Cargando…
Evaluation of a Minimally Invasive Cell Sampling Device Coupled with Assessment of Trefoil Factor 3 Expression for Diagnosing Barrett's Esophagus: A Multi-Center Case–Control Study
BACKGROUND: Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a commonly undiagnosed condition that predisposes to esophageal adenocarcinoma. Routine endoscopic screening for BE is not recommended because of the burden this would impose on the health care system. The objective of this study was to determine whether...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4310596/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25634542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001780 |
_version_ | 1782354891061067776 |
---|---|
author | Ross-Innes, Caryn S. Debiram-Beecham, Irene O'Donovan, Maria Walker, Elaine Varghese, Sibu Lao-Sirieix, Pierre Lovat, Laurence Griffin, Michael Ragunath, Krish Haidry, Rehan Sami, Sarmed S. Kaye, Philip Novelli, Marco Disep, Babett Ostler, Richard Aigret, Benoit North, Bernard V. Bhandari, Pradeep Haycock, Adam Morris, Danielle Attwood, Stephen Dhar, Anjan Rees, Colin Rutter, Matthew D. D. Sasieni, Peter D. Fitzgerald, Rebecca C. |
author_facet | Ross-Innes, Caryn S. Debiram-Beecham, Irene O'Donovan, Maria Walker, Elaine Varghese, Sibu Lao-Sirieix, Pierre Lovat, Laurence Griffin, Michael Ragunath, Krish Haidry, Rehan Sami, Sarmed S. Kaye, Philip Novelli, Marco Disep, Babett Ostler, Richard Aigret, Benoit North, Bernard V. Bhandari, Pradeep Haycock, Adam Morris, Danielle Attwood, Stephen Dhar, Anjan Rees, Colin Rutter, Matthew D. D. Sasieni, Peter D. Fitzgerald, Rebecca C. |
author_sort | Ross-Innes, Caryn S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a commonly undiagnosed condition that predisposes to esophageal adenocarcinoma. Routine endoscopic screening for BE is not recommended because of the burden this would impose on the health care system. The objective of this study was to determine whether a novel approach using a minimally invasive cell sampling device, the Cytosponge, coupled with immunohistochemical staining for the biomarker Trefoil Factor 3 (TFF3), could be used to identify patients who warrant endoscopy to diagnose BE. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A case–control study was performed across 11 UK hospitals between July 2011 and December 2013. In total, 1,110 individuals comprising 463 controls with dyspepsia and reflux symptoms and 647 BE cases swallowed a Cytosponge prior to endoscopy. The primary outcome measures were to evaluate the safety, acceptability, and accuracy of the Cytosponge-TFF3 test compared with endoscopy and biopsy. In all, 1,042 (93.9%) patients successfully swallowed the Cytosponge, and no serious adverse events were attributed to the device. The Cytosponge was rated favorably, using a visual analogue scale, compared with endoscopy (p < 0.001), and patients who were not sedated for endoscopy were more likely to rate the Cytosponge higher than endoscopy (Mann-Whitney test, p < 0.001). The overall sensitivity of the test was 79.9% (95% CI 76.4%–83.0%), increasing to 87.2% (95% CI 83.0%–90.6%) for patients with ≥3 cm of circumferential BE, known to confer a higher cancer risk. The sensitivity increased to 89.7% (95% CI 82.3%–94.8%) in 107 patients who swallowed the device twice during the study course. There was no loss of sensitivity in patients with dysplasia. The specificity for diagnosing BE was 92.4% (95% CI 89.5%–94.7%). The case–control design of the study means that the results are not generalizable to a primary care population. Another limitation is that the acceptability data were limited to a single measure. CONCLUSIONS: The Cytosponge-TFF3 test is safe and acceptable, and has accuracy comparable to other screening tests. This test may be a simple and inexpensive approach to identify patients with reflux symptoms who warrant endoscopy to diagnose BE. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4310596 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43105962015-02-06 Evaluation of a Minimally Invasive Cell Sampling Device Coupled with Assessment of Trefoil Factor 3 Expression for Diagnosing Barrett's Esophagus: A Multi-Center Case–Control Study Ross-Innes, Caryn S. Debiram-Beecham, Irene O'Donovan, Maria Walker, Elaine Varghese, Sibu Lao-Sirieix, Pierre Lovat, Laurence Griffin, Michael Ragunath, Krish Haidry, Rehan Sami, Sarmed S. Kaye, Philip Novelli, Marco Disep, Babett Ostler, Richard Aigret, Benoit North, Bernard V. Bhandari, Pradeep Haycock, Adam Morris, Danielle Attwood, Stephen Dhar, Anjan Rees, Colin Rutter, Matthew D. D. Sasieni, Peter D. Fitzgerald, Rebecca C. PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a commonly undiagnosed condition that predisposes to esophageal adenocarcinoma. Routine endoscopic screening for BE is not recommended because of the burden this would impose on the health care system. The objective of this study was to determine whether a novel approach using a minimally invasive cell sampling device, the Cytosponge, coupled with immunohistochemical staining for the biomarker Trefoil Factor 3 (TFF3), could be used to identify patients who warrant endoscopy to diagnose BE. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A case–control study was performed across 11 UK hospitals between July 2011 and December 2013. In total, 1,110 individuals comprising 463 controls with dyspepsia and reflux symptoms and 647 BE cases swallowed a Cytosponge prior to endoscopy. The primary outcome measures were to evaluate the safety, acceptability, and accuracy of the Cytosponge-TFF3 test compared with endoscopy and biopsy. In all, 1,042 (93.9%) patients successfully swallowed the Cytosponge, and no serious adverse events were attributed to the device. The Cytosponge was rated favorably, using a visual analogue scale, compared with endoscopy (p < 0.001), and patients who were not sedated for endoscopy were more likely to rate the Cytosponge higher than endoscopy (Mann-Whitney test, p < 0.001). The overall sensitivity of the test was 79.9% (95% CI 76.4%–83.0%), increasing to 87.2% (95% CI 83.0%–90.6%) for patients with ≥3 cm of circumferential BE, known to confer a higher cancer risk. The sensitivity increased to 89.7% (95% CI 82.3%–94.8%) in 107 patients who swallowed the device twice during the study course. There was no loss of sensitivity in patients with dysplasia. The specificity for diagnosing BE was 92.4% (95% CI 89.5%–94.7%). The case–control design of the study means that the results are not generalizable to a primary care population. Another limitation is that the acceptability data were limited to a single measure. CONCLUSIONS: The Cytosponge-TFF3 test is safe and acceptable, and has accuracy comparable to other screening tests. This test may be a simple and inexpensive approach to identify patients with reflux symptoms who warrant endoscopy to diagnose BE. Public Library of Science 2015-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4310596/ /pubmed/25634542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001780 Text en © 2015 Ross-Innes et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ross-Innes, Caryn S. Debiram-Beecham, Irene O'Donovan, Maria Walker, Elaine Varghese, Sibu Lao-Sirieix, Pierre Lovat, Laurence Griffin, Michael Ragunath, Krish Haidry, Rehan Sami, Sarmed S. Kaye, Philip Novelli, Marco Disep, Babett Ostler, Richard Aigret, Benoit North, Bernard V. Bhandari, Pradeep Haycock, Adam Morris, Danielle Attwood, Stephen Dhar, Anjan Rees, Colin Rutter, Matthew D. D. Sasieni, Peter D. Fitzgerald, Rebecca C. Evaluation of a Minimally Invasive Cell Sampling Device Coupled with Assessment of Trefoil Factor 3 Expression for Diagnosing Barrett's Esophagus: A Multi-Center Case–Control Study |
title | Evaluation of a Minimally Invasive Cell Sampling Device Coupled with Assessment of Trefoil Factor 3 Expression for Diagnosing Barrett's Esophagus: A Multi-Center Case–Control Study |
title_full | Evaluation of a Minimally Invasive Cell Sampling Device Coupled with Assessment of Trefoil Factor 3 Expression for Diagnosing Barrett's Esophagus: A Multi-Center Case–Control Study |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a Minimally Invasive Cell Sampling Device Coupled with Assessment of Trefoil Factor 3 Expression for Diagnosing Barrett's Esophagus: A Multi-Center Case–Control Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a Minimally Invasive Cell Sampling Device Coupled with Assessment of Trefoil Factor 3 Expression for Diagnosing Barrett's Esophagus: A Multi-Center Case–Control Study |
title_short | Evaluation of a Minimally Invasive Cell Sampling Device Coupled with Assessment of Trefoil Factor 3 Expression for Diagnosing Barrett's Esophagus: A Multi-Center Case–Control Study |
title_sort | evaluation of a minimally invasive cell sampling device coupled with assessment of trefoil factor 3 expression for diagnosing barrett's esophagus: a multi-center case–control study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4310596/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25634542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001780 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rossinnescaryns evaluationofaminimallyinvasivecellsamplingdevicecoupledwithassessmentoftrefoilfactor3expressionfordiagnosingbarrettsesophagusamulticentercasecontrolstudy AT debirambeechamirene evaluationofaminimallyinvasivecellsamplingdevicecoupledwithassessmentoftrefoilfactor3expressionfordiagnosingbarrettsesophagusamulticentercasecontrolstudy AT odonovanmaria evaluationofaminimallyinvasivecellsamplingdevicecoupledwithassessmentoftrefoilfactor3expressionfordiagnosingbarrettsesophagusamulticentercasecontrolstudy AT walkerelaine evaluationofaminimallyinvasivecellsamplingdevicecoupledwithassessmentoftrefoilfactor3expressionfordiagnosingbarrettsesophagusamulticentercasecontrolstudy AT varghesesibu evaluationofaminimallyinvasivecellsamplingdevicecoupledwithassessmentoftrefoilfactor3expressionfordiagnosingbarrettsesophagusamulticentercasecontrolstudy AT laosirieixpierre evaluationofaminimallyinvasivecellsamplingdevicecoupledwithassessmentoftrefoilfactor3expressionfordiagnosingbarrettsesophagusamulticentercasecontrolstudy AT lovatlaurence evaluationofaminimallyinvasivecellsamplingdevicecoupledwithassessmentoftrefoilfactor3expressionfordiagnosingbarrettsesophagusamulticentercasecontrolstudy AT griffinmichael evaluationofaminimallyinvasivecellsamplingdevicecoupledwithassessmentoftrefoilfactor3expressionfordiagnosingbarrettsesophagusamulticentercasecontrolstudy AT ragunathkrish evaluationofaminimallyinvasivecellsamplingdevicecoupledwithassessmentoftrefoilfactor3expressionfordiagnosingbarrettsesophagusamulticentercasecontrolstudy AT haidryrehan evaluationofaminimallyinvasivecellsamplingdevicecoupledwithassessmentoftrefoilfactor3expressionfordiagnosingbarrettsesophagusamulticentercasecontrolstudy AT samisarmeds evaluationofaminimallyinvasivecellsamplingdevicecoupledwithassessmentoftrefoilfactor3expressionfordiagnosingbarrettsesophagusamulticentercasecontrolstudy AT kayephilip evaluationofaminimallyinvasivecellsamplingdevicecoupledwithassessmentoftrefoilfactor3expressionfordiagnosingbarrettsesophagusamulticentercasecontrolstudy AT novellimarco evaluationofaminimallyinvasivecellsamplingdevicecoupledwithassessmentoftrefoilfactor3expressionfordiagnosingbarrettsesophagusamulticentercasecontrolstudy AT disepbabett evaluationofaminimallyinvasivecellsamplingdevicecoupledwithassessmentoftrefoilfactor3expressionfordiagnosingbarrettsesophagusamulticentercasecontrolstudy AT ostlerrichard evaluationofaminimallyinvasivecellsamplingdevicecoupledwithassessmentoftrefoilfactor3expressionfordiagnosingbarrettsesophagusamulticentercasecontrolstudy AT aigretbenoit evaluationofaminimallyinvasivecellsamplingdevicecoupledwithassessmentoftrefoilfactor3expressionfordiagnosingbarrettsesophagusamulticentercasecontrolstudy AT northbernardv evaluationofaminimallyinvasivecellsamplingdevicecoupledwithassessmentoftrefoilfactor3expressionfordiagnosingbarrettsesophagusamulticentercasecontrolstudy AT bhandaripradeep evaluationofaminimallyinvasivecellsamplingdevicecoupledwithassessmentoftrefoilfactor3expressionfordiagnosingbarrettsesophagusamulticentercasecontrolstudy AT haycockadam evaluationofaminimallyinvasivecellsamplingdevicecoupledwithassessmentoftrefoilfactor3expressionfordiagnosingbarrettsesophagusamulticentercasecontrolstudy AT morrisdanielle evaluationofaminimallyinvasivecellsamplingdevicecoupledwithassessmentoftrefoilfactor3expressionfordiagnosingbarrettsesophagusamulticentercasecontrolstudy AT attwoodstephen evaluationofaminimallyinvasivecellsamplingdevicecoupledwithassessmentoftrefoilfactor3expressionfordiagnosingbarrettsesophagusamulticentercasecontrolstudy AT dharanjan evaluationofaminimallyinvasivecellsamplingdevicecoupledwithassessmentoftrefoilfactor3expressionfordiagnosingbarrettsesophagusamulticentercasecontrolstudy AT reescolin evaluationofaminimallyinvasivecellsamplingdevicecoupledwithassessmentoftrefoilfactor3expressionfordiagnosingbarrettsesophagusamulticentercasecontrolstudy AT ruttermatthewdd evaluationofaminimallyinvasivecellsamplingdevicecoupledwithassessmentoftrefoilfactor3expressionfordiagnosingbarrettsesophagusamulticentercasecontrolstudy AT sasienipeterd evaluationofaminimallyinvasivecellsamplingdevicecoupledwithassessmentoftrefoilfactor3expressionfordiagnosingbarrettsesophagusamulticentercasecontrolstudy AT fitzgeraldrebeccac evaluationofaminimallyinvasivecellsamplingdevicecoupledwithassessmentoftrefoilfactor3expressionfordiagnosingbarrettsesophagusamulticentercasecontrolstudy AT evaluationofaminimallyinvasivecellsamplingdevicecoupledwithassessmentoftrefoilfactor3expressionfordiagnosingbarrettsesophagusamulticentercasecontrolstudy |