Cargando…

Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Children Undergoing Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Single‐Center Double‐Blinded Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND: Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) harnesses an innate defensive mechanism that protects against inflammatory activation and ischemia‐reperfusion injury, known sequelae of cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. We sought to determine the impact of RIPC on clinical outcomes and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCrindle, Brian W., Clarizia, Nadia A., Khaikin, Svetlana, Holtby, Helen M., Manlhiot, Cedric, Schwartz, Steven M., Caldarone, Christopher A., Coles, John G., Van Arsdell, Glen S., Scherer, Stephen W., Redington, Andrew N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4310383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25074698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.114.000964
_version_ 1782354863254929408
author McCrindle, Brian W.
Clarizia, Nadia A.
Khaikin, Svetlana
Holtby, Helen M.
Manlhiot, Cedric
Schwartz, Steven M.
Caldarone, Christopher A.
Coles, John G.
Van Arsdell, Glen S.
Scherer, Stephen W.
Redington, Andrew N.
author_facet McCrindle, Brian W.
Clarizia, Nadia A.
Khaikin, Svetlana
Holtby, Helen M.
Manlhiot, Cedric
Schwartz, Steven M.
Caldarone, Christopher A.
Coles, John G.
Van Arsdell, Glen S.
Scherer, Stephen W.
Redington, Andrew N.
author_sort McCrindle, Brian W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) harnesses an innate defensive mechanism that protects against inflammatory activation and ischemia‐reperfusion injury, known sequelae of cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. We sought to determine the impact of RIPC on clinical outcomes and physiological markers related to ischemia‐reperfusion injury and inflammatory activation after cardiac surgery in children. METHODS AND RESULTS: Overall, 299 children (aged neonate to 17 years) were randomized to receive an RIPC stimulus (inflation of a blood pressure cuff on the left thigh to 15 mm Hg above systolic for four 5‐minute intervals) versus a blinded sham stimulus during induction with a standardized anesthesia protocol. Primary outcome was duration of postoperative hospital stay, with serial clinical and laboratory measurements for the first 48 postoperative hours and clinical follow‐up to discharge. There were no significant baseline differences between RIPC (n=148) and sham (n=151). There were no in‐hospital deaths. No significant difference in length of postoperative hospital stay was noted (sham 5.4 versus RIPC 5.6 days; difference +0.2; adjusted P=0.91), with the 95% confidence interval (−0.7 to +0.9) excluding a prespecified minimal clinically significant differences of 1 or 1.5 days. There were few significant differences in other clinical outcomes or values at time points or trends in physiological markers. Benefit was not observed in specific subgroups when explored through interactions with categories of age, sex, surgery type, Aristotle score, or first versus second half of recruitment. Adverse events were similar (sham 5%, RIPC 6%; P=0.68). CONCLUSIONS: RIPC is not associated with important improvements in clinical outcomes and physiological markers after cardiac surgery in children. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00650507.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4310383
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43103832015-02-10 Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Children Undergoing Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Single‐Center Double‐Blinded Randomized Trial McCrindle, Brian W. Clarizia, Nadia A. Khaikin, Svetlana Holtby, Helen M. Manlhiot, Cedric Schwartz, Steven M. Caldarone, Christopher A. Coles, John G. Van Arsdell, Glen S. Scherer, Stephen W. Redington, Andrew N. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) harnesses an innate defensive mechanism that protects against inflammatory activation and ischemia‐reperfusion injury, known sequelae of cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. We sought to determine the impact of RIPC on clinical outcomes and physiological markers related to ischemia‐reperfusion injury and inflammatory activation after cardiac surgery in children. METHODS AND RESULTS: Overall, 299 children (aged neonate to 17 years) were randomized to receive an RIPC stimulus (inflation of a blood pressure cuff on the left thigh to 15 mm Hg above systolic for four 5‐minute intervals) versus a blinded sham stimulus during induction with a standardized anesthesia protocol. Primary outcome was duration of postoperative hospital stay, with serial clinical and laboratory measurements for the first 48 postoperative hours and clinical follow‐up to discharge. There were no significant baseline differences between RIPC (n=148) and sham (n=151). There were no in‐hospital deaths. No significant difference in length of postoperative hospital stay was noted (sham 5.4 versus RIPC 5.6 days; difference +0.2; adjusted P=0.91), with the 95% confidence interval (−0.7 to +0.9) excluding a prespecified minimal clinically significant differences of 1 or 1.5 days. There were few significant differences in other clinical outcomes or values at time points or trends in physiological markers. Benefit was not observed in specific subgroups when explored through interactions with categories of age, sex, surgery type, Aristotle score, or first versus second half of recruitment. Adverse events were similar (sham 5%, RIPC 6%; P=0.68). CONCLUSIONS: RIPC is not associated with important improvements in clinical outcomes and physiological markers after cardiac surgery in children. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00650507. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2014-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4310383/ /pubmed/25074698 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.114.000964 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
McCrindle, Brian W.
Clarizia, Nadia A.
Khaikin, Svetlana
Holtby, Helen M.
Manlhiot, Cedric
Schwartz, Steven M.
Caldarone, Christopher A.
Coles, John G.
Van Arsdell, Glen S.
Scherer, Stephen W.
Redington, Andrew N.
Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Children Undergoing Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Single‐Center Double‐Blinded Randomized Trial
title Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Children Undergoing Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Single‐Center Double‐Blinded Randomized Trial
title_full Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Children Undergoing Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Single‐Center Double‐Blinded Randomized Trial
title_fullStr Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Children Undergoing Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Single‐Center Double‐Blinded Randomized Trial
title_full_unstemmed Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Children Undergoing Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Single‐Center Double‐Blinded Randomized Trial
title_short Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Children Undergoing Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Single‐Center Double‐Blinded Randomized Trial
title_sort remote ischemic preconditioning in children undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a single‐center double‐blinded randomized trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4310383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25074698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.114.000964
work_keys_str_mv AT mccrindlebrianw remoteischemicpreconditioninginchildrenundergoingcardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassasinglecenterdoubleblindedrandomizedtrial
AT clarizianadiaa remoteischemicpreconditioninginchildrenundergoingcardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassasinglecenterdoubleblindedrandomizedtrial
AT khaikinsvetlana remoteischemicpreconditioninginchildrenundergoingcardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassasinglecenterdoubleblindedrandomizedtrial
AT holtbyhelenm remoteischemicpreconditioninginchildrenundergoingcardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassasinglecenterdoubleblindedrandomizedtrial
AT manlhiotcedric remoteischemicpreconditioninginchildrenundergoingcardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassasinglecenterdoubleblindedrandomizedtrial
AT schwartzstevenm remoteischemicpreconditioninginchildrenundergoingcardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassasinglecenterdoubleblindedrandomizedtrial
AT caldaronechristophera remoteischemicpreconditioninginchildrenundergoingcardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassasinglecenterdoubleblindedrandomizedtrial
AT colesjohng remoteischemicpreconditioninginchildrenundergoingcardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassasinglecenterdoubleblindedrandomizedtrial
AT vanarsdellglens remoteischemicpreconditioninginchildrenundergoingcardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassasinglecenterdoubleblindedrandomizedtrial
AT schererstephenw remoteischemicpreconditioninginchildrenundergoingcardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassasinglecenterdoubleblindedrandomizedtrial
AT redingtonandrewn remoteischemicpreconditioninginchildrenundergoingcardiacsurgerywithcardiopulmonarybypassasinglecenterdoubleblindedrandomizedtrial