Cargando…
Alvimopan: A cost–effective tool to decrease cystectomy length of stay
INTRODUCTION: We sought to evaluate the cost effectiveness of perioperative use of alvimopan in cystectomy and urinary diversion. A recent randomized controlled trial demonstrated the efficacy of alvimopan in reducing postoperative ileus and length of stay in cystectomy; however, a major limitation...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Polish Urological Association
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4310883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25667750 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2014.04.art4 |
_version_ | 1782354920748351488 |
---|---|
author | Manger, Jules Powers Nelson, Marc Blanchard, Shawnna Helo, Sevann Conaway, Mark Krupski, Tracey L. |
author_facet | Manger, Jules Powers Nelson, Marc Blanchard, Shawnna Helo, Sevann Conaway, Mark Krupski, Tracey L. |
author_sort | Manger, Jules Powers |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: We sought to evaluate the cost effectiveness of perioperative use of alvimopan in cystectomy and urinary diversion. A recent randomized controlled trial demonstrated the efficacy of alvimopan in reducing postoperative ileus and length of stay in cystectomy; however, a major limitation was the exclusion of epidural analgesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty–six cystectomy and urinary diversion procedures performed by seven surgeons were analyzed between January 2008 and April 2012. The first 50 patients did not receive alvimopan perioperatively, while the subsequent 36 received a single dose of 12 mg preoperatively and then 12 mg every 12 hours for 15 doses or until discharge. RESULTS: The groups were equal with respect to age, gender, indication, surgeon, and type of diversion. Patients who received alvimopan experienced a shorter length of stay (LOS) versus those in who did not receive alvimopan (10.5 vs. 8.6 days, p = 0.005, 95% CI 0.6–3.3). Readmission for ileus was low in both alvimopan and control groups (0% and 4.4%, respectively). Costs were significantly lower in the alvimopan group than the control groups (2012 USD 32,443 vs. 40,604 p <0.001). This difference stood up to multivariate analysis with a $7,062 difference in hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Use of alvimopan in the routine perioperative care of our cystectomy and urinary diversion patients has decreased LOS by 1.9 days. Additionally, institution of routine perioperative alvimopan has reduced costs by $7,062 per admission (20% reduction). This demonstrates a real world application of alvimopan at a moderate volume center. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4310883 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Polish Urological Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43108832015-02-09 Alvimopan: A cost–effective tool to decrease cystectomy length of stay Manger, Jules Powers Nelson, Marc Blanchard, Shawnna Helo, Sevann Conaway, Mark Krupski, Tracey L. Cent European J Urol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: We sought to evaluate the cost effectiveness of perioperative use of alvimopan in cystectomy and urinary diversion. A recent randomized controlled trial demonstrated the efficacy of alvimopan in reducing postoperative ileus and length of stay in cystectomy; however, a major limitation was the exclusion of epidural analgesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty–six cystectomy and urinary diversion procedures performed by seven surgeons were analyzed between January 2008 and April 2012. The first 50 patients did not receive alvimopan perioperatively, while the subsequent 36 received a single dose of 12 mg preoperatively and then 12 mg every 12 hours for 15 doses or until discharge. RESULTS: The groups were equal with respect to age, gender, indication, surgeon, and type of diversion. Patients who received alvimopan experienced a shorter length of stay (LOS) versus those in who did not receive alvimopan (10.5 vs. 8.6 days, p = 0.005, 95% CI 0.6–3.3). Readmission for ileus was low in both alvimopan and control groups (0% and 4.4%, respectively). Costs were significantly lower in the alvimopan group than the control groups (2012 USD 32,443 vs. 40,604 p <0.001). This difference stood up to multivariate analysis with a $7,062 difference in hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Use of alvimopan in the routine perioperative care of our cystectomy and urinary diversion patients has decreased LOS by 1.9 days. Additionally, institution of routine perioperative alvimopan has reduced costs by $7,062 per admission (20% reduction). This demonstrates a real world application of alvimopan at a moderate volume center. Polish Urological Association 2014-12-05 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4310883/ /pubmed/25667750 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2014.04.art4 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Manger, Jules Powers Nelson, Marc Blanchard, Shawnna Helo, Sevann Conaway, Mark Krupski, Tracey L. Alvimopan: A cost–effective tool to decrease cystectomy length of stay |
title | Alvimopan: A cost–effective tool to decrease cystectomy length of stay |
title_full | Alvimopan: A cost–effective tool to decrease cystectomy length of stay |
title_fullStr | Alvimopan: A cost–effective tool to decrease cystectomy length of stay |
title_full_unstemmed | Alvimopan: A cost–effective tool to decrease cystectomy length of stay |
title_short | Alvimopan: A cost–effective tool to decrease cystectomy length of stay |
title_sort | alvimopan: a cost–effective tool to decrease cystectomy length of stay |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4310883/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25667750 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2014.04.art4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mangerjulespowers alvimopanacosteffectivetooltodecreasecystectomylengthofstay AT nelsonmarc alvimopanacosteffectivetooltodecreasecystectomylengthofstay AT blanchardshawnna alvimopanacosteffectivetooltodecreasecystectomylengthofstay AT helosevann alvimopanacosteffectivetooltodecreasecystectomylengthofstay AT conawaymark alvimopanacosteffectivetooltodecreasecystectomylengthofstay AT krupskitraceyl alvimopanacosteffectivetooltodecreasecystectomylengthofstay |