Cargando…

A comparison of the efficacy of naftopidil and tamsulosin hydrochloride in medical treatment of benign prostatic enlargement

INTRODUCTION: Lower urinary tract symptoms in men, over age of 50 years is suggestive of benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). Different alpha-blockers have been evaluated for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia for over last 30 years. This study was conducted in a tertiary care institution...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perumal, Chenthil, Chowdhury, Puskar Shyam, Ananthakrishnan, N., Nayak, Prasant, Gurumurthy, Srinivasan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4310123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25657550
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.148624
_version_ 1782354811005435904
author Perumal, Chenthil
Chowdhury, Puskar Shyam
Ananthakrishnan, N.
Nayak, Prasant
Gurumurthy, Srinivasan
author_facet Perumal, Chenthil
Chowdhury, Puskar Shyam
Ananthakrishnan, N.
Nayak, Prasant
Gurumurthy, Srinivasan
author_sort Perumal, Chenthil
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Lower urinary tract symptoms in men, over age of 50 years is suggestive of benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). Different alpha-blockers have been evaluated for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia for over last 30 years. This study was conducted in a tertiary care institution during the period of year between June 2011 and August 2013 to compare the effect of naftopidil and tamsulosin in reducing the obstructive and irritable symptoms of BPE. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A prospective randomized comparative study was carried on 60 patients of BPE by assigning half of them to treatment with tamsulosin and rest with naftopidil. Pre- and post-treatment uroflowmetry (UFM), post-void residue (PVR), International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS), were obtained at 15 and 30 days after starting treatment. RESULTS: The age of patients ranged from 51 to 78. At base line there was no statistical difference between UFM parameter, PVR and IPSS in the two groups. UFM and PVR showed significantly better response at both intervals with naftopidil. Comparison of IPSS showed better improvement in Group A both at 15 and 30 days. It was seen that the obstructive symptoms showed a significantly better response with tamsulosin and symptoms of irritability was seen better response with naftopidil. CONCLUSION: It was seen that during the period of follow-up of 30 days naftopidil had a better effect on UFM, PVR, IPSS compared with tamsulosin. In general, obstructive symptoms showed better improvement in tamsulosin and irritative symptoms showed better improvement in naftopidil.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4310123
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43101232015-02-05 A comparison of the efficacy of naftopidil and tamsulosin hydrochloride in medical treatment of benign prostatic enlargement Perumal, Chenthil Chowdhury, Puskar Shyam Ananthakrishnan, N. Nayak, Prasant Gurumurthy, Srinivasan Urol Ann Original Article INTRODUCTION: Lower urinary tract symptoms in men, over age of 50 years is suggestive of benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). Different alpha-blockers have been evaluated for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia for over last 30 years. This study was conducted in a tertiary care institution during the period of year between June 2011 and August 2013 to compare the effect of naftopidil and tamsulosin in reducing the obstructive and irritable symptoms of BPE. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A prospective randomized comparative study was carried on 60 patients of BPE by assigning half of them to treatment with tamsulosin and rest with naftopidil. Pre- and post-treatment uroflowmetry (UFM), post-void residue (PVR), International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS), were obtained at 15 and 30 days after starting treatment. RESULTS: The age of patients ranged from 51 to 78. At base line there was no statistical difference between UFM parameter, PVR and IPSS in the two groups. UFM and PVR showed significantly better response at both intervals with naftopidil. Comparison of IPSS showed better improvement in Group A both at 15 and 30 days. It was seen that the obstructive symptoms showed a significantly better response with tamsulosin and symptoms of irritability was seen better response with naftopidil. CONCLUSION: It was seen that during the period of follow-up of 30 days naftopidil had a better effect on UFM, PVR, IPSS compared with tamsulosin. In general, obstructive symptoms showed better improvement in tamsulosin and irritative symptoms showed better improvement in naftopidil. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4310123/ /pubmed/25657550 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.148624 Text en Copyright: © Urology Annals http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Perumal, Chenthil
Chowdhury, Puskar Shyam
Ananthakrishnan, N.
Nayak, Prasant
Gurumurthy, Srinivasan
A comparison of the efficacy of naftopidil and tamsulosin hydrochloride in medical treatment of benign prostatic enlargement
title A comparison of the efficacy of naftopidil and tamsulosin hydrochloride in medical treatment of benign prostatic enlargement
title_full A comparison of the efficacy of naftopidil and tamsulosin hydrochloride in medical treatment of benign prostatic enlargement
title_fullStr A comparison of the efficacy of naftopidil and tamsulosin hydrochloride in medical treatment of benign prostatic enlargement
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of the efficacy of naftopidil and tamsulosin hydrochloride in medical treatment of benign prostatic enlargement
title_short A comparison of the efficacy of naftopidil and tamsulosin hydrochloride in medical treatment of benign prostatic enlargement
title_sort comparison of the efficacy of naftopidil and tamsulosin hydrochloride in medical treatment of benign prostatic enlargement
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4310123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25657550
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.148624
work_keys_str_mv AT perumalchenthil acomparisonoftheefficacyofnaftopidilandtamsulosinhydrochlorideinmedicaltreatmentofbenignprostaticenlargement
AT chowdhurypuskarshyam acomparisonoftheefficacyofnaftopidilandtamsulosinhydrochlorideinmedicaltreatmentofbenignprostaticenlargement
AT ananthakrishnann acomparisonoftheefficacyofnaftopidilandtamsulosinhydrochlorideinmedicaltreatmentofbenignprostaticenlargement
AT nayakprasant acomparisonoftheefficacyofnaftopidilandtamsulosinhydrochlorideinmedicaltreatmentofbenignprostaticenlargement
AT gurumurthysrinivasan acomparisonoftheefficacyofnaftopidilandtamsulosinhydrochlorideinmedicaltreatmentofbenignprostaticenlargement
AT perumalchenthil comparisonoftheefficacyofnaftopidilandtamsulosinhydrochlorideinmedicaltreatmentofbenignprostaticenlargement
AT chowdhurypuskarshyam comparisonoftheefficacyofnaftopidilandtamsulosinhydrochlorideinmedicaltreatmentofbenignprostaticenlargement
AT ananthakrishnann comparisonoftheefficacyofnaftopidilandtamsulosinhydrochlorideinmedicaltreatmentofbenignprostaticenlargement
AT nayakprasant comparisonoftheefficacyofnaftopidilandtamsulosinhydrochlorideinmedicaltreatmentofbenignprostaticenlargement
AT gurumurthysrinivasan comparisonoftheefficacyofnaftopidilandtamsulosinhydrochlorideinmedicaltreatmentofbenignprostaticenlargement