Cargando…
Phase II, Open Label, Randomized Comparative Trial of Ondansetron Alone versus the Combination of Ondansetron and Aprepitant for the Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies Receiving Regimens Containing High-Dose Cytarabine
Background. Aprepitant is a P/neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist approved for the prevention of CINV in moderate emetic risk chemotherapy. We explored its effectiveness in patients with leukemia receiving cytarabine-based chemotherapy. Methods. Patients were randomized to ondansetron (OND) 8 mg IV 30...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4310492/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25654108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/497597 |
_version_ | 1782354883163193344 |
---|---|
author | Badar, Talha Cortes, Jorge Borthakur, Gautam O'Brien, Susan Wierda, William Garcia-Manero, Guillermo Ferrajoli, Alessandra Kadia, Tapan Poku, Rebeca Kantarjian, Hagop Mattiuzzi, Gloria |
author_facet | Badar, Talha Cortes, Jorge Borthakur, Gautam O'Brien, Susan Wierda, William Garcia-Manero, Guillermo Ferrajoli, Alessandra Kadia, Tapan Poku, Rebeca Kantarjian, Hagop Mattiuzzi, Gloria |
author_sort | Badar, Talha |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. Aprepitant is a P/neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist approved for the prevention of CINV in moderate emetic risk chemotherapy. We explored its effectiveness in patients with leukemia receiving cytarabine-based chemotherapy. Methods. Patients were randomized to ondansetron (OND) 8 mg IV 30 minutes before cytarabine followed by 24 mg IV continuous infusion daily until 6–12 hours after the last dose of chemotherapy alone or with aprepitant (APREP) oral 125 mg 6–12 hrs before chemotherapy and 80 mg daily until 1 day after the last dose of chemotherapy. Results. Forty-nine patients were enrolled in each arm; 42 in OND and 41 in OND + APREP arm were evaluable for efficacy. The ORR with OND + APREP was 80% compared to 67% with OND alone (P = 0.11). On days 6 and 7, higher proportion of patients treated with OND + APREP were free from nausea (74%, 74% versus 68%, 67%; P = 0.27 and 0.18, resp.). Requirement of rescue medications on days 2 and 3 was fewer in OND + APREP arm 7% and 5% compared to 21% and 16% in the OND arm, respectively (P = 0.06 and P = 0.07). Conclusions. There was a trend for overall improvement in emesis with ondansetron plus aprepitant. The potential benefit of this approach with specific chemotherapy combinations remains to be determined. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4310492 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43104922015-02-04 Phase II, Open Label, Randomized Comparative Trial of Ondansetron Alone versus the Combination of Ondansetron and Aprepitant for the Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies Receiving Regimens Containing High-Dose Cytarabine Badar, Talha Cortes, Jorge Borthakur, Gautam O'Brien, Susan Wierda, William Garcia-Manero, Guillermo Ferrajoli, Alessandra Kadia, Tapan Poku, Rebeca Kantarjian, Hagop Mattiuzzi, Gloria Biomed Res Int Clinical Study Background. Aprepitant is a P/neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist approved for the prevention of CINV in moderate emetic risk chemotherapy. We explored its effectiveness in patients with leukemia receiving cytarabine-based chemotherapy. Methods. Patients were randomized to ondansetron (OND) 8 mg IV 30 minutes before cytarabine followed by 24 mg IV continuous infusion daily until 6–12 hours after the last dose of chemotherapy alone or with aprepitant (APREP) oral 125 mg 6–12 hrs before chemotherapy and 80 mg daily until 1 day after the last dose of chemotherapy. Results. Forty-nine patients were enrolled in each arm; 42 in OND and 41 in OND + APREP arm were evaluable for efficacy. The ORR with OND + APREP was 80% compared to 67% with OND alone (P = 0.11). On days 6 and 7, higher proportion of patients treated with OND + APREP were free from nausea (74%, 74% versus 68%, 67%; P = 0.27 and 0.18, resp.). Requirement of rescue medications on days 2 and 3 was fewer in OND + APREP arm 7% and 5% compared to 21% and 16% in the OND arm, respectively (P = 0.06 and P = 0.07). Conclusions. There was a trend for overall improvement in emesis with ondansetron plus aprepitant. The potential benefit of this approach with specific chemotherapy combinations remains to be determined. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4310492/ /pubmed/25654108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/497597 Text en Copyright © 2015 Talha Badar et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Badar, Talha Cortes, Jorge Borthakur, Gautam O'Brien, Susan Wierda, William Garcia-Manero, Guillermo Ferrajoli, Alessandra Kadia, Tapan Poku, Rebeca Kantarjian, Hagop Mattiuzzi, Gloria Phase II, Open Label, Randomized Comparative Trial of Ondansetron Alone versus the Combination of Ondansetron and Aprepitant for the Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies Receiving Regimens Containing High-Dose Cytarabine |
