Cargando…

Accuracy of electronic apex locators to detect root canal perforations with inserted metallic posts: an ex vivo study

INTRODUCTION: The detection of possible root canal perforations caused during a metal post placement is frequently difficult to diagnose. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of apex locators to diagnose such perforations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty mesiolingual root canals of ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marroquín, Benjamín Briseño, Fernández, Claudia Cortazar, Schmidtmann, Irene, Willershausen, Brita, Goldberg, Fernando
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4311483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25533476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13005-014-0057-2
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: The detection of possible root canal perforations caused during a metal post placement is frequently difficult to diagnose. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of apex locators to diagnose such perforations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty mesiolingual root canals of extracted mandibular molars were instrumented (30/.04) and a post space was prepared. A root canal perforation was intentionally made at the bi-furcation (n = 15). Metal posts were cemented in 15 perforated and 15 non-perforated root canals. The teeth roots were embedded in an agar-agar solution. The resulting measurements (“short” or “beyond” the apex) disclosed if a perforation could be identified with five different apex locators (ProPex II, Elements Apex Locator, Apex NRG, Raypex 5 and Raypex 6). The sensitivity and specificity (95% interval confidence) were calculated. RESULTS: All devices excluded the absence of perforations (100% with 95% confidence interval [78%; 100%] specificity). The Apex NRG and Raypex 6 detected all perforations (100% with 95% confidence interval [78%; 100%] sensitivity). The ProPex II, Elements Apex Locator, and Raypex 5 detected 14 out of 15 perforations (93% with 95% confidence interval [68%; 100%] sensitivity). CONCLUSIONS: All devices determined root canal perforations, due to metallic posts, within clinical acceptable ranges.