Cargando…

Microvesicles as a Biomarker for Tumor Progression versus Treatment Effect in Radiation/Temozolomide-Treated Glioblastoma Patients

The standard of care for glioblastoma (GB) is surgery followed by concurrent radiation therapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) and then adjuvant TMZ. This regime is associated with increased survival but also increased occurrence of equivocal imaging findings, e.g., tumor progression (TP) versus treatme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koch, Cameron J., Lustig, Robert A., Yang, Xiang-Yang, Jenkins, Walter T., Wolf, Ronald L., Martinez-Lage, Maria, Desai, Arati, Williams, Dewight, Evans, Sydney M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Neoplasia Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4311040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25500085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2014.10.004
_version_ 1782354943361941504
author Koch, Cameron J.
Lustig, Robert A.
Yang, Xiang-Yang
Jenkins, Walter T.
Wolf, Ronald L.
Martinez-Lage, Maria
Desai, Arati
Williams, Dewight
Evans, Sydney M.
author_facet Koch, Cameron J.
Lustig, Robert A.
Yang, Xiang-Yang
Jenkins, Walter T.
Wolf, Ronald L.
Martinez-Lage, Maria
Desai, Arati
Williams, Dewight
Evans, Sydney M.
author_sort Koch, Cameron J.
collection PubMed
description The standard of care for glioblastoma (GB) is surgery followed by concurrent radiation therapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) and then adjuvant TMZ. This regime is associated with increased survival but also increased occurrence of equivocal imaging findings, e.g., tumor progression (TP) versus treatment effect (TE), which is also referred to as pseudoprogression (PsP). Equivocal findings make decisions regarding further treatment difficult and often delayed. Because none of the current imaging assays have proven sensitive and specific for differentiation of TP versus TE/PsP, we investigated whether blood-derived microvesicles (MVs) would be a relevant assay. METHODS: 2.8 ml of citrated blood was collected from patients with GB at the time of their RT simulation, at the end of chemoradiation therapy (CRT), and multiple times following treatment. MVs were collected following multiple centrifugations (300g, 2500g, and 15,000g). The pellet from the final spin was analyzed using flow cytometry. A diameter of approximately 300 nm or greater and Pacific Blue–labeled Annexin V positivity were used to identify the MVs reported herein. RESULTS: We analyzed 19 blood samples from 11 patients with GB. MV counts in the patients with stable disease or TE/PsP were significantly lower than patients who developed TP (P = .014). CONCLUSION: These preliminary data suggest that blood analysis for MVs from GB patients receiving CRT may be useful to distinguish TE/PsP from TP. MVs may add clarity to standard imaging for decision making in patients with equivocal imaging findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4311040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Neoplasia Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43110402015-02-14 Microvesicles as a Biomarker for Tumor Progression versus Treatment Effect in Radiation/Temozolomide-Treated Glioblastoma Patients Koch, Cameron J. Lustig, Robert A. Yang, Xiang-Yang Jenkins, Walter T. Wolf, Ronald L. Martinez-Lage, Maria Desai, Arati Williams, Dewight Evans, Sydney M. Transl Oncol Article The standard of care for glioblastoma (GB) is surgery followed by concurrent radiation therapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) and then adjuvant TMZ. This regime is associated with increased survival but also increased occurrence of equivocal imaging findings, e.g., tumor progression (TP) versus treatment effect (TE), which is also referred to as pseudoprogression (PsP). Equivocal findings make decisions regarding further treatment difficult and often delayed. Because none of the current imaging assays have proven sensitive and specific for differentiation of TP versus TE/PsP, we investigated whether blood-derived microvesicles (MVs) would be a relevant assay. METHODS: 2.8 ml of citrated blood was collected from patients with GB at the time of their RT simulation, at the end of chemoradiation therapy (CRT), and multiple times following treatment. MVs were collected following multiple centrifugations (300g, 2500g, and 15,000g). The pellet from the final spin was analyzed using flow cytometry. A diameter of approximately 300 nm or greater and Pacific Blue–labeled Annexin V positivity were used to identify the MVs reported herein. RESULTS: We analyzed 19 blood samples from 11 patients with GB. MV counts in the patients with stable disease or TE/PsP were significantly lower than patients who developed TP (P = .014). CONCLUSION: These preliminary data suggest that blood analysis for MVs from GB patients receiving CRT may be useful to distinguish TE/PsP from TP. MVs may add clarity to standard imaging for decision making in patients with equivocal imaging findings. Neoplasia Press 2014-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4311040/ /pubmed/25500085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2014.10.004 Text en © 2014 Neoplasia Press, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Koch, Cameron J.
Lustig, Robert A.
Yang, Xiang-Yang
Jenkins, Walter T.
Wolf, Ronald L.
Martinez-Lage, Maria
Desai, Arati
Williams, Dewight
Evans, Sydney M.
Microvesicles as a Biomarker for Tumor Progression versus Treatment Effect in Radiation/Temozolomide-Treated Glioblastoma Patients
title Microvesicles as a Biomarker for Tumor Progression versus Treatment Effect in Radiation/Temozolomide-Treated Glioblastoma Patients
title_full Microvesicles as a Biomarker for Tumor Progression versus Treatment Effect in Radiation/Temozolomide-Treated Glioblastoma Patients
title_fullStr Microvesicles as a Biomarker for Tumor Progression versus Treatment Effect in Radiation/Temozolomide-Treated Glioblastoma Patients
title_full_unstemmed Microvesicles as a Biomarker for Tumor Progression versus Treatment Effect in Radiation/Temozolomide-Treated Glioblastoma Patients
title_short Microvesicles as a Biomarker for Tumor Progression versus Treatment Effect in Radiation/Temozolomide-Treated Glioblastoma Patients
title_sort microvesicles as a biomarker for tumor progression versus treatment effect in radiation/temozolomide-treated glioblastoma patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4311040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25500085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2014.10.004
work_keys_str_mv AT kochcameronj microvesiclesasabiomarkerfortumorprogressionversustreatmenteffectinradiationtemozolomidetreatedglioblastomapatients
AT lustigroberta microvesiclesasabiomarkerfortumorprogressionversustreatmenteffectinradiationtemozolomidetreatedglioblastomapatients
AT yangxiangyang microvesiclesasabiomarkerfortumorprogressionversustreatmenteffectinradiationtemozolomidetreatedglioblastomapatients
AT jenkinswaltert microvesiclesasabiomarkerfortumorprogressionversustreatmenteffectinradiationtemozolomidetreatedglioblastomapatients
AT wolfronaldl microvesiclesasabiomarkerfortumorprogressionversustreatmenteffectinradiationtemozolomidetreatedglioblastomapatients
AT martinezlagemaria microvesiclesasabiomarkerfortumorprogressionversustreatmenteffectinradiationtemozolomidetreatedglioblastomapatients
AT desaiarati microvesiclesasabiomarkerfortumorprogressionversustreatmenteffectinradiationtemozolomidetreatedglioblastomapatients
AT williamsdewight microvesiclesasabiomarkerfortumorprogressionversustreatmenteffectinradiationtemozolomidetreatedglioblastomapatients
AT evanssydneym microvesiclesasabiomarkerfortumorprogressionversustreatmenteffectinradiationtemozolomidetreatedglioblastomapatients