Cargando…

A survey of population-based utility scores for cervical cancer prevention

BACKGROUND: With human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination introduced in a number of countries, there is considerable interest in evaluating the cost-effectiveness of HPV testing as the primary cervical screening test in these settings. However, the availability of utility scores for these newer interv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simonella, Leonardo, Howard, Kirsten, Canfell, Karen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4307910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25495005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-899
_version_ 1782354516807516160
author Simonella, Leonardo
Howard, Kirsten
Canfell, Karen
author_facet Simonella, Leonardo
Howard, Kirsten
Canfell, Karen
author_sort Simonella, Leonardo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination introduced in a number of countries, there is considerable interest in evaluating the cost-effectiveness of HPV testing as the primary cervical screening test in these settings. However, the availability of utility scores for these newer interventions is limited. Our aim in this paper is to present utility scores for HPV vaccination, HPV testing and cytology based screening states among women targeted for cervical screening. METHODS: We invited a random sample of women targeted for cervical screening (aged 20-69 years) living in Sydney, Australia, to participate in a face-to-face interview. Participants were asked to indicate preferences (rank and utility scores) for 10 hypothetical health states relating to HPV vaccination, cytology and primary HPV screening, cervical precursor disease and early stage cervical cancer. Preferences for hypothetical health states were measured through ranking then a two-stage standard gamble. Each participant’s own health state was measured as a utility score using the EQ5D. Potential differences by age were assessed using the Wilcox Rank Sum test. RESULTS: A maximum of 276 women were contacted, of which 43 (mean age 49 years) agreed to be interviewed (15.6%). The overall health state of women as measured by the EQ5D was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83-0.89). Of the 10 health states, the highest ranked were ‘normal cytology’ and ‘HPV vaccination’ (equal 1(st)). States involving an HPV positive result with a subsequent normal cytology or colposcopy were ranked below those for low grade cytological abnormalities with or without a subsequent colposcopic normal result (ranks 3-4 vs. 4-5). However, mean utility scores were broadly similar for all health states, except cervical cancer. No significant differences in scores were identified between age groups. CONCLUSION: Our survey suggests health states relating to HPV testing are ranked below ‘low grade cytology’ disease abnormalities. However, this difference was minimal on the utility scale, as most values for health states were largely clustered. These results provide a preliminary set of non-clinic population-based utilities that may be used with other values to explore the economic implications of introducing HPV testing as a primary screening tool in the context of HPV vaccination. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1756-0500-7-899) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4307910
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43079102015-01-28 A survey of population-based utility scores for cervical cancer prevention Simonella, Leonardo Howard, Kirsten Canfell, Karen BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: With human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination introduced in a number of countries, there is considerable interest in evaluating the cost-effectiveness of HPV testing as the primary cervical screening test in these settings. However, the availability of utility scores for these newer interventions is limited. Our aim in this paper is to present utility scores for HPV vaccination, HPV testing and cytology based screening states among women targeted for cervical screening. METHODS: We invited a random sample of women targeted for cervical screening (aged 20-69 years) living in Sydney, Australia, to participate in a face-to-face interview. Participants were asked to indicate preferences (rank and utility scores) for 10 hypothetical health states relating to HPV vaccination, cytology and primary HPV screening, cervical precursor disease and early stage cervical cancer. Preferences for hypothetical health states were measured through ranking then a two-stage standard gamble. Each participant’s own health state was measured as a utility score using the EQ5D. Potential differences by age were assessed using the Wilcox Rank Sum test. RESULTS: A maximum of 276 women were contacted, of which 43 (mean age 49 years) agreed to be interviewed (15.6%). The overall health state of women as measured by the EQ5D was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83-0.89). Of the 10 health states, the highest ranked were ‘normal cytology’ and ‘HPV vaccination’ (equal 1(st)). States involving an HPV positive result with a subsequent normal cytology or colposcopy were ranked below those for low grade cytological abnormalities with or without a subsequent colposcopic normal result (ranks 3-4 vs. 4-5). However, mean utility scores were broadly similar for all health states, except cervical cancer. No significant differences in scores were identified between age groups. CONCLUSION: Our survey suggests health states relating to HPV testing are ranked below ‘low grade cytology’ disease abnormalities. However, this difference was minimal on the utility scale, as most values for health states were largely clustered. These results provide a preliminary set of non-clinic population-based utilities that may be used with other values to explore the economic implications of introducing HPV testing as a primary screening tool in the context of HPV vaccination. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1756-0500-7-899) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4307910/ /pubmed/25495005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-899 Text en © Simonella et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Simonella, Leonardo
Howard, Kirsten
Canfell, Karen
A survey of population-based utility scores for cervical cancer prevention
title A survey of population-based utility scores for cervical cancer prevention
title_full A survey of population-based utility scores for cervical cancer prevention
title_fullStr A survey of population-based utility scores for cervical cancer prevention
title_full_unstemmed A survey of population-based utility scores for cervical cancer prevention
title_short A survey of population-based utility scores for cervical cancer prevention
title_sort survey of population-based utility scores for cervical cancer prevention
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4307910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25495005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-899
work_keys_str_mv AT simonellaleonardo asurveyofpopulationbasedutilityscoresforcervicalcancerprevention
AT howardkirsten asurveyofpopulationbasedutilityscoresforcervicalcancerprevention
AT canfellkaren asurveyofpopulationbasedutilityscoresforcervicalcancerprevention
AT simonellaleonardo surveyofpopulationbasedutilityscoresforcervicalcancerprevention
AT howardkirsten surveyofpopulationbasedutilityscoresforcervicalcancerprevention
AT canfellkaren surveyofpopulationbasedutilityscoresforcervicalcancerprevention