Cargando…

Evaluation of perineal muscle strength in the first trimester of pregnancy

OBJECTIVES: to analyze the Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength (PFMS) of pregnant women with one or more vaginal or cesarean deliveries; to compare the PFMS of these with pregnant women with the PFMS of primiparous women. METHODS: cross-sectional study with women up to 12 weeks pregnant, performed in Itape...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Caroci, Adriana de Souza, Riesco, Maria Luiza Gonzalez, Rocha, Bianca Moraes Camargo, Ventura, Letícia de Jesus, Oliveira, Sheyla Guimarães
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4309222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25591083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-1169.3600.2492
_version_ 1782354658667266048
author Caroci, Adriana de Souza
Riesco, Maria Luiza Gonzalez
Rocha, Bianca Moraes Camargo
Ventura, Letícia de Jesus
Oliveira, Sheyla Guimarães
author_facet Caroci, Adriana de Souza
Riesco, Maria Luiza Gonzalez
Rocha, Bianca Moraes Camargo
Ventura, Letícia de Jesus
Oliveira, Sheyla Guimarães
author_sort Caroci, Adriana de Souza
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: to analyze the Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength (PFMS) of pregnant women with one or more vaginal or cesarean deliveries; to compare the PFMS of these with pregnant women with the PFMS of primiparous women. METHODS: cross-sectional study with women up to 12 weeks pregnant, performed in Itapecerica da Serra, São Paulo state, from December 2012 to May 2013. The sample consisted of 110 pregnant women with one or more vaginal deliveries or cesarean sections and 110 primigravidae. The PFMS was evaluated by perineometry (Peritron(tm)) and vaginal digital palpation (modified Oxford scale). RESULTS: the average PFMS in pregnant women with a history of vaginal delivery or cesarean section was 33.4 (SD=21.2) cmH2O. From the Oxford scale, 75.4% of the pregnant women with previous vaginal or cesarean deliveries presented grade ≤ 2, and 5.5% grade ≥ 4; among the primiparae, 39.9% presented grade ≤ 2, and 50.9% grade ≥ 4, with a statistically significant difference (p<0.001). From the perineometry, there was no statistically significant difference between the PFMS and age, type of delivery, parity, body mass index, and genitourinary tract symptoms, however, there was a statistically significant difference between the pregnant women with and without a history of episiotomy (p=0.04). In the palpation, none of the variables showed a statistically significant difference. CONCLUSION: pregnancy and childbirth can reduce the PFMS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4309222
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43092222015-01-30 Evaluation of perineal muscle strength in the first trimester of pregnancy Caroci, Adriana de Souza Riesco, Maria Luiza Gonzalez Rocha, Bianca Moraes Camargo Ventura, Letícia de Jesus Oliveira, Sheyla Guimarães Rev Lat Am Enfermagem Original Articles OBJECTIVES: to analyze the Pelvic Floor Muscle Strength (PFMS) of pregnant women with one or more vaginal or cesarean deliveries; to compare the PFMS of these with pregnant women with the PFMS of primiparous women. METHODS: cross-sectional study with women up to 12 weeks pregnant, performed in Itapecerica da Serra, São Paulo state, from December 2012 to May 2013. The sample consisted of 110 pregnant women with one or more vaginal deliveries or cesarean sections and 110 primigravidae. The PFMS was evaluated by perineometry (Peritron(tm)) and vaginal digital palpation (modified Oxford scale). RESULTS: the average PFMS in pregnant women with a history of vaginal delivery or cesarean section was 33.4 (SD=21.2) cmH2O. From the Oxford scale, 75.4% of the pregnant women with previous vaginal or cesarean deliveries presented grade ≤ 2, and 5.5% grade ≥ 4; among the primiparae, 39.9% presented grade ≤ 2, and 50.9% grade ≥ 4, with a statistically significant difference (p<0.001). From the perineometry, there was no statistically significant difference between the PFMS and age, type of delivery, parity, body mass index, and genitourinary tract symptoms, however, there was a statistically significant difference between the pregnant women with and without a history of episiotomy (p=0.04). In the palpation, none of the variables showed a statistically significant difference. CONCLUSION: pregnancy and childbirth can reduce the PFMS. Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4309222/ /pubmed/25591083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-1169.3600.2492 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Caroci, Adriana de Souza
Riesco, Maria Luiza Gonzalez
Rocha, Bianca Moraes Camargo
Ventura, Letícia de Jesus
Oliveira, Sheyla Guimarães
Evaluation of perineal muscle strength in the first trimester of pregnancy
title Evaluation of perineal muscle strength in the first trimester of pregnancy
title_full Evaluation of perineal muscle strength in the first trimester of pregnancy
title_fullStr Evaluation of perineal muscle strength in the first trimester of pregnancy
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of perineal muscle strength in the first trimester of pregnancy
title_short Evaluation of perineal muscle strength in the first trimester of pregnancy
title_sort evaluation of perineal muscle strength in the first trimester of pregnancy
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4309222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25591083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-1169.3600.2492
work_keys_str_mv AT carociadrianadesouza evaluationofperinealmusclestrengthinthefirsttrimesterofpregnancy
AT riescomarialuizagonzalez evaluationofperinealmusclestrengthinthefirsttrimesterofpregnancy
AT rochabiancamoraescamargo evaluationofperinealmusclestrengthinthefirsttrimesterofpregnancy
AT venturaleticiadejesus evaluationofperinealmusclestrengthinthefirsttrimesterofpregnancy
AT oliveirasheylaguimaraes evaluationofperinealmusclestrengthinthefirsttrimesterofpregnancy