Assess Serious Games Applied to Health Care
title_sort how to systematically assess serious games applied to health care
topic Viewpoint
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4307812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25654163
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/games.3825
work_keys_str_mv AT graaflandmaurits howtosystematicallyassessseriousgamesappliedtohealthcare
AT dankbaarmary howtosystematicallyassessseriousgamesappliedtohealthcare
AT mertagali howtosystematicallyassessseriousgamesappliedtohealthcare
AT lagrojoep howtosystematicallyassessseriousgamesappliedtohealthcare
AT dewitzuurendonklaura howtosystematicallyassessseriousgamesappliedtohealthcare
AT schuitstephanie howtosystematicallyassessseriousgamesappliedtohealthcare
AT schaafstalalma howtosystematicallyassessseriousgamesappliedtohealthcare
AT schijvenmarlies howtosystematicallyassessseriousgamesappliedtohealthcare