Cargando…
Single bolus versus split dose gadolinium administration in extra-cellular volume calculation at 3 Tesla
BACKGROUND: Diffuse myocardial fibrosis may be quantified with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) by calculating extra-cellular volume (ECV) from native and post-contrast T1 values. Accurate ECV calculation is dependent upon the contrast agent having reached equilibrium within tissue compartmen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4311469/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25638228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-015-0112-6 |
_version_ | 1782355002243678208 |
---|---|
author | McDiarmid, Adam K Swoboda, Peter P Erhayiem, Bara Ripley, David P Kidambi, Ananth Broadbent, David A Higgins, David M Greenwood, John P Plein, Sven |
author_facet | McDiarmid, Adam K Swoboda, Peter P Erhayiem, Bara Ripley, David P Kidambi, Ananth Broadbent, David A Higgins, David M Greenwood, John P Plein, Sven |
author_sort | McDiarmid, Adam K |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Diffuse myocardial fibrosis may be quantified with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) by calculating extra-cellular volume (ECV) from native and post-contrast T1 values. Accurate ECV calculation is dependent upon the contrast agent having reached equilibrium within tissue compartments. Previous studies have used infusion or single bolus injections of contrast to calculate ECV. In clinical practice however, split dose contrast injection is commonly used as part of stress/rest perfusion studies. In this study we sought to assess the effects of split dose versus single bolus contrast administration on ECV calculation. METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers and five patients ( 4 ischaemic heart disease, 1 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy) were studied on a 3.0 Tesla (Philips Achieva TX) MR system and underwent two (patients) or three (volunteers) separate CMR studies over a mean of 12 and 30 days respectively. Volunteers underwent one single bolus contrast study (Gadovist 0.15mmol/kg). In two further studies, contrast was given in two boluses (0.075mmol/kg per bolus) as part of a clinical adenosine stress/rest perfusion protocol, boluses were separated by 12 minutes. Patients underwent one bolus and one stress perfusion study only. T1 maps were acquired pre contrast and 15 minutes following the single bolus or second contrast injection. RESULTS: ECV agreed between bolus and split dose contrast administration (coefficient of variability 5.04%, bias 0.009, 95% CI −3.754 to 3.772, r(2) = 0.973, p = 0.001)). Inter-study agreement with split dose administration was good (coefficient of variability, 5.67%, bias −0.018, 95% CI −4.045 to 4.009, r(2) = 0.766, p > 0.001). CONCLUSION: ECV quantification using split dose contrast administration is reproducible and agrees well with previously validated methods in healthy volunteers, as well as abnormal and remote myocardium in patients. This suggests that clinical perfusion CMR studies may incorporate assessment of tissue composition by ECV based on T1 mapping. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4311469 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43114692015-02-03 Single bolus versus split dose gadolinium administration in extra-cellular volume calculation at 3 Tesla McDiarmid, Adam K Swoboda, Peter P Erhayiem, Bara Ripley, David P Kidambi, Ananth Broadbent, David A Higgins, David M Greenwood, John P Plein, Sven J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Diffuse myocardial fibrosis may be quantified with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) by calculating extra-cellular volume (ECV) from native and post-contrast T1 values. Accurate ECV calculation is dependent upon the contrast agent having reached equilibrium within tissue compartments. Previous studies have used infusion or single bolus injections of contrast to calculate ECV. In clinical practice however, split dose contrast injection is commonly used as part of stress/rest perfusion studies. In this study we sought to assess the effects of split dose versus single bolus contrast administration on ECV calculation. METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers and five patients ( 4 ischaemic heart disease, 1 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy) were studied on a 3.0 Tesla (Philips Achieva TX) MR system and underwent two (patients) or three (volunteers) separate CMR studies over a mean of 12 and 30 days respectively. Volunteers underwent one single bolus contrast study (Gadovist 0.15mmol/kg). In two further studies, contrast was given in two boluses (0.075mmol/kg per bolus) as part of a clinical adenosine stress/rest perfusion protocol, boluses were separated by 12 minutes. Patients underwent one bolus and one stress perfusion study only. T1 maps were acquired pre contrast and 15 minutes following the single bolus or second contrast injection. RESULTS: ECV agreed between bolus and split dose contrast administration (coefficient of variability 5.04%, bias 0.009, 95% CI −3.754 to 3.772, r(2) = 0.973, p = 0.001)). Inter-study agreement with split dose administration was good (coefficient of variability, 5.67%, bias −0.018, 95% CI −4.045 to 4.009, r(2) = 0.766, p > 0.001). CONCLUSION: ECV quantification using split dose contrast administration is reproducible and agrees well with previously validated methods in healthy volunteers, as well as abnormal and remote myocardium in patients. This suggests that clinical perfusion CMR studies may incorporate assessment of tissue composition by ECV based on T1 mapping. BioMed Central 2015-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4311469/ /pubmed/25638228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-015-0112-6 Text en © McDiarmid et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research McDiarmid, Adam K Swoboda, Peter P Erhayiem, Bara Ripley, David P Kidambi, Ananth Broadbent, David A Higgins, David M Greenwood, John P Plein, Sven Single bolus versus split dose gadolinium administration in extra-cellular volume calculation at 3 Tesla |
title | Single bolus versus split dose gadolinium administration in extra-cellular volume calculation at 3 Tesla |
title_full | Single bolus versus split dose gadolinium administration in extra-cellular volume calculation at 3 Tesla |
title_fullStr | Single bolus versus split dose gadolinium administration in extra-cellular volume calculation at 3 Tesla |
title_full_unstemmed | Single bolus versus split dose gadolinium administration in extra-cellular volume calculation at 3 Tesla |
title_short | Single bolus versus split dose gadolinium administration in extra-cellular volume calculation at 3 Tesla |
title_sort | single bolus versus split dose gadolinium administration in extra-cellular volume calculation at 3 tesla |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4311469/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25638228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-015-0112-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcdiarmidadamk singlebolusversussplitdosegadoliniumadministrationinextracellularvolumecalculationat3tesla AT swobodapeterp singlebolusversussplitdosegadoliniumadministrationinextracellularvolumecalculationat3tesla AT erhayiembara singlebolusversussplitdosegadoliniumadministrationinextracellularvolumecalculationat3tesla AT ripleydavidp singlebolusversussplitdosegadoliniumadministrationinextracellularvolumecalculationat3tesla AT kidambiananth singlebolusversussplitdosegadoliniumadministrationinextracellularvolumecalculationat3tesla AT broadbentdavida singlebolusversussplitdosegadoliniumadministrationinextracellularvolumecalculationat3tesla AT higginsdavidm singlebolusversussplitdosegadoliniumadministrationinextracellularvolumecalculationat3tesla AT greenwoodjohnp singlebolusversussplitdosegadoliniumadministrationinextracellularvolumecalculationat3tesla AT pleinsven singlebolusversussplitdosegadoliniumadministrationinextracellularvolumecalculationat3tesla |