Cargando…

The spinal anti-inflammatory mechanism of motor cortex stimulation: cause of success and refractoriness in neuropathic pain?

BACKGROUND: Motor cortex stimulation (MCS) is an effective treatment in neuropathic pain refractory to pharmacological management. However, analgesia is not satisfactorily obtained in one third of patients. Given the importance of understanding the mechanisms to overcome therapeutic limitations, we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silva, Guilherme D, Lopes, Patrícia SS, Fonoff, Erich T, Pagano, Rosana L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4311417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25600429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12974-014-0216-1
_version_ 1782354989759332352
author Silva, Guilherme D
Lopes, Patrícia SS
Fonoff, Erich T
Pagano, Rosana L
author_facet Silva, Guilherme D
Lopes, Patrícia SS
Fonoff, Erich T
Pagano, Rosana L
author_sort Silva, Guilherme D
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Motor cortex stimulation (MCS) is an effective treatment in neuropathic pain refractory to pharmacological management. However, analgesia is not satisfactorily obtained in one third of patients. Given the importance of understanding the mechanisms to overcome therapeutic limitations, we addressed the question: what mechanisms can explain both MCS effectiveness and refractoriness? Considering the crucial role of spinal neuroimmune activation in neuropathic pain pathophysiology, we hypothesized that modulation of spinal astrocyte and microglia activity is one of the mechanisms of action of MCS. METHODS: Rats with peripheral neuropathy (chronic nerve injury model) underwent MCS and were evaluated with a nociceptive test. Following the test, these animals were divided into two groups: MCS-responsive and MCS-refractory. We also evaluated a group of neuropathic rats not stimulated and a group of sham-operated rats. Some assays included rats with peripheral neuropathy that were treated with AM251 (a cannabinoid antagonist/inverse agonist) or saline before MCS. Finally, we performed immunohistochemical analyses of glial cells (microglia and astrocytes), cytokines (TNF-α and IL-1β), cannabinoid type 2 (CB2), μ-opioid (MOR), and purinergic P2X4 receptors in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord (DHSC). FINDINGS: MCS reversed mechanical hyperalgesia, inhibited astrocyte and microglial activity, decreased proinflammatory cytokine staining, enhanced CB2 staining, and downregulated P2X4 receptors in the DHSC ipsilateral to sciatic injury. Spinal MOR staining was also inhibited upon MCS. Pre-treatment with AM251 blocked the effects of MCS, including the inhibitory mechanism on cells. Finally, MCS-refractory animals showed similar CB2, but higher P2X4 and MOR staining intensity in the DHSC in comparison to MCS-responsive rats. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that MCS induces analgesia through a spinal anti-neuroinflammatory effect and the activation of the cannabinoid and opioid systems via descending inhibitory pathways. As a possible explanation for MCS refractoriness, we propose that CB2 activation is compromised, leading to cannabinoid resistance and consequently to the perpetuation of neuroinflammation and opioid inefficacy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12974-014-0216-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4311417
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43114172015-01-31 The spinal anti-inflammatory mechanism of motor cortex stimulation: cause of success and refractoriness in neuropathic pain? Silva, Guilherme D Lopes, Patrícia SS Fonoff, Erich T Pagano, Rosana L J Neuroinflammation Research BACKGROUND: Motor cortex stimulation (MCS) is an effective treatment in neuropathic pain refractory to pharmacological management. However, analgesia is not satisfactorily obtained in one third of patients. Given the importance of understanding the mechanisms to overcome therapeutic limitations, we addressed the question: what mechanisms can explain both MCS effectiveness and refractoriness? Considering the crucial role of spinal neuroimmune activation in neuropathic pain pathophysiology, we hypothesized that modulation of spinal astrocyte and microglia activity is one of the mechanisms of action of MCS. METHODS: Rats with peripheral neuropathy (chronic nerve injury model) underwent MCS and were evaluated with a nociceptive test. Following the test, these animals were divided into two groups: MCS-responsive and MCS-refractory. We also evaluated a group of neuropathic rats not stimulated and a group of sham-operated rats. Some assays included rats with peripheral neuropathy that were treated with AM251 (a cannabinoid antagonist/inverse agonist) or saline before MCS. Finally, we performed immunohistochemical analyses of glial cells (microglia and astrocytes), cytokines (TNF-α and IL-1β), cannabinoid type 2 (CB2), μ-opioid (MOR), and purinergic P2X4 receptors in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord (DHSC). FINDINGS: MCS reversed mechanical hyperalgesia, inhibited astrocyte and microglial activity, decreased proinflammatory cytokine staining, enhanced CB2 staining, and downregulated P2X4 receptors in the DHSC ipsilateral to sciatic injury. Spinal MOR staining was also inhibited upon MCS. Pre-treatment with AM251 blocked the effects of MCS, including the inhibitory mechanism on cells. Finally, MCS-refractory animals showed similar CB2, but higher P2X4 and MOR staining intensity in the DHSC in comparison to MCS-responsive rats. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that MCS induces analgesia through a spinal anti-neuroinflammatory effect and the activation of the cannabinoid and opioid systems via descending inhibitory pathways. As a possible explanation for MCS refractoriness, we propose that CB2 activation is compromised, leading to cannabinoid resistance and consequently to the perpetuation of neuroinflammation and opioid inefficacy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12974-014-0216-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4311417/ /pubmed/25600429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12974-014-0216-1 Text en © Silva et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Silva, Guilherme D
Lopes, Patrícia SS
Fonoff, Erich T
Pagano, Rosana L
The spinal anti-inflammatory mechanism of motor cortex stimulation: cause of success and refractoriness in neuropathic pain?
title The spinal anti-inflammatory mechanism of motor cortex stimulation: cause of success and refractoriness in neuropathic pain?
title_full The spinal anti-inflammatory mechanism of motor cortex stimulation: cause of success and refractoriness in neuropathic pain?
title_fullStr The spinal anti-inflammatory mechanism of motor cortex stimulation: cause of success and refractoriness in neuropathic pain?
title_full_unstemmed The spinal anti-inflammatory mechanism of motor cortex stimulation: cause of success and refractoriness in neuropathic pain?
title_short The spinal anti-inflammatory mechanism of motor cortex stimulation: cause of success and refractoriness in neuropathic pain?
title_sort spinal anti-inflammatory mechanism of motor cortex stimulation: cause of success and refractoriness in neuropathic pain?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4311417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25600429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12974-014-0216-1
work_keys_str_mv AT silvaguilhermed thespinalantiinflammatorymechanismofmotorcortexstimulationcauseofsuccessandrefractorinessinneuropathicpain
AT lopespatriciass thespinalantiinflammatorymechanismofmotorcortexstimulationcauseofsuccessandrefractorinessinneuropathicpain
AT fonoffericht thespinalantiinflammatorymechanismofmotorcortexstimulationcauseofsuccessandrefractorinessinneuropathicpain
AT paganorosanal thespinalantiinflammatorymechanismofmotorcortexstimulationcauseofsuccessandrefractorinessinneuropathicpain
AT silvaguilhermed spinalantiinflammatorymechanismofmotorcortexstimulationcauseofsuccessandrefractorinessinneuropathicpain
AT lopespatriciass spinalantiinflammatorymechanismofmotorcortexstimulationcauseofsuccessandrefractorinessinneuropathicpain
AT fonoffericht spinalantiinflammatorymechanismofmotorcortexstimulationcauseofsuccessandrefractorinessinneuropathicpain
AT paganorosanal spinalantiinflammatorymechanismofmotorcortexstimulationcauseofsuccessandrefractorinessinneuropathicpain