Cargando…

Differentiations of Chitin Content and Surface Morphologies of Chitins Extracted from Male and Female Grasshopper Species

In this study, we used Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), elemental analysis (EA), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), X-ray diffractometry (XRD), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to investigate chitin structure isolated from both sexes of four grasshopper species. FT-IR, EA, XRD,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaya, Murat, Lelešius, Evaldas, Nagrockaitė, Radvilė, Sargin, Idris, Arslan, Gulsin, Mol, Abbas, Baran, Talat, Can, Esra, Bitim, Betul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4312026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25635814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115531
_version_ 1782355079895973888
author Kaya, Murat
Lelešius, Evaldas
Nagrockaitė, Radvilė
Sargin, Idris
Arslan, Gulsin
Mol, Abbas
Baran, Talat
Can, Esra
Bitim, Betul
author_facet Kaya, Murat
Lelešius, Evaldas
Nagrockaitė, Radvilė
Sargin, Idris
Arslan, Gulsin
Mol, Abbas
Baran, Talat
Can, Esra
Bitim, Betul
author_sort Kaya, Murat
collection PubMed
description In this study, we used Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), elemental analysis (EA), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), X-ray diffractometry (XRD), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to investigate chitin structure isolated from both sexes of four grasshopper species. FT-IR, EA, XRD, and TGA showed that the chitin was in the alpha form. With respect to gender, two main differences were observed. First, we observed that the quantity of chitin was greater in males than in females and the dry weight of chitin between species ranged from 4.71% to 11.84%. Second, using SEM, we observed that the male chitin surface structure contained 25 – 90nm wide nanofibers and 90 – 250 nm nanopores, while no pores or nanofibers were observed in the chitin surface structure of the majority of females (nanofibers were observed only in M. desertus females). In contrast, the elemental analysis, thermal properties, and crystalline index values for chitin were similar in males and females. Also, we carried out enzymatic digestion of the isolated chitins using commercial chitinase from Streptomyces griseus. We observed that there were no big differences in digestion rate of the chitins from both sexes and commercial chitin. The digestion rates were for grasshoppers’ chitins; 88.45–95.48% and for commercial chitin; 94.95%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4312026
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43120262015-02-13 Differentiations of Chitin Content and Surface Morphologies of Chitins Extracted from Male and Female Grasshopper Species Kaya, Murat Lelešius, Evaldas Nagrockaitė, Radvilė Sargin, Idris Arslan, Gulsin Mol, Abbas Baran, Talat Can, Esra Bitim, Betul PLoS One Research Article In this study, we used Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), elemental analysis (EA), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), X-ray diffractometry (XRD), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to investigate chitin structure isolated from both sexes of four grasshopper species. FT-IR, EA, XRD, and TGA showed that the chitin was in the alpha form. With respect to gender, two main differences were observed. First, we observed that the quantity of chitin was greater in males than in females and the dry weight of chitin between species ranged from 4.71% to 11.84%. Second, using SEM, we observed that the male chitin surface structure contained 25 – 90nm wide nanofibers and 90 – 250 nm nanopores, while no pores or nanofibers were observed in the chitin surface structure of the majority of females (nanofibers were observed only in M. desertus females). In contrast, the elemental analysis, thermal properties, and crystalline index values for chitin were similar in males and females. Also, we carried out enzymatic digestion of the isolated chitins using commercial chitinase from Streptomyces griseus. We observed that there were no big differences in digestion rate of the chitins from both sexes and commercial chitin. The digestion rates were for grasshoppers’ chitins; 88.45–95.48% and for commercial chitin; 94.95%. Public Library of Science 2015-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4312026/ /pubmed/25635814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115531 Text en © 2015 Kaya et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kaya, Murat
Lelešius, Evaldas
Nagrockaitė, Radvilė
Sargin, Idris
Arslan, Gulsin
Mol, Abbas
Baran, Talat
Can, Esra
Bitim, Betul
Differentiations of Chitin Content and Surface Morphologies of Chitins Extracted from Male and Female Grasshopper Species
title Differentiations of Chitin Content and Surface Morphologies of Chitins Extracted from Male and Female Grasshopper Species
title_full Differentiations of Chitin Content and Surface Morphologies of Chitins Extracted from Male and Female Grasshopper Species
title_fullStr Differentiations of Chitin Content and Surface Morphologies of Chitins Extracted from Male and Female Grasshopper Species
title_full_unstemmed Differentiations of Chitin Content and Surface Morphologies of Chitins Extracted from Male and Female Grasshopper Species
title_short Differentiations of Chitin Content and Surface Morphologies of Chitins Extracted from Male and Female Grasshopper Species
title_sort differentiations of chitin content and surface morphologies of chitins extracted from male and female grasshopper species
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4312026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25635814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115531
work_keys_str_mv AT kayamurat differentiationsofchitincontentandsurfacemorphologiesofchitinsextractedfrommaleandfemalegrasshopperspecies
AT lelesiusevaldas differentiationsofchitincontentandsurfacemorphologiesofchitinsextractedfrommaleandfemalegrasshopperspecies
AT nagrockaiteradvile differentiationsofchitincontentandsurfacemorphologiesofchitinsextractedfrommaleandfemalegrasshopperspecies
AT sarginidris differentiationsofchitincontentandsurfacemorphologiesofchitinsextractedfrommaleandfemalegrasshopperspecies
AT arslangulsin differentiationsofchitincontentandsurfacemorphologiesofchitinsextractedfrommaleandfemalegrasshopperspecies
AT molabbas differentiationsofchitincontentandsurfacemorphologiesofchitinsextractedfrommaleandfemalegrasshopperspecies
AT barantalat differentiationsofchitincontentandsurfacemorphologiesofchitinsextractedfrommaleandfemalegrasshopperspecies
AT canesra differentiationsofchitincontentandsurfacemorphologiesofchitinsextractedfrommaleandfemalegrasshopperspecies
AT bitimbetul differentiationsofchitincontentandsurfacemorphologiesofchitinsextractedfrommaleandfemalegrasshopperspecies