Cargando…
The Collective Benefits of Feeling Good and Letting Go: Positive Emotion and (dis)Inhibition Interact to Predict Cooperative Behavior
Cooperation is central to human existence, forming the bedrock of everyday social relationships and larger societal structures. Thus, understanding the psychological underpinnings of cooperation is of both scientific and practical importance. Recent work using a dual-process framework suggests that...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4308081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25625722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117426 |
_version_ | 1782354545650696192 |
---|---|
author | Rand, David G. Kraft-Todd, Gordon Gruber, June |
author_facet | Rand, David G. Kraft-Todd, Gordon Gruber, June |
author_sort | Rand, David G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cooperation is central to human existence, forming the bedrock of everyday social relationships and larger societal structures. Thus, understanding the psychological underpinnings of cooperation is of both scientific and practical importance. Recent work using a dual-process framework suggests that intuitive processing can promote cooperation while deliberative processing can undermine it. Here we add to this line of research by more specifically identifying deliberative and intuitive processes that affect cooperation. To do so, we applied automated text analysis using the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) software to investigate the association between behavior in one-shot anonymous economic cooperation games and the presence inhibition (a deliberative process) and positive emotion (an intuitive process) in free-response narratives written after (Study 1, N = 4,218) or during (Study 2, N = 236) the decision-making process. Consistent with previous results, across both studies inhibition predicted reduced cooperation while positive emotion predicted increased cooperation (even when controlling for negative emotion). Importantly, there was a significant interaction between positive emotion and inhibition, such that the most cooperative individuals had high positive emotion and low inhibition. This suggests that inhibition (i.e., reflective or deliberative processing) may undermine cooperative behavior by suppressing the prosocial effects of positive emotion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4308081 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43080812015-02-06 The Collective Benefits of Feeling Good and Letting Go: Positive Emotion and (dis)Inhibition Interact to Predict Cooperative Behavior Rand, David G. Kraft-Todd, Gordon Gruber, June PLoS One Research Article Cooperation is central to human existence, forming the bedrock of everyday social relationships and larger societal structures. Thus, understanding the psychological underpinnings of cooperation is of both scientific and practical importance. Recent work using a dual-process framework suggests that intuitive processing can promote cooperation while deliberative processing can undermine it. Here we add to this line of research by more specifically identifying deliberative and intuitive processes that affect cooperation. To do so, we applied automated text analysis using the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) software to investigate the association between behavior in one-shot anonymous economic cooperation games and the presence inhibition (a deliberative process) and positive emotion (an intuitive process) in free-response narratives written after (Study 1, N = 4,218) or during (Study 2, N = 236) the decision-making process. Consistent with previous results, across both studies inhibition predicted reduced cooperation while positive emotion predicted increased cooperation (even when controlling for negative emotion). Importantly, there was a significant interaction between positive emotion and inhibition, such that the most cooperative individuals had high positive emotion and low inhibition. This suggests that inhibition (i.e., reflective or deliberative processing) may undermine cooperative behavior by suppressing the prosocial effects of positive emotion. Public Library of Science 2015-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4308081/ /pubmed/25625722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117426 Text en © 2015 Rand et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Rand, David G. Kraft-Todd, Gordon Gruber, June The Collective Benefits of Feeling Good and Letting Go: Positive Emotion and (dis)Inhibition Interact to Predict Cooperative Behavior |
title | The Collective Benefits of Feeling Good and Letting Go: Positive Emotion and (dis)Inhibition Interact to Predict Cooperative Behavior |
title_full | The Collective Benefits of Feeling Good and Letting Go: Positive Emotion and (dis)Inhibition Interact to Predict Cooperative Behavior |
title_fullStr | The Collective Benefits of Feeling Good and Letting Go: Positive Emotion and (dis)Inhibition Interact to Predict Cooperative Behavior |
title_full_unstemmed | The Collective Benefits of Feeling Good and Letting Go: Positive Emotion and (dis)Inhibition Interact to Predict Cooperative Behavior |
title_short | The Collective Benefits of Feeling Good and Letting Go: Positive Emotion and (dis)Inhibition Interact to Predict Cooperative Behavior |
title_sort | collective benefits of feeling good and letting go: positive emotion and (dis)inhibition interact to predict cooperative behavior |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4308081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25625722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117426 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT randdavidg thecollectivebenefitsoffeelinggoodandlettinggopositiveemotionanddisinhibitioninteracttopredictcooperativebehavior AT krafttoddgordon thecollectivebenefitsoffeelinggoodandlettinggopositiveemotionanddisinhibitioninteracttopredictcooperativebehavior AT gruberjune thecollectivebenefitsoffeelinggoodandlettinggopositiveemotionanddisinhibitioninteracttopredictcooperativebehavior AT randdavidg collectivebenefitsoffeelinggoodandlettinggopositiveemotionanddisinhibitioninteracttopredictcooperativebehavior AT krafttoddgordon collectivebenefitsoffeelinggoodandlettinggopositiveemotionanddisinhibitioninteracttopredictcooperativebehavior AT gruberjune collectivebenefitsoffeelinggoodandlettinggopositiveemotionanddisinhibitioninteracttopredictcooperativebehavior |