Cargando…
Differentiations of Chitin Content and Surface Morphologies of Chitins Extracted from Male and Female Grasshopper Species
In this study, we used Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), elemental analysis (EA), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), X-ray diffractometry (XRD), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to investigate chitin structure isolated from both sexes of four grasshopper species. FT-IR, EA, XRD,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4312026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25635814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115531 |
_version_ | 1782355079895973888 |
---|---|
author | Kaya, Murat Lelešius, Evaldas Nagrockaitė, Radvilė Sargin, Idris Arslan, Gulsin Mol, Abbas Baran, Talat Can, Esra Bitim, Betul |
author_facet | Kaya, Murat Lelešius, Evaldas Nagrockaitė, Radvilė Sargin, Idris Arslan, Gulsin Mol, Abbas Baran, Talat Can, Esra Bitim, Betul |
author_sort | Kaya, Murat |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this study, we used Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), elemental analysis (EA), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), X-ray diffractometry (XRD), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to investigate chitin structure isolated from both sexes of four grasshopper species. FT-IR, EA, XRD, and TGA showed that the chitin was in the alpha form. With respect to gender, two main differences were observed. First, we observed that the quantity of chitin was greater in males than in females and the dry weight of chitin between species ranged from 4.71% to 11.84%. Second, using SEM, we observed that the male chitin surface structure contained 25 – 90nm wide nanofibers and 90 – 250 nm nanopores, while no pores or nanofibers were observed in the chitin surface structure of the majority of females (nanofibers were observed only in M. desertus females). In contrast, the elemental analysis, thermal properties, and crystalline index values for chitin were similar in males and females. Also, we carried out enzymatic digestion of the isolated chitins using commercial chitinase from Streptomyces griseus. We observed that there were no big differences in digestion rate of the chitins from both sexes and commercial chitin. The digestion rates were for grasshoppers’ chitins; 88.45–95.48% and for commercial chitin; 94.95%. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4312026 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43120262015-02-13 Differentiations of Chitin Content and Surface Morphologies of Chitins Extracted from Male and Female Grasshopper Species Kaya, Murat Lelešius, Evaldas Nagrockaitė, Radvilė Sargin, Idris Arslan, Gulsin Mol, Abbas Baran, Talat Can, Esra Bitim, Betul PLoS One Research Article In this study, we used Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), elemental analysis (EA), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), X-ray diffractometry (XRD), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to investigate chitin structure isolated from both sexes of four grasshopper species. FT-IR, EA, XRD, and TGA showed that the chitin was in the alpha form. With respect to gender, two main differences were observed. First, we observed that the quantity of chitin was greater in males than in females and the dry weight of chitin between species ranged from 4.71% to 11.84%. Second, using SEM, we observed that the male chitin surface structure contained 25 – 90nm wide nanofibers and 90 – 250 nm nanopores, while no pores or nanofibers were observed in the chitin surface structure of the majority of females (nanofibers were observed only in M. desertus females). In contrast, the elemental analysis, thermal properties, and crystalline index values for chitin were similar in males and females. Also, we carried out enzymatic digestion of the isolated chitins using commercial chitinase from Streptomyces griseus. We observed that there were no big differences in digestion rate of the chitins from both sexes and commercial chitin. The digestion rates were for grasshoppers’ chitins; 88.45–95.48% and for commercial chitin; 94.95%. Public Library of Science 2015-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4312026/ /pubmed/25635814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115531 Text en © 2015 Kaya et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kaya, Murat Lelešius, Evaldas Nagrockaitė, Radvilė Sargin, Idris Arslan, Gulsin Mol, Abbas Baran, Talat Can, Esra Bitim, Betul Differentiations of Chitin Content and Surface Morphologies of Chitins Extracted from Male and Female Grasshopper Species |
title | Differentiations of Chitin Content and Surface Morphologies of Chitins Extracted from Male and Female Grasshopper Species |
title_full | Differentiations of Chitin Content and Surface Morphologies of Chitins Extracted from Male and Female Grasshopper Species |
title_fullStr | Differentiations of Chitin Content and Surface Morphologies of Chitins Extracted from Male and Female Grasshopper Species |
title_full_unstemmed | Differentiations of Chitin Content and Surface Morphologies of Chitins Extracted from Male and Female Grasshopper Species |
title_short | Differentiations of Chitin Content and Surface Morphologies of Chitins Extracted from Male and Female Grasshopper Species |
title_sort | differentiations of chitin content and surface morphologies of chitins extracted from male and female grasshopper species |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4312026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25635814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115531 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kayamurat differentiationsofchitincontentandsurfacemorphologiesofchitinsextractedfrommaleandfemalegrasshopperspecies AT lelesiusevaldas differentiationsofchitincontentandsurfacemorphologiesofchitinsextractedfrommaleandfemalegrasshopperspecies AT nagrockaiteradvile differentiationsofchitincontentandsurfacemorphologiesofchitinsextractedfrommaleandfemalegrasshopperspecies AT sarginidris differentiationsofchitincontentandsurfacemorphologiesofchitinsextractedfrommaleandfemalegrasshopperspecies AT arslangulsin differentiationsofchitincontentandsurfacemorphologiesofchitinsextractedfrommaleandfemalegrasshopperspecies AT molabbas differentiationsofchitincontentandsurfacemorphologiesofchitinsextractedfrommaleandfemalegrasshopperspecies AT barantalat differentiationsofchitincontentandsurfacemorphologiesofchitinsextractedfrommaleandfemalegrasshopperspecies AT canesra differentiationsofchitincontentandsurfacemorphologiesofchitinsextractedfrommaleandfemalegrasshopperspecies AT bitimbetul differentiationsofchitincontentandsurfacemorphologiesofchitinsextractedfrommaleandfemalegrasshopperspecies |