title | Phase II, Open Label, Randomized Comparative Trial of Ondansetron Alone versus the Combination of Ondansetron and Aprepitant for the Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies Receiving Regimens Containing High-Dose Cytarabine |
title_full | Phase II, Open Label, Randomized Comparative Trial of Ondansetron Alone versus the Combination of Ondansetron and Aprepitant for the Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies Receiving Regimens Containing High-Dose Cytarabine |
title_fullStr | Phase II, Open Label, Randomized Comparative Trial of Ondansetron Alone versus the Combination of Ondansetron and Aprepitant for the Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies Receiving Regimens Containing High-Dose Cytarabine |
title_full_unstemmed | Phase II, Open Label, Randomized Comparative Trial of Ondansetron Alone versus the Combination of Ondansetron and Aprepitant for the Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies Receiving Regimens Containing High-Dose Cytarabine |
title_short | Phase II, Open Label, Randomized Comparative Trial of Ondansetron Alone versus the Combination of Ondansetron and Aprepitant for the Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies Receiving Regimens Containing High-Dose Cytarabine |
title_sort | phase ii, open label, randomized comparative trial of ondansetron alone versus the combination of ondansetron and aprepitant for the prevention of nausea and vomiting in patients with hematologic malignancies receiving regimens containing high-dose cytarabine |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4310492/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25654108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/497597 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT badartalha phaseiiopenlabelrandomizedcomparativetrialofondansetronaloneversusthecombinationofondansetronandaprepitantforthepreventionofnauseaandvomitinginpatientswithhematologicmalignanciesreceivingregimenscontaininghighdosecytarabine AT cortesjorge phaseiiopenlabelrandomizedcomparativetrialofondansetronaloneversusthecombinationofondansetronandaprepitantforthepreventionofnauseaandvomitinginpatientswithhematologicmalignanciesreceivingregimenscontaininghighdosecytarabine AT borthakurgautam phaseiiopenlabelrandomizedcomparativetrialofondansetronaloneversusthecombinationofondansetronandaprepitantforthepreventionofnauseaandvomitinginpatientswithhematologicmalignanciesreceivingregimenscontaininghighdosecytarabine AT obriensusan phaseiiopenlabelrandomizedcomparativetrialofondansetronaloneversusthecombinationofondansetronandaprepitantforthepreventionofnauseaandvomitinginpatientswithhematologicmalignanciesreceivingregimenscontaininghighdosecytarabine AT wierdawilliam phaseiiopenlabelrandomizedcomparativetrialofondansetronaloneversusthecombinationofondansetronandaprepitantforthepreventionofnauseaandvomitinginpatientswithhematologicmalignanciesreceivingregimenscontaininghighdosecytarabine AT garciamaneroguillermo phaseiiopenlabelrandomizedcomparativetrialofondansetronaloneversusthecombinationofondansetronandaprepitantforthepreventionofnauseaandvomitinginpatientswithhematologicmalignanciesreceivingregimenscontaininghighdosecytarabine AT ferrajolialessandra phaseiiopenlabelrandomizedcomparativetrialofondansetronaloneversusthecombinationofondansetronandaprepitantforthepreventionofnauseaandvomitinginpatientswithhematologicmalignanciesreceivingregimenscontaininghighdosecytarabine AT kadiatapan phaseiiopenlabelrandomizedcomparativetrialofondansetronaloneversusthecombinationofondansetronandaprepitantforthepreventionofnauseaandvomitinginpatientswithhematologicmalignanciesreceivingregimenscontaininghighdosecytarabine AT pokurebeca phaseiiopenlabelrandomizedcomparativetrialofondansetronaloneversusthecombinationofondansetronandaprepitantforthepreventionofnauseaandvomitinginpatientswithhematologicmalignanciesreceivingregimenscontaininghighdosecytarabine AT kantarjianhagop phaseiiopenlabelrandomizedcomparativetrialofondansetronaloneversusthecombinationofondansetronandaprepitantforthepreventionofnauseaandvomitinginpatientswithhematologicmalignanciesreceivingregimenscontaininghighdosecytarabine AT mattiuzzigloria phaseiiopenlabelrandomizedcomparativetrialofondansetronaloneversusthecombinationofondansetronandaprepitantforthepreventionofnauseaandvomitinginpatientswithhematologicmalignanciesreceivingregimenscontaininghighdosecytarabine |