Cargando…

Authentication of beef versus horse meat using 60 MHz (1)H NMR spectroscopy

This work reports a candidate screening protocol to distinguish beef from horse meat based upon comparison of triglyceride signatures obtained by 60 MHz (1)H NMR spectroscopy. Using a simple chloroform-based extraction, we obtained classic low-field triglyceride spectra from typically a 10 min acqui...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jakes, W., Gerdova, A., Defernez, M., Watson, A.D., McCallum, C., Limer, E., Colquhoun, I.J., Williamson, D.C., Kemsley, E.K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Applied Science Publishers 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4308633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25577043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.11.110
_version_ 1782354558636261376
author Jakes, W.
Gerdova, A.
Defernez, M.
Watson, A.D.
McCallum, C.
Limer, E.
Colquhoun, I.J.
Williamson, D.C.
Kemsley, E.K.
author_facet Jakes, W.
Gerdova, A.
Defernez, M.
Watson, A.D.
McCallum, C.
Limer, E.
Colquhoun, I.J.
Williamson, D.C.
Kemsley, E.K.
author_sort Jakes, W.
collection PubMed
description This work reports a candidate screening protocol to distinguish beef from horse meat based upon comparison of triglyceride signatures obtained by 60 MHz (1)H NMR spectroscopy. Using a simple chloroform-based extraction, we obtained classic low-field triglyceride spectra from typically a 10 min acquisition time. Peak integration was sufficient to differentiate samples of fresh beef (76 extractions) and horse (62 extractions) using Naïve Bayes classification. Principal component analysis gave a two-dimensional “authentic” beef region (p = 0.001) against which further spectra could be compared. This model was challenged using a subset of 23 freeze–thawed training samples. The outcomes indicated that storing samples by freezing does not adversely affect the analysis. Of a further collection of extractions from previously unseen samples, 90/91 beef spectra were classified as authentic, and 16/16 horse spectra as non-authentic. We conclude that 60 MHz (1)H NMR represents a feasible high-throughput approach for screening raw meat.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4308633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier Applied Science Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43086332015-05-15 Authentication of beef versus horse meat using 60 MHz (1)H NMR spectroscopy Jakes, W. Gerdova, A. Defernez, M. Watson, A.D. McCallum, C. Limer, E. Colquhoun, I.J. Williamson, D.C. Kemsley, E.K. Food Chem Rapid Communication This work reports a candidate screening protocol to distinguish beef from horse meat based upon comparison of triglyceride signatures obtained by 60 MHz (1)H NMR spectroscopy. Using a simple chloroform-based extraction, we obtained classic low-field triglyceride spectra from typically a 10 min acquisition time. Peak integration was sufficient to differentiate samples of fresh beef (76 extractions) and horse (62 extractions) using Naïve Bayes classification. Principal component analysis gave a two-dimensional “authentic” beef region (p = 0.001) against which further spectra could be compared. This model was challenged using a subset of 23 freeze–thawed training samples. The outcomes indicated that storing samples by freezing does not adversely affect the analysis. Of a further collection of extractions from previously unseen samples, 90/91 beef spectra were classified as authentic, and 16/16 horse spectra as non-authentic. We conclude that 60 MHz (1)H NMR represents a feasible high-throughput approach for screening raw meat. Elsevier Applied Science Publishers 2015-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4308633/ /pubmed/25577043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.11.110 Text en © 2014 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
spellingShingle Rapid Communication
Jakes, W.
Gerdova, A.
Defernez, M.
Watson, A.D.
McCallum, C.
Limer, E.
Colquhoun, I.J.
Williamson, D.C.
Kemsley, E.K.
Authentication of beef versus horse meat using 60 MHz (1)H NMR spectroscopy
title Authentication of beef versus horse meat using 60 MHz (1)H NMR spectroscopy
title_full Authentication of beef versus horse meat using 60 MHz (1)H NMR spectroscopy
title_fullStr Authentication of beef versus horse meat using 60 MHz (1)H NMR spectroscopy
title_full_unstemmed Authentication of beef versus horse meat using 60 MHz (1)H NMR spectroscopy
title_short Authentication of beef versus horse meat using 60 MHz (1)H NMR spectroscopy
title_sort authentication of beef versus horse meat using 60 mhz (1)h nmr spectroscopy
topic Rapid Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4308633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25577043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.11.110
work_keys_str_mv AT jakesw authenticationofbeefversushorsemeatusing60mhz1hnmrspectroscopy
AT gerdovaa authenticationofbeefversushorsemeatusing60mhz1hnmrspectroscopy
AT defernezm authenticationofbeefversushorsemeatusing60mhz1hnmrspectroscopy
AT watsonad authenticationofbeefversushorsemeatusing60mhz1hnmrspectroscopy
AT mccallumc authenticationofbeefversushorsemeatusing60mhz1hnmrspectroscopy
AT limere authenticationofbeefversushorsemeatusing60mhz1hnmrspectroscopy
AT colquhounij authenticationofbeefversushorsemeatusing60mhz1hnmrspectroscopy
AT williamsondc authenticationofbeefversushorsemeatusing60mhz1hnmrspectroscopy
AT kemsleyek authenticationofbeefversushorsemeatusing60mhz1hnmrspectroscopy