Cargando…

Extended score interval in the assessment of basic surgical skills

INTRODUCTION: The Basic Surgical Skills course uses an assessment score interval of 0–3. An extended score interval, 1–6, was proposed by the Swedish steering committee of the course. The aim of this study was to analyze the trainee scores in the current 0–3 scored version compared to a proposed 1–6...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Acosta, Stefan, Sevonius, Dan, Beckman, Anders
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Co-Action Publishing 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4312359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25636607
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v20.25819
_version_ 1782355108802068480
author Acosta, Stefan
Sevonius, Dan
Beckman, Anders
author_facet Acosta, Stefan
Sevonius, Dan
Beckman, Anders
author_sort Acosta, Stefan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Basic Surgical Skills course uses an assessment score interval of 0–3. An extended score interval, 1–6, was proposed by the Swedish steering committee of the course. The aim of this study was to analyze the trainee scores in the current 0–3 scored version compared to a proposed 1–6 scored version. METHODS: Sixteen participants, seven females and nine males, were evaluated in the current and proposed assessment forms by instructors, observers, and learners themselves during the first and second day. In each assessment form, 17 tasks were assessed. The inter-rater reliability between the current and the proposed score sheets were evaluated with intraclass correlation (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: The distribution of scores for ‘knot tying’ at the last time point and ‘bowel anastomosis side to side’ given by the instructors in the current assessment form showed that the highest score was given in 31 and 62%, respectively. No ceiling effects were found in the proposed assessment form. The overall ICC between the current and proposed score sheets after assessment by the instructors increased from 0.38 (95% CI 0.77–0.78) on Day 1 to 0.83 (95% CI 0.51–0.94) on Day 2. DISCUSSION: A clear ceiling effect of scores was demonstrated in the current assessment form, questioning its validity. The proposed score sheet provides more accurate scores and seems to be a better feedback instrument for learning technical surgical skills in the Basic Surgical Skills course.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4312359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Co-Action Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43123592015-02-18 Extended score interval in the assessment of basic surgical skills Acosta, Stefan Sevonius, Dan Beckman, Anders Med Educ Online Performance Assessment INTRODUCTION: The Basic Surgical Skills course uses an assessment score interval of 0–3. An extended score interval, 1–6, was proposed by the Swedish steering committee of the course. The aim of this study was to analyze the trainee scores in the current 0–3 scored version compared to a proposed 1–6 scored version. METHODS: Sixteen participants, seven females and nine males, were evaluated in the current and proposed assessment forms by instructors, observers, and learners themselves during the first and second day. In each assessment form, 17 tasks were assessed. The inter-rater reliability between the current and the proposed score sheets were evaluated with intraclass correlation (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: The distribution of scores for ‘knot tying’ at the last time point and ‘bowel anastomosis side to side’ given by the instructors in the current assessment form showed that the highest score was given in 31 and 62%, respectively. No ceiling effects were found in the proposed assessment form. The overall ICC between the current and proposed score sheets after assessment by the instructors increased from 0.38 (95% CI 0.77–0.78) on Day 1 to 0.83 (95% CI 0.51–0.94) on Day 2. DISCUSSION: A clear ceiling effect of scores was demonstrated in the current assessment form, questioning its validity. The proposed score sheet provides more accurate scores and seems to be a better feedback instrument for learning technical surgical skills in the Basic Surgical Skills course. Co-Action Publishing 2015-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4312359/ /pubmed/25636607 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v20.25819 Text en © 2015 Stefan Acosta et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Performance Assessment
Acosta, Stefan
Sevonius, Dan
Beckman, Anders
Extended score interval in the assessment of basic surgical skills
title Extended score interval in the assessment of basic surgical skills
title_full Extended score interval in the assessment of basic surgical skills
title_fullStr Extended score interval in the assessment of basic surgical skills
title_full_unstemmed Extended score interval in the assessment of basic surgical skills
title_short Extended score interval in the assessment of basic surgical skills
title_sort extended score interval in the assessment of basic surgical skills
topic Performance Assessment
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4312359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25636607
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/meo.v20.25819
work_keys_str_mv AT acostastefan extendedscoreintervalintheassessmentofbasicsurgicalskills
AT sevoniusdan extendedscoreintervalintheassessmentofbasicsurgicalskills
AT beckmananders extendedscoreintervalintheassessmentofbasicsurgicalskills
AT extendedscoreintervalintheassessmentofbasicsurgicalskills