Cargando…

Choosing Wisely for Syncope: Low‐Value Carotid Ultrasound Use

BACKGROUND: The United States spends more than $750 billion annually on tests and procedures that do not benefit patients. Although there is no physiological indication for carotid ultrasound in “simple” syncope in the absence of focal neurological signs or symptoms suggestive of stroke, there is co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scott, John W., Schwartz, Aaron L., Gates, Jonathan D., Gerhard‐Herman, Marie, Havens, Joaquim M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4310396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25122665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.114.001063
_version_ 1782354866352422912
author Scott, John W.
Schwartz, Aaron L.
Gates, Jonathan D.
Gerhard‐Herman, Marie
Havens, Joaquim M.
author_facet Scott, John W.
Schwartz, Aaron L.
Gates, Jonathan D.
Gerhard‐Herman, Marie
Havens, Joaquim M.
author_sort Scott, John W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The United States spends more than $750 billion annually on tests and procedures that do not benefit patients. Although there is no physiological indication for carotid ultrasound in “simple” syncope in the absence of focal neurological signs or symptoms suggestive of stroke, there is concern that this practice remains common for routine syncope workups. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used a 5% random‐sample Medicare claims database to evaluate large‐scale national trends in utilization of low‐value carotid ultrasound imaging for simple syncope. We found that 16.5% of all Medicare beneficiaries with simple syncope underwent carotid imaging and 6.5% of all carotid ultrasounds ordered in 2009 were for this low‐value indication. These findings were complemented by a manual chart review of 313 patients at a large academic medical center who underwent carotid ultrasound for simple syncope over a 5‐year period. For the 48 (15.4%) of 313 patients with stenosis ≥50%, carotid ultrasound did not yield a causal diagnosis. Only 2% of the 313 patients imaged experienced a change in medications after a positive study, and <1% of patients underwent a carotid revascularization procedure. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that carotid ultrasound for patients with uncomplicated syncope are still commonly ordered and may be an easy target for institutions striving to curtail low‐value care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4310396
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43103962015-02-10 Choosing Wisely for Syncope: Low‐Value Carotid Ultrasound Use Scott, John W. Schwartz, Aaron L. Gates, Jonathan D. Gerhard‐Herman, Marie Havens, Joaquim M. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: The United States spends more than $750 billion annually on tests and procedures that do not benefit patients. Although there is no physiological indication for carotid ultrasound in “simple” syncope in the absence of focal neurological signs or symptoms suggestive of stroke, there is concern that this practice remains common for routine syncope workups. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used a 5% random‐sample Medicare claims database to evaluate large‐scale national trends in utilization of low‐value carotid ultrasound imaging for simple syncope. We found that 16.5% of all Medicare beneficiaries with simple syncope underwent carotid imaging and 6.5% of all carotid ultrasounds ordered in 2009 were for this low‐value indication. These findings were complemented by a manual chart review of 313 patients at a large academic medical center who underwent carotid ultrasound for simple syncope over a 5‐year period. For the 48 (15.4%) of 313 patients with stenosis ≥50%, carotid ultrasound did not yield a causal diagnosis. Only 2% of the 313 patients imaged experienced a change in medications after a positive study, and <1% of patients underwent a carotid revascularization procedure. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that carotid ultrasound for patients with uncomplicated syncope are still commonly ordered and may be an easy target for institutions striving to curtail low‐value care. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2014-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4310396/ /pubmed/25122665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.114.001063 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Scott, John W.
Schwartz, Aaron L.
Gates, Jonathan D.
Gerhard‐Herman, Marie
Havens, Joaquim M.
Choosing Wisely for Syncope: Low‐Value Carotid Ultrasound Use
title Choosing Wisely for Syncope: Low‐Value Carotid Ultrasound Use
title_full Choosing Wisely for Syncope: Low‐Value Carotid Ultrasound Use
title_fullStr Choosing Wisely for Syncope: Low‐Value Carotid Ultrasound Use
title_full_unstemmed Choosing Wisely for Syncope: Low‐Value Carotid Ultrasound Use
title_short Choosing Wisely for Syncope: Low‐Value Carotid Ultrasound Use
title_sort choosing wisely for syncope: low‐value carotid ultrasound use
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4310396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25122665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.114.001063
work_keys_str_mv AT scottjohnw choosingwiselyforsyncopelowvaluecarotidultrasounduse
AT schwartzaaronl choosingwiselyforsyncopelowvaluecarotidultrasounduse
AT gatesjonathand choosingwiselyforsyncopelowvaluecarotidultrasounduse
AT gerhardhermanmarie choosingwiselyforsyncopelowvaluecarotidultrasounduse
AT havensjoaquimm choosingwiselyforsyncopelowvaluecarotidultrasounduse