Cargando…

The Evolution of Different Forms of Sociality: Behavioral Mechanisms and Eco-Evolutionary Feedback

Different forms of sociality have evolved via unique evolutionary trajectories. However, it remains unknown to what extent trajectories of social evolution depend on the specific characteristics of different species. Our approach to studying such trajectories is to use evolutionary case-studies, so...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Post, Daniel J., Verbrugge, Rineke, Hemelrijk, Charlotte K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4309640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25629313
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117027
_version_ 1782354732747063296
author van der Post, Daniel J.
Verbrugge, Rineke
Hemelrijk, Charlotte K.
author_facet van der Post, Daniel J.
Verbrugge, Rineke
Hemelrijk, Charlotte K.
author_sort van der Post, Daniel J.
collection PubMed
description Different forms of sociality have evolved via unique evolutionary trajectories. However, it remains unknown to what extent trajectories of social evolution depend on the specific characteristics of different species. Our approach to studying such trajectories is to use evolutionary case-studies, so that we can investigate how grouping co-evolves with a multitude of individual characteristics. Here we focus on anti-predator vigilance and foraging. We use an individual-based model, where behavioral mechanisms are specified, and costs and benefits are not predefined. We show that evolutionary changes in grouping alter selection pressures on vigilance, and vice versa. This eco-evolutionary feedback generates an evolutionary progression from “leader-follower” societies to “fission-fusion” societies, where cooperative vigilance in groups is maintained via a balance between within- and between-group selection. Group-level selection is generated from an assortment that arises spontaneously when vigilant and non-vigilant foragers have different grouping tendencies. The evolutionary maintenance of small groups, and cooperative vigilance in those groups, is therefore achieved simultaneously. The evolutionary phases, and the transitions between them, depend strongly on behavioral mechanisms. Thus, integrating behavioral mechanisms and eco-evolutionary feedback is critical for understanding what kinds of intermediate stages are involved during the evolution of particular forms of sociality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4309640
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43096402015-02-06 The Evolution of Different Forms of Sociality: Behavioral Mechanisms and Eco-Evolutionary Feedback van der Post, Daniel J. Verbrugge, Rineke Hemelrijk, Charlotte K. PLoS One Research Article Different forms of sociality have evolved via unique evolutionary trajectories. However, it remains unknown to what extent trajectories of social evolution depend on the specific characteristics of different species. Our approach to studying such trajectories is to use evolutionary case-studies, so that we can investigate how grouping co-evolves with a multitude of individual characteristics. Here we focus on anti-predator vigilance and foraging. We use an individual-based model, where behavioral mechanisms are specified, and costs and benefits are not predefined. We show that evolutionary changes in grouping alter selection pressures on vigilance, and vice versa. This eco-evolutionary feedback generates an evolutionary progression from “leader-follower” societies to “fission-fusion” societies, where cooperative vigilance in groups is maintained via a balance between within- and between-group selection. Group-level selection is generated from an assortment that arises spontaneously when vigilant and non-vigilant foragers have different grouping tendencies. The evolutionary maintenance of small groups, and cooperative vigilance in those groups, is therefore achieved simultaneously. The evolutionary phases, and the transitions between them, depend strongly on behavioral mechanisms. Thus, integrating behavioral mechanisms and eco-evolutionary feedback is critical for understanding what kinds of intermediate stages are involved during the evolution of particular forms of sociality. Public Library of Science 2015-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4309640/ /pubmed/25629313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117027 Text en © 2015 van der Post et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
van der Post, Daniel J.
Verbrugge, Rineke
Hemelrijk, Charlotte K.
The Evolution of Different Forms of Sociality: Behavioral Mechanisms and Eco-Evolutionary Feedback
title The Evolution of Different Forms of Sociality: Behavioral Mechanisms and Eco-Evolutionary Feedback
title_full The Evolution of Different Forms of Sociality: Behavioral Mechanisms and Eco-Evolutionary Feedback
title_fullStr The Evolution of Different Forms of Sociality: Behavioral Mechanisms and Eco-Evolutionary Feedback
title_full_unstemmed The Evolution of Different Forms of Sociality: Behavioral Mechanisms and Eco-Evolutionary Feedback
title_short The Evolution of Different Forms of Sociality: Behavioral Mechanisms and Eco-Evolutionary Feedback
title_sort evolution of different forms of sociality: behavioral mechanisms and eco-evolutionary feedback
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4309640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25629313
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117027
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderpostdanielj theevolutionofdifferentformsofsocialitybehavioralmechanismsandecoevolutionaryfeedback
AT verbruggerineke theevolutionofdifferentformsofsocialitybehavioralmechanismsandecoevolutionaryfeedback
AT hemelrijkcharlottek theevolutionofdifferentformsofsocialitybehavioralmechanismsandecoevolutionaryfeedback
AT vanderpostdanielj evolutionofdifferentformsofsocialitybehavioralmechanismsandecoevolutionaryfeedback
AT verbruggerineke evolutionofdifferentformsofsocialitybehavioralmechanismsandecoevolutionaryfeedback
AT hemelrijkcharlottek evolutionofdifferentformsofsocialitybehavioralmechanismsandecoevolutionaryfeedback