Cargando…
How to Systematically Assess Serious Games Applied to Health Care
The usefulness and effectiveness of specific serious games in the medical domain is often unclear. This is caused by a lack of supporting evidence on validity of individual games, as well as a lack of publicly available information. Moreover, insufficient understanding of design principles among the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications Inc.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4307812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25654163 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/games.3825 |
_version_ | 1782354498375647232 |
---|---|
author | Graafland, Maurits Dankbaar, Mary Mert, Agali Lagro, Joep De Wit-Zuurendonk, Laura Schuit, Stephanie Schaafstal, Alma Schijven, Marlies |
author_facet | Graafland, Maurits Dankbaar, Mary Mert, Agali Lagro, Joep De Wit-Zuurendonk, Laura Schuit, Stephanie Schaafstal, Alma Schijven, Marlies |
author_sort | Graafland, Maurits |
collection | PubMed |
description | The usefulness and effectiveness of specific serious games in the medical domain is often unclear. This is caused by a lack of supporting evidence on validity of individual games, as well as a lack of publicly available information. Moreover, insufficient understanding of design principles among the individuals and institutions that develop or apply a medical serious game compromises their use. This article provides the first consensus-based framework for the assessment of specific medical serious games. The framework provides 62 items in 5 main themes, aimed at assessing a serious game’s rationale, functionality, validity, and data safety. This will allow caregivers and educators to make balanced choices when applying a serious game for healthcare purposes. Furthermore, the framework provides game manufacturers with standards for the development of new, valid serious games. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4307812 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | JMIR Publications Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43078122015-02-03 How to Systematically Assess Serious Games Applied to Health Care Graafland, Maurits Dankbaar, Mary Mert, Agali Lagro, Joep De Wit-Zuurendonk, Laura Schuit, Stephanie Schaafstal, Alma Schijven, Marlies JMIR Serious Games Viewpoint The usefulness and effectiveness of specific serious games in the medical domain is often unclear. This is caused by a lack of supporting evidence on validity of individual games, as well as a lack of publicly available information. Moreover, insufficient understanding of design principles among the individuals and institutions that develop or apply a medical serious game compromises their use. This article provides the first consensus-based framework for the assessment of specific medical serious games. The framework provides 62 items in 5 main themes, aimed at assessing a serious game’s rationale, functionality, validity, and data safety. This will allow caregivers and educators to make balanced choices when applying a serious game for healthcare purposes. Furthermore, the framework provides game manufacturers with standards for the development of new, valid serious games. JMIR Publications Inc. 2014-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4307812/ /pubmed/25654163 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/games.3825 Text en ©Maurits Graafland, Mary Dankbaar, Agali Mert, Joep Lagro, Laura De Wit-Zuurendonk, Stephanie Schuit, Alma Schaafstal, Marlies Schijven. Originally published in JMIR Serious Games (http://games.jmir.org), 11.11.2014. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Serious Games, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://games.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Viewpoint Graafland, Maurits Dankbaar, Mary Mert, Agali Lagro, Joep De Wit-Zuurendonk, Laura Schuit, Stephanie Schaafstal, Alma Schijven, Marlies How to Systematically Assess Serious Games Applied to Health Care |
title | How to Systematically Assess Serious Games Applied to Health Care |
title_full | How to Systematically Assess Serious Games Applied to Health Care |
title_fullStr | How to Systematically Assess Serious Games Applied to Health Care |
title_full_unstemmed | How to Systematically Assess Serious Games Applied to Health Care |
title_short | How to Systematically Assess Serious Games Applied to Health Care |
title_sort | how to systematically assess serious games applied to health care |
topic | Viewpoint |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4307812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25654163 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/games.3825 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT graaflandmaurits howtosystematicallyassessseriousgamesappliedtohealthcare AT dankbaarmary howtosystematicallyassessseriousgamesappliedtohealthcare AT mertagali howtosystematicallyassessseriousgamesappliedtohealthcare AT lagrojoep howtosystematicallyassessseriousgamesappliedtohealthcare AT dewitzuurendonklaura howtosystematicallyassessseriousgamesappliedtohealthcare AT schuitstephanie howtosystematicallyassessseriousgamesappliedtohealthcare AT schaafstalalma howtosystematicallyassessseriousgamesappliedtohealthcare AT schijvenmarlies howtosystematicallyassessseriousgamesappliedtohealthcare |