Cargando…

Alvimopan: A cost–effective tool to decrease cystectomy length of stay

INTRODUCTION: We sought to evaluate the cost effectiveness of perioperative use of alvimopan in cystectomy and urinary diversion. A recent randomized controlled trial demonstrated the efficacy of alvimopan in reducing postoperative ileus and length of stay in cystectomy; however, a major limitation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manger, Jules Powers, Nelson, Marc, Blanchard, Shawnna, Helo, Sevann, Conaway, Mark, Krupski, Tracey L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Polish Urological Association 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4310883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25667750
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2014.04.art4
_version_ 1782354920748351488
author Manger, Jules Powers
Nelson, Marc
Blanchard, Shawnna
Helo, Sevann
Conaway, Mark
Krupski, Tracey L.
author_facet Manger, Jules Powers
Nelson, Marc
Blanchard, Shawnna
Helo, Sevann
Conaway, Mark
Krupski, Tracey L.
author_sort Manger, Jules Powers
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: We sought to evaluate the cost effectiveness of perioperative use of alvimopan in cystectomy and urinary diversion. A recent randomized controlled trial demonstrated the efficacy of alvimopan in reducing postoperative ileus and length of stay in cystectomy; however, a major limitation was the exclusion of epidural analgesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty–six cystectomy and urinary diversion procedures performed by seven surgeons were analyzed between January 2008 and April 2012. The first 50 patients did not receive alvimopan perioperatively, while the subsequent 36 received a single dose of 12 mg preoperatively and then 12 mg every 12 hours for 15 doses or until discharge. RESULTS: The groups were equal with respect to age, gender, indication, surgeon, and type of diversion. Patients who received alvimopan experienced a shorter length of stay (LOS) versus those in who did not receive alvimopan (10.5 vs. 8.6 days, p = 0.005, 95% CI 0.6–3.3). Readmission for ileus was low in both alvimopan and control groups (0% and 4.4%, respectively). Costs were significantly lower in the alvimopan group than the control groups (2012 USD 32,443 vs. 40,604 p <0.001). This difference stood up to multivariate analysis with a $7,062 difference in hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Use of alvimopan in the routine perioperative care of our cystectomy and urinary diversion patients has decreased LOS by 1.9 days. Additionally, institution of routine perioperative alvimopan has reduced costs by $7,062 per admission (20% reduction). This demonstrates a real world application of alvimopan at a moderate volume center.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4310883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Polish Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43108832015-02-09 Alvimopan: A cost–effective tool to decrease cystectomy length of stay Manger, Jules Powers Nelson, Marc Blanchard, Shawnna Helo, Sevann Conaway, Mark Krupski, Tracey L. Cent European J Urol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: We sought to evaluate the cost effectiveness of perioperative use of alvimopan in cystectomy and urinary diversion. A recent randomized controlled trial demonstrated the efficacy of alvimopan in reducing postoperative ileus and length of stay in cystectomy; however, a major limitation was the exclusion of epidural analgesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty–six cystectomy and urinary diversion procedures performed by seven surgeons were analyzed between January 2008 and April 2012. The first 50 patients did not receive alvimopan perioperatively, while the subsequent 36 received a single dose of 12 mg preoperatively and then 12 mg every 12 hours for 15 doses or until discharge. RESULTS: The groups were equal with respect to age, gender, indication, surgeon, and type of diversion. Patients who received alvimopan experienced a shorter length of stay (LOS) versus those in who did not receive alvimopan (10.5 vs. 8.6 days, p = 0.005, 95% CI 0.6–3.3). Readmission for ileus was low in both alvimopan and control groups (0% and 4.4%, respectively). Costs were significantly lower in the alvimopan group than the control groups (2012 USD 32,443 vs. 40,604 p <0.001). This difference stood up to multivariate analysis with a $7,062 difference in hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Use of alvimopan in the routine perioperative care of our cystectomy and urinary diversion patients has decreased LOS by 1.9 days. Additionally, institution of routine perioperative alvimopan has reduced costs by $7,062 per admission (20% reduction). This demonstrates a real world application of alvimopan at a moderate volume center. Polish Urological Association 2014-12-05 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4310883/ /pubmed/25667750 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2014.04.art4 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Manger, Jules Powers
Nelson, Marc
Blanchard, Shawnna
Helo, Sevann
Conaway, Mark
Krupski, Tracey L.
Alvimopan: A cost–effective tool to decrease cystectomy length of stay
title Alvimopan: A cost–effective tool to decrease cystectomy length of stay
title_full Alvimopan: A cost–effective tool to decrease cystectomy length of stay
title_fullStr Alvimopan: A cost–effective tool to decrease cystectomy length of stay
title_full_unstemmed Alvimopan: A cost–effective tool to decrease cystectomy length of stay
title_short Alvimopan: A cost–effective tool to decrease cystectomy length of stay
title_sort alvimopan: a cost–effective tool to decrease cystectomy length of stay
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4310883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25667750
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2014.04.art4
work_keys_str_mv AT mangerjulespowers alvimopanacosteffectivetooltodecreasecystectomylengthofstay
AT nelsonmarc alvimopanacosteffectivetooltodecreasecystectomylengthofstay
AT blanchardshawnna alvimopanacosteffectivetooltodecreasecystectomylengthofstay
AT helosevann alvimopanacosteffectivetooltodecreasecystectomylengthofstay
AT conawaymark alvimopanacosteffectivetooltodecreasecystectomylengthofstay
AT krupskitraceyl alvimopanacosteffectivetooltodecreasecystectomylengthofstay