Cargando…

Comparison of an extended-release formulation of granisetron (APF530) versus palonosetron for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy: results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority phase 3 trial

PURPOSE: Subcutaneous APF530 provides controlled sustained release of granisetron to prevent acute (0–24 h) and delayed (24–120 h) chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). This randomized, double-blind phase 3 trial compared APF530 and palonosetron in preventing acute and delayed CINV after...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raftopoulos, Harry, Cooper, William, O’Boyle, Erin, Gabrail, Nashat, Boccia, Ralph, Gralla, Richard J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4311069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25179689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2400-3
_version_ 1782354948235722752
author Raftopoulos, Harry
Cooper, William
O’Boyle, Erin
Gabrail, Nashat
Boccia, Ralph
Gralla, Richard J.
author_facet Raftopoulos, Harry
Cooper, William
O’Boyle, Erin
Gabrail, Nashat
Boccia, Ralph
Gralla, Richard J.
author_sort Raftopoulos, Harry
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Subcutaneous APF530 provides controlled sustained release of granisetron to prevent acute (0–24 h) and delayed (24–120 h) chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). This randomized, double-blind phase 3 trial compared APF530 and palonosetron in preventing acute and delayed CINV after moderately (MEC) or highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). METHODS: Patients receiving single-day MEC or HEC received single-dose APF530 250 or 500 mg subcutaneously (SC) (granisetron 5 or 10 mg) or intravenous palonosetron 0.25 mg. Primary objectives were to establish APF530 noninferiority to palonosetron for preventing acute CINV following MEC or HEC and delayed CINV following MEC and to determine APF530 superiority to palonosetron for preventing delayed CINV following HEC. The primary efficacy end point was complete response (CR [using CI difference for APF530 − palonosetron]). A lower confidence bound greater than −15 % indicated noninferiority. RESULTS: In the modified intent-to-treat population (MEC = 634; HEC = 707), both APF530 doses were noninferior to palonosetron in preventing acute CINV after MEC (CRs 74.8 % [−9.8, 9.3] and 76.9 % [−7.5, 11.4], respectively, vs. 75.0 % palonosetron) and after HEC (CRs 77.7 % [−11.5, 5.5] and 81.3 % [-7.7, 8.7], respectively, vs. 80.7 % palonosetron). APF530 500 mg was noninferior to palonosetron in preventing delayed CINV after MEC (CR 58.5 % [−9.5, 12.1] vs. 57.2 % palonosetron) but not superior in preventing delayed CINV after HEC. Adverse events were generally mild and unrelated to treatment, the most common (excluding injection-site reactions) being constipation. CONCLUSIONS: A single subcutaneous APF530 injection offers a convenient alternative to palonosetron for preventing acute and delayed CINV after MEC or HEC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4311069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43110692015-02-02 Comparison of an extended-release formulation of granisetron (APF530) versus palonosetron for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy: results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority phase 3 trial Raftopoulos, Harry Cooper, William O’Boyle, Erin Gabrail, Nashat Boccia, Ralph Gralla, Richard J. Support Care Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: Subcutaneous APF530 provides controlled sustained release of granisetron to prevent acute (0–24 h) and delayed (24–120 h) chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). This randomized, double-blind phase 3 trial compared APF530 and palonosetron in preventing acute and delayed CINV after moderately (MEC) or highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). METHODS: Patients receiving single-day MEC or HEC received single-dose APF530 250 or 500 mg subcutaneously (SC) (granisetron 5 or 10 mg) or intravenous palonosetron 0.25 mg. Primary objectives were to establish APF530 noninferiority to palonosetron for preventing acute CINV following MEC or HEC and delayed CINV following MEC and to determine APF530 superiority to palonosetron for preventing delayed CINV following HEC. The primary efficacy end point was complete response (CR [using CI difference for APF530 − palonosetron]). A lower confidence bound greater than −15 % indicated noninferiority. RESULTS: In the modified intent-to-treat population (MEC = 634; HEC = 707), both APF530 doses were noninferior to palonosetron in preventing acute CINV after MEC (CRs 74.8 % [−9.8, 9.3] and 76.9 % [−7.5, 11.4], respectively, vs. 75.0 % palonosetron) and after HEC (CRs 77.7 % [−11.5, 5.5] and 81.3 % [-7.7, 8.7], respectively, vs. 80.7 % palonosetron). APF530 500 mg was noninferior to palonosetron in preventing delayed CINV after MEC (CR 58.5 % [−9.5, 12.1] vs. 57.2 % palonosetron) but not superior in preventing delayed CINV after HEC. Adverse events were generally mild and unrelated to treatment, the most common (excluding injection-site reactions) being constipation. CONCLUSIONS: A single subcutaneous APF530 injection offers a convenient alternative to palonosetron for preventing acute and delayed CINV after MEC or HEC. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014-09-02 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4311069/ /pubmed/25179689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2400-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Raftopoulos, Harry
Cooper, William
O’Boyle, Erin
Gabrail, Nashat
Boccia, Ralph
Gralla, Richard J.
Comparison of an extended-release formulation of granisetron (APF530) versus palonosetron for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy: results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority phase 3 trial
title Comparison of an extended-release formulation of granisetron (APF530) versus palonosetron for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy: results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority phase 3 trial
title_full Comparison of an extended-release formulation of granisetron (APF530) versus palonosetron for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy: results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority phase 3 trial
title_fullStr Comparison of an extended-release formulation of granisetron (APF530) versus palonosetron for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy: results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority phase 3 trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of an extended-release formulation of granisetron (APF530) versus palonosetron for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy: results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority phase 3 trial
title_short Comparison of an extended-release formulation of granisetron (APF530) versus palonosetron for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy: results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority phase 3 trial
title_sort comparison of an extended-release formulation of granisetron (apf530) versus palonosetron for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy: results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority phase 3 trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4311069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25179689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2400-3
work_keys_str_mv AT raftopoulosharry comparisonofanextendedreleaseformulationofgranisetronapf530versuspalonosetronforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingassociatedwithmoderatelyorhighlyemetogenicchemotherapyresultsofaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindnoninferiorityphase3trial
AT cooperwilliam comparisonofanextendedreleaseformulationofgranisetronapf530versuspalonosetronforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingassociatedwithmoderatelyorhighlyemetogenicchemotherapyresultsofaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindnoninferiorityphase3trial
AT oboyleerin comparisonofanextendedreleaseformulationofgranisetronapf530versuspalonosetronforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingassociatedwithmoderatelyorhighlyemetogenicchemotherapyresultsofaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindnoninferiorityphase3trial
AT gabrailnashat comparisonofanextendedreleaseformulationofgranisetronapf530versuspalonosetronforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingassociatedwithmoderatelyorhighlyemetogenicchemotherapyresultsofaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindnoninferiorityphase3trial
AT bocciaralph comparisonofanextendedreleaseformulationofgranisetronapf530versuspalonosetronforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingassociatedwithmoderatelyorhighlyemetogenicchemotherapyresultsofaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindnoninferiorityphase3trial
AT grallarichardj comparisonofanextendedreleaseformulationofgranisetronapf530versuspalonosetronforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingassociatedwithmoderatelyorhighlyemetogenicchemotherapyresultsofaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindnoninferiorityphase3trial