Cargando…
Evaluation of perineal muscle strength in the first trimester of pregnancy
OBJECTIVES: to analyze the Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength (PFMS) of pregnant women with one or more vaginal or cesarean deliveries; to compare the PFMS of these with pregnant women with the PFMS of primiparous women. METHODS: cross-sectional study with women up to 12 weeks pregnant, performed in Itape...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São
Paulo
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4309222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25591083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-1169.3600.2492 |
_version_ | 1782354658667266048 |
---|---|
author | Caroci, Adriana de Souza Riesco, Maria Luiza Gonzalez Rocha, Bianca Moraes Camargo Ventura, Letícia de Jesus Oliveira, Sheyla Guimarães |
author_facet | Caroci, Adriana de Souza Riesco, Maria Luiza Gonzalez Rocha, Bianca Moraes Camargo Ventura, Letícia de Jesus Oliveira, Sheyla Guimarães |
author_sort | Caroci, Adriana de Souza |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: to analyze the Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength (PFMS) of pregnant women with one or more vaginal or cesarean deliveries; to compare the PFMS of these with pregnant women with the PFMS of primiparous women. METHODS: cross-sectional study with women up to 12 weeks pregnant, performed in Itapecerica da Serra, São Paulo state, from December 2012 to May 2013. The sample consisted of 110 pregnant women with one or more vaginal deliveries or cesarean sections and 110 primigravidae. The PFMS was evaluated by perineometry (Peritron(tm)) and vaginal digital palpation (modified Oxford scale). RESULTS: the average PFMS in pregnant women with a history of vaginal delivery or cesarean section was 33.4 (SD=21.2) cmH2O. From the Oxford scale, 75.4% of the pregnant women with previous vaginal or cesarean deliveries presented grade ≤ 2, and 5.5% grade ≥ 4; among the primiparae, 39.9% presented grade ≤ 2, and 50.9% grade ≥ 4, with a statistically significant difference (p<0.001). From the perineometry, there was no statistically significant difference between the PFMS and age, type of delivery, parity, body mass index, and genitourinary tract symptoms, however, there was a statistically significant difference between the pregnant women with and without a history of episiotomy (p=0.04). In the palpation, none of the variables showed a statistically significant difference. CONCLUSION: pregnancy and childbirth can reduce the PFMS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4309222 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São
Paulo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43092222015-01-30 Evaluation of perineal muscle strength in the first trimester of pregnancy Caroci, Adriana de Souza Riesco, Maria Luiza Gonzalez Rocha, Bianca Moraes Camargo Ventura, Letícia de Jesus Oliveira, Sheyla Guimarães Rev Lat Am Enfermagem Original Articles OBJECTIVES: to analyze the Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength (PFMS) of pregnant women with one or more vaginal or cesarean deliveries; to compare the PFMS of these with pregnant women with the PFMS of primiparous women. METHODS: cross-sectional study with women up to 12 weeks pregnant, performed in Itapecerica da Serra, São Paulo state, from December 2012 to May 2013. The sample consisted of 110 pregnant women with one or more vaginal deliveries or cesarean sections and 110 primigravidae. The PFMS was evaluated by perineometry (Peritron(tm)) and vaginal digital palpation (modified Oxford scale). RESULTS: the average PFMS in pregnant women with a history of vaginal delivery or cesarean section was 33.4 (SD=21.2) cmH2O. From the Oxford scale, 75.4% of the pregnant women with previous vaginal or cesarean deliveries presented grade ≤ 2, and 5.5% grade ≥ 4; among the primiparae, 39.9% presented grade ≤ 2, and 50.9% grade ≥ 4, with a statistically significant difference (p<0.001). From the perineometry, there was no statistically significant difference between the PFMS and age, type of delivery, parity, body mass index, and genitourinary tract symptoms, however, there was a statistically significant difference between the pregnant women with and without a history of episiotomy (p=0.04). In the palpation, none of the variables showed a statistically significant difference. CONCLUSION: pregnancy and childbirth can reduce the PFMS. Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4309222/ /pubmed/25591083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-1169.3600.2492 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Caroci, Adriana de Souza Riesco, Maria Luiza Gonzalez Rocha, Bianca Moraes Camargo Ventura, Letícia de Jesus Oliveira, Sheyla Guimarães Evaluation of perineal muscle strength in the first trimester of pregnancy |
title | Evaluation of perineal muscle strength in the first trimester of
pregnancy
|
title_full | Evaluation of perineal muscle strength in the first trimester of
pregnancy
|
title_fullStr | Evaluation of perineal muscle strength in the first trimester of
pregnancy
|
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of perineal muscle strength in the first trimester of
pregnancy
|
title_short | Evaluation of perineal muscle strength in the first trimester of
pregnancy
|
title_sort | evaluation of perineal muscle strength in the first trimester of
pregnancy |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4309222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25591083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-1169.3600.2492 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carociadrianadesouza evaluationofperinealmusclestrengthinthefirsttrimesterofpregnancy AT riescomarialuizagonzalez evaluationofperinealmusclestrengthinthefirsttrimesterofpregnancy AT rochabiancamoraescamargo evaluationofperinealmusclestrengthinthefirsttrimesterofpregnancy AT venturaleticiadejesus evaluationofperinealmusclestrengthinthefirsttrimesterofpregnancy AT oliveirasheylaguimaraes evaluationofperinealmusclestrengthinthefirsttrimesterofpregnancy |