Cargando…

Quality assurance for the EORTC 22071–26071 study: dummy run prospective analysis

PURPOSE: The phase III 22071–26071 trial was designed to evaluate the addition of panitumumab to adjuvant chemotherapy plus intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in locally advanced resected squamous cell head and neck cancer. We report the results of the dummy run (DR) performed to detect deviati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fairchild, Alysa, Langendijk, Johannes A, Nuyts, Sandra, Scrase, Christopher, Tomsej, Milan, Schuring, Danny, Gulyban, Akos, Ghosh, Sunita, Weber, Damien C, Budach, Wilfried
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4311463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25424399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-014-0248-9
_version_ 1782355000818663424
author Fairchild, Alysa
Langendijk, Johannes A
Nuyts, Sandra
Scrase, Christopher
Tomsej, Milan
Schuring, Danny
Gulyban, Akos
Ghosh, Sunita
Weber, Damien C
Budach, Wilfried
author_facet Fairchild, Alysa
Langendijk, Johannes A
Nuyts, Sandra
Scrase, Christopher
Tomsej, Milan
Schuring, Danny
Gulyban, Akos
Ghosh, Sunita
Weber, Damien C
Budach, Wilfried
author_sort Fairchild, Alysa
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The phase III 22071–26071 trial was designed to evaluate the addition of panitumumab to adjuvant chemotherapy plus intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in locally advanced resected squamous cell head and neck cancer. We report the results of the dummy run (DR) performed to detect deviations from protocol guidelines. METHODS AND MATERIALS: DR datasets consisting of target volumes, organs at risk (OAR) and treatment plans were digitally uploaded, then compared with reference contours and protocol guidelines by six central reviewers. Summary statistics and analyses of potential correlations between delineations and plan characteristics were performed. RESULTS: Of 23 datasets, 20 (87.0%) GTVs were evaluated as acceptable/borderline, along with 13 (56.5%) CTVs and 10 (43.5%) PTVs. All PTV dose requirements were met by 73.9% of cases. Dose constraints were met for 65.2-100% of mandatory OARs. Statistically significant correlations were observed between the subjective acceptability of contours and the ability to meet dose constraints for all OARs (p ≤ 0.01) except for the parotids and spinal cord. Ipsilateral parotid doses correlated significantly with CTV and PTV volumes (p ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The observed wide variations in treatment planning, despite strict guidelines, confirms the complexity of development and quality assurance of IMRT-based multicentre studies for head and neck cancer. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13014-014-0248-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4311463
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43114632015-01-31 Quality assurance for the EORTC 22071–26071 study: dummy run prospective analysis Fairchild, Alysa Langendijk, Johannes A Nuyts, Sandra Scrase, Christopher Tomsej, Milan Schuring, Danny Gulyban, Akos Ghosh, Sunita Weber, Damien C Budach, Wilfried Radiat Oncol Research PURPOSE: The phase III 22071–26071 trial was designed to evaluate the addition of panitumumab to adjuvant chemotherapy plus intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in locally advanced resected squamous cell head and neck cancer. We report the results of the dummy run (DR) performed to detect deviations from protocol guidelines. METHODS AND MATERIALS: DR datasets consisting of target volumes, organs at risk (OAR) and treatment plans were digitally uploaded, then compared with reference contours and protocol guidelines by six central reviewers. Summary statistics and analyses of potential correlations between delineations and plan characteristics were performed. RESULTS: Of 23 datasets, 20 (87.0%) GTVs were evaluated as acceptable/borderline, along with 13 (56.5%) CTVs and 10 (43.5%) PTVs. All PTV dose requirements were met by 73.9% of cases. Dose constraints were met for 65.2-100% of mandatory OARs. Statistically significant correlations were observed between the subjective acceptability of contours and the ability to meet dose constraints for all OARs (p ≤ 0.01) except for the parotids and spinal cord. Ipsilateral parotid doses correlated significantly with CTV and PTV volumes (p ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The observed wide variations in treatment planning, despite strict guidelines, confirms the complexity of development and quality assurance of IMRT-based multicentre studies for head and neck cancer. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13014-014-0248-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4311463/ /pubmed/25424399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-014-0248-9 Text en © Fairchild et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Fairchild, Alysa
Langendijk, Johannes A
Nuyts, Sandra
Scrase, Christopher
Tomsej, Milan
Schuring, Danny
Gulyban, Akos
Ghosh, Sunita
Weber, Damien C
Budach, Wilfried
Quality assurance for the EORTC 22071–26071 study: dummy run prospective analysis
title Quality assurance for the EORTC 22071–26071 study: dummy run prospective analysis
title_full Quality assurance for the EORTC 22071–26071 study: dummy run prospective analysis
title_fullStr Quality assurance for the EORTC 22071–26071 study: dummy run prospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Quality assurance for the EORTC 22071–26071 study: dummy run prospective analysis
title_short Quality assurance for the EORTC 22071–26071 study: dummy run prospective analysis
title_sort quality assurance for the eortc 22071–26071 study: dummy run prospective analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4311463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25424399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-014-0248-9
work_keys_str_mv AT fairchildalysa qualityassurancefortheeortc2207126071studydummyrunprospectiveanalysis
AT langendijkjohannesa qualityassurancefortheeortc2207126071studydummyrunprospectiveanalysis
AT nuytssandra qualityassurancefortheeortc2207126071studydummyrunprospectiveanalysis
AT scrasechristopher qualityassurancefortheeortc2207126071studydummyrunprospectiveanalysis
AT tomsejmilan qualityassurancefortheeortc2207126071studydummyrunprospectiveanalysis
AT schuringdanny qualityassurancefortheeortc2207126071studydummyrunprospectiveanalysis
AT gulybanakos qualityassurancefortheeortc2207126071studydummyrunprospectiveanalysis
AT ghoshsunita qualityassurancefortheeortc2207126071studydummyrunprospectiveanalysis
AT weberdamienc qualityassurancefortheeortc2207126071studydummyrunprospectiveanalysis
AT budachwilfried qualityassurancefortheeortc2207126071studydummyrunprospectiveanalysis