Cargando…

Suboptimal compliance with surgical safety checklists in Colorado: A prospective observational study reveals differences between surgical specialties

BACKGROUND: Surgical safety checklists (SSCs) are designed to improve team communication and consistency in care, ultimately avoiding complications. In Colorado, hospitals reported that use of SSCs was standard practice, but a statewide survey indicated that SSC use was inconsistent. The purpose of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biffl, Walter L, Gallagher, Annalee W, Pieracci, Fredric M, Berumen, Crystal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4312457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25642287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-014-0056-z
_version_ 1782355123730644992
author Biffl, Walter L
Gallagher, Annalee W
Pieracci, Fredric M
Berumen, Crystal
author_facet Biffl, Walter L
Gallagher, Annalee W
Pieracci, Fredric M
Berumen, Crystal
author_sort Biffl, Walter L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surgical safety checklists (SSCs) are designed to improve team communication and consistency in care, ultimately avoiding complications. In Colorado, hospitals reported that use of SSCs was standard practice, but a statewide survey indicated that SSC use was inconsistent. The purpose of this project was to directly observe the compliance with the SSC in Colorado hospitals, through direct observation of the perioperative checklist process. METHODS: Ten hospitals participated in a quality improvement initiative. Trained team members recorded compliance with each of the components of the SSC. Data analysis was performed using a chi-squared test or ANOVA, depending on the number of categorical variables, with p < 0.05 determining statistical significance. RESULTS: Ten hospitals representing statewide diversity submitted 854 observations (median 98, range 24–106). 83% of cases were elective, 13% urgent, and 4% emergent/trauma. There was significant variation across hospitals in: team introductions, cessation of activity, affirming correct procedure, assessing hypothermia risk, need for beta blocker, or VTE prophylaxis. Uniformly poor compliance was observed with respect to assessment of case duration, blood loss, anesthesiologists’ concerns, or display of essential imaging. Only 71% of observers reported active participation by physicians; 9% reported that “the majority did not pay attention” and 4% reported that the team was “just going through the motions”. There were significant differences among surgical specialty groups in the majority of the elements. CONCLUSION: SSCs have been implemented by the vast majority of hospitals in our state; however, compliance with SSC completion in the operating room has wide variation and is generally suboptimal. Although this study was not designed to correlate SSC compliance with outcomes, there are concerns about the risk of a sentinel event or unanticipated complication resulting from poor preparation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4312457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43124572015-02-01 Suboptimal compliance with surgical safety checklists in Colorado: A prospective observational study reveals differences between surgical specialties Biffl, Walter L Gallagher, Annalee W Pieracci, Fredric M Berumen, Crystal Patient Saf Surg Research BACKGROUND: Surgical safety checklists (SSCs) are designed to improve team communication and consistency in care, ultimately avoiding complications. In Colorado, hospitals reported that use of SSCs was standard practice, but a statewide survey indicated that SSC use was inconsistent. The purpose of this project was to directly observe the compliance with the SSC in Colorado hospitals, through direct observation of the perioperative checklist process. METHODS: Ten hospitals participated in a quality improvement initiative. Trained team members recorded compliance with each of the components of the SSC. Data analysis was performed using a chi-squared test or ANOVA, depending on the number of categorical variables, with p < 0.05 determining statistical significance. RESULTS: Ten hospitals representing statewide diversity submitted 854 observations (median 98, range 24–106). 83% of cases were elective, 13% urgent, and 4% emergent/trauma. There was significant variation across hospitals in: team introductions, cessation of activity, affirming correct procedure, assessing hypothermia risk, need for beta blocker, or VTE prophylaxis. Uniformly poor compliance was observed with respect to assessment of case duration, blood loss, anesthesiologists’ concerns, or display of essential imaging. Only 71% of observers reported active participation by physicians; 9% reported that “the majority did not pay attention” and 4% reported that the team was “just going through the motions”. There were significant differences among surgical specialty groups in the majority of the elements. CONCLUSION: SSCs have been implemented by the vast majority of hospitals in our state; however, compliance with SSC completion in the operating room has wide variation and is generally suboptimal. Although this study was not designed to correlate SSC compliance with outcomes, there are concerns about the risk of a sentinel event or unanticipated complication resulting from poor preparation. BioMed Central 2015-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4312457/ /pubmed/25642287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-014-0056-z Text en © Biffl et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Biffl, Walter L
Gallagher, Annalee W
Pieracci, Fredric M
Berumen, Crystal
Suboptimal compliance with surgical safety checklists in Colorado: A prospective observational study reveals differences between surgical specialties
title Suboptimal compliance with surgical safety checklists in Colorado: A prospective observational study reveals differences between surgical specialties
title_full Suboptimal compliance with surgical safety checklists in Colorado: A prospective observational study reveals differences between surgical specialties
title_fullStr Suboptimal compliance with surgical safety checklists in Colorado: A prospective observational study reveals differences between surgical specialties
title_full_unstemmed Suboptimal compliance with surgical safety checklists in Colorado: A prospective observational study reveals differences between surgical specialties
title_short Suboptimal compliance with surgical safety checklists in Colorado: A prospective observational study reveals differences between surgical specialties
title_sort suboptimal compliance with surgical safety checklists in colorado: a prospective observational study reveals differences between surgical specialties
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4312457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25642287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-014-0056-z
work_keys_str_mv AT bifflwalterl suboptimalcompliancewithsurgicalsafetychecklistsincoloradoaprospectiveobservationalstudyrevealsdifferencesbetweensurgicalspecialties
AT gallagherannaleew suboptimalcompliancewithsurgicalsafetychecklistsincoloradoaprospectiveobservationalstudyrevealsdifferencesbetweensurgicalspecialties
AT pieraccifredricm suboptimalcompliancewithsurgicalsafetychecklistsincoloradoaprospectiveobservationalstudyrevealsdifferencesbetweensurgicalspecialties
AT berumencrystal suboptimalcompliancewithsurgicalsafetychecklistsincoloradoaprospectiveobservationalstudyrevealsdifferencesbetweensurgicalspecialties