Cargando…

Barriers to and facilitators of interventions to counter publication bias: thematic analysis of scholarly articles and stakeholder interviews

BACKGROUND: When the nature and direction of research results affect their chances of publication, a distortion of the evidence base – termed publication bias – results. Despite considerable recent efforts to implement measures to reduce the non-publication of trials, publication bias is still a maj...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kien, Christina, Nußbaumer, Barbara, Thaler, Kylie J, Griebler, Ursula, Van Noord, Megan G, Wagner, Petra, Gartlehner, Gerald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4310031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25719959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0551-z
_version_ 1782354791967490048
author Kien, Christina
Nußbaumer, Barbara
Thaler, Kylie J
Griebler, Ursula
Van Noord, Megan G
Wagner, Petra
Gartlehner, Gerald
author_facet Kien, Christina
Nußbaumer, Barbara
Thaler, Kylie J
Griebler, Ursula
Van Noord, Megan G
Wagner, Petra
Gartlehner, Gerald
author_sort Kien, Christina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: When the nature and direction of research results affect their chances of publication, a distortion of the evidence base – termed publication bias – results. Despite considerable recent efforts to implement measures to reduce the non-publication of trials, publication bias is still a major problem in medical research. The objective of our study was to identify barriers to and facilitators of interventions to prevent or reduce publication bias. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the scholarly literature and extracted data from articles. Further, we performed semi-structured interviews with stakeholders. We performed an inductive thematic analysis to identify barriers to and facilitators of interventions to counter publication bias. RESULTS: The systematic review identified 39 articles. Thirty-four of 89 invited interview partners agreed to be interviewed. We clustered interventions into four categories: prospective trial registration, incentives for reporting in peer-reviewed journals or research reports, public availability of individual patient-level data, and peer-review/editorial processes. Barriers we identified included economic and personal interests, lack of financial resources for a global comprehensive trial registry, and different legal systems. Facilitators identified included: raising awareness of the effects of publication bias, providing incentives to make data publically available, and implementing laws to enforce prospective registration and reporting of clinical trial results. CONCLUSIONS: Publication bias is a complex problem that reflects the complex system in which it occurs. The cooperation amongst stakeholders to increase public awareness of the problem, better tailoring of incentives to publish, and ultimately legislative regulations have the greatest potential for reducing publication bias. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-014-0551-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4310031
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43100312015-01-30 Barriers to and facilitators of interventions to counter publication bias: thematic analysis of scholarly articles and stakeholder interviews Kien, Christina Nußbaumer, Barbara Thaler, Kylie J Griebler, Ursula Van Noord, Megan G Wagner, Petra Gartlehner, Gerald BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: When the nature and direction of research results affect their chances of publication, a distortion of the evidence base – termed publication bias – results. Despite considerable recent efforts to implement measures to reduce the non-publication of trials, publication bias is still a major problem in medical research. The objective of our study was to identify barriers to and facilitators of interventions to prevent or reduce publication bias. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the scholarly literature and extracted data from articles. Further, we performed semi-structured interviews with stakeholders. We performed an inductive thematic analysis to identify barriers to and facilitators of interventions to counter publication bias. RESULTS: The systematic review identified 39 articles. Thirty-four of 89 invited interview partners agreed to be interviewed. We clustered interventions into four categories: prospective trial registration, incentives for reporting in peer-reviewed journals or research reports, public availability of individual patient-level data, and peer-review/editorial processes. Barriers we identified included economic and personal interests, lack of financial resources for a global comprehensive trial registry, and different legal systems. Facilitators identified included: raising awareness of the effects of publication bias, providing incentives to make data publically available, and implementing laws to enforce prospective registration and reporting of clinical trial results. CONCLUSIONS: Publication bias is a complex problem that reflects the complex system in which it occurs. The cooperation amongst stakeholders to increase public awareness of the problem, better tailoring of incentives to publish, and ultimately legislative regulations have the greatest potential for reducing publication bias. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-014-0551-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4310031/ /pubmed/25719959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0551-z Text en © Kien et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kien, Christina
Nußbaumer, Barbara
Thaler, Kylie J
Griebler, Ursula
Van Noord, Megan G
Wagner, Petra
Gartlehner, Gerald
Barriers to and facilitators of interventions to counter publication bias: thematic analysis of scholarly articles and stakeholder interviews
title Barriers to and facilitators of interventions to counter publication bias: thematic analysis of scholarly articles and stakeholder interviews
title_full Barriers to and facilitators of interventions to counter publication bias: thematic analysis of scholarly articles and stakeholder interviews
title_fullStr Barriers to and facilitators of interventions to counter publication bias: thematic analysis of scholarly articles and stakeholder interviews
title_full_unstemmed Barriers to and facilitators of interventions to counter publication bias: thematic analysis of scholarly articles and stakeholder interviews
title_short Barriers to and facilitators of interventions to counter publication bias: thematic analysis of scholarly articles and stakeholder interviews
title_sort barriers to and facilitators of interventions to counter publication bias: thematic analysis of scholarly articles and stakeholder interviews
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4310031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25719959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0551-z
work_keys_str_mv AT kienchristina barrierstoandfacilitatorsofinterventionstocounterpublicationbiasthematicanalysisofscholarlyarticlesandstakeholderinterviews
AT nußbaumerbarbara barrierstoandfacilitatorsofinterventionstocounterpublicationbiasthematicanalysisofscholarlyarticlesandstakeholderinterviews
AT thalerkyliej barrierstoandfacilitatorsofinterventionstocounterpublicationbiasthematicanalysisofscholarlyarticlesandstakeholderinterviews
AT grieblerursula barrierstoandfacilitatorsofinterventionstocounterpublicationbiasthematicanalysisofscholarlyarticlesandstakeholderinterviews
AT vannoordmegang barrierstoandfacilitatorsofinterventionstocounterpublicationbiasthematicanalysisofscholarlyarticlesandstakeholderinterviews
AT wagnerpetra barrierstoandfacilitatorsofinterventionstocounterpublicationbiasthematicanalysisofscholarlyarticlesandstakeholderinterviews
AT gartlehnergerald barrierstoandfacilitatorsofinterventionstocounterpublicationbiasthematicanalysisofscholarlyarticlesandstakeholderinterviews
AT barrierstoandfacilitatorsofinterventionstocounterpublicationbiasthematicanalysisofscholarlyarticlesandstakeholderinterviews