Cargando…

Evaluation of the Outcome of Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy by a Single Surgeon: Experience with an Initial 30 Cases

Objective: We carried out this study to clarify whether operative methods of laparoscopic prostatectomy (LRP) could become a standard therapy. The purpose was to evaluate the technical feasibility, oncologic effectiveness and perioperative and postoperative morbidity of LRP performed by a general ur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akita, Hidetoshi, Okamura, Takehiko, Naiki, Taku, Nagata, Daisuke, Tozawa, Keiichi, Kohri, Kenjiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Association of Rural Medicine 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4309315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25649423
http://dx.doi.org/10.2185/jrm.5.134
_version_ 1782354673208918016
author Akita, Hidetoshi
Okamura, Takehiko
Naiki, Taku
Nagata, Daisuke
Tozawa, Keiichi
Kohri, Kenjiro
author_facet Akita, Hidetoshi
Okamura, Takehiko
Naiki, Taku
Nagata, Daisuke
Tozawa, Keiichi
Kohri, Kenjiro
author_sort Akita, Hidetoshi
collection PubMed
description Objective: We carried out this study to clarify whether operative methods of laparoscopic prostatectomy (LRP) could become a standard therapy. The purpose was to evaluate the technical feasibility, oncologic effectiveness and perioperative and postoperative morbidity of LRP performed by a general urologist. Patients and Methods: Between June 2004 and May 2006, 30 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer consecutively underwent LRP by a single surgeon. Oncologic data were assessed by histopathological examination and by postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. Results: Complete laparoscopic removal of the prostate and seminal vesicles was achieved in all 30 patients. The average operation time was 250.9 min (range, 168 to 394 min). The total positive surgical margin rate was 20.7% (6 of 29 cases), with a total PSA recurrence rate was 23.3% (7 of 30 cases), but the frequencies tended to be decreased in the later phase cases. Perioperative complications were encountered in 5 patients; four of these patients were in the initial 10 cases. Two of the 30 cases (6.7%) required a blood transfusion (first case and 11th case). There were three surgical complications, one ureter injury, one rectal injury and one sigmoid serosal injury. The catheter duration intervals were reduced in the later cases. Conclusions:From our experience with one surgeon, with whom perioperative complications were concentrated in the initial 10 cases, we conclude that LRP should be performed by experienced surgeons after intensive training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4309315
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher The Japanese Association of Rural Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43093152015-02-03 Evaluation of the Outcome of Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy by a Single Surgeon: Experience with an Initial 30 Cases Akita, Hidetoshi Okamura, Takehiko Naiki, Taku Nagata, Daisuke Tozawa, Keiichi Kohri, Kenjiro J Rural Med Original Article Objective: We carried out this study to clarify whether operative methods of laparoscopic prostatectomy (LRP) could become a standard therapy. The purpose was to evaluate the technical feasibility, oncologic effectiveness and perioperative and postoperative morbidity of LRP performed by a general urologist. Patients and Methods: Between June 2004 and May 2006, 30 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer consecutively underwent LRP by a single surgeon. Oncologic data were assessed by histopathological examination and by postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. Results: Complete laparoscopic removal of the prostate and seminal vesicles was achieved in all 30 patients. The average operation time was 250.9 min (range, 168 to 394 min). The total positive surgical margin rate was 20.7% (6 of 29 cases), with a total PSA recurrence rate was 23.3% (7 of 30 cases), but the frequencies tended to be decreased in the later phase cases. Perioperative complications were encountered in 5 patients; four of these patients were in the initial 10 cases. Two of the 30 cases (6.7%) required a blood transfusion (first case and 11th case). There were three surgical complications, one ureter injury, one rectal injury and one sigmoid serosal injury. The catheter duration intervals were reduced in the later cases. Conclusions:From our experience with one surgeon, with whom perioperative complications were concentrated in the initial 10 cases, we conclude that LRP should be performed by experienced surgeons after intensive training. The Japanese Association of Rural Medicine 2010-07-09 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC4309315/ /pubmed/25649423 http://dx.doi.org/10.2185/jrm.5.134 Text en ©2010 The Japanese Association of Rural Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License.
spellingShingle Original Article
Akita, Hidetoshi
Okamura, Takehiko
Naiki, Taku
Nagata, Daisuke
Tozawa, Keiichi
Kohri, Kenjiro
Evaluation of the Outcome of Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy by a Single Surgeon: Experience with an Initial 30 Cases
title Evaluation of the Outcome of Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy by a Single Surgeon: Experience with an Initial 30 Cases
title_full Evaluation of the Outcome of Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy by a Single Surgeon: Experience with an Initial 30 Cases
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Outcome of Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy by a Single Surgeon: Experience with an Initial 30 Cases
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Outcome of Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy by a Single Surgeon: Experience with an Initial 30 Cases
title_short Evaluation of the Outcome of Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy by a Single Surgeon: Experience with an Initial 30 Cases
title_sort evaluation of the outcome of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by a single surgeon: experience with an initial 30 cases
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4309315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25649423
http://dx.doi.org/10.2185/jrm.5.134
work_keys_str_mv AT akitahidetoshi evaluationoftheoutcomeoflaparoscopicradicalprostatectomybyasinglesurgeonexperiencewithaninitial30cases
AT okamuratakehiko evaluationoftheoutcomeoflaparoscopicradicalprostatectomybyasinglesurgeonexperiencewithaninitial30cases
AT naikitaku evaluationoftheoutcomeoflaparoscopicradicalprostatectomybyasinglesurgeonexperiencewithaninitial30cases
AT nagatadaisuke evaluationoftheoutcomeoflaparoscopicradicalprostatectomybyasinglesurgeonexperiencewithaninitial30cases
AT tozawakeiichi evaluationoftheoutcomeoflaparoscopicradicalprostatectomybyasinglesurgeonexperiencewithaninitial30cases
AT kohrikenjiro evaluationoftheoutcomeoflaparoscopicradicalprostatectomybyasinglesurgeonexperiencewithaninitial30cases