Cargando…

Mechanical behavior of single-layer ceramized zirconia abutments for dental implant prosthetic rehabilitation

Objectives: This study was undertaken to characterize the mechanical response of bare (as-received) and single-layer ceramized zirconia abutments with both internal and external connections that have been developed to enhanced aesthetic restorations. Material and Methods: Sixteen zirconia implant ab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiménez-Melendo, Manuel, Llena-Blasco, Oriol, Bruguera, August, Llena-Blasco, Jaime, Yáñez-Vico, Rosa-María, García-Calderón, Manuel, Vaquero-Aguilar, Cristina, Velázquez-Cayón, Rocío, Gutiérrez-Pérez, José-Luis, Torres-Lagares, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4312673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25674313
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.51442
Descripción
Sumario:Objectives: This study was undertaken to characterize the mechanical response of bare (as-received) and single-layer ceramized zirconia abutments with both internal and external connections that have been developed to enhanced aesthetic restorations. Material and Methods: Sixteen zirconia implant abutments (ZiReal Post®, Biomet 3i, USA) with internal and external connections have been analyzed. Half of the specimens were coated with a 0.5mm-thick layer of a low-fusing fluroapatite ceramic. Mechanical tests were carried out under static (constant cross-head speed of 1mm/min until fracture) and dynamic (between 100 and 400N at a frequency of 1Hz) loading conditions. The failure location was identified by electron microscopy. The removal torque of the retaining screws after testing was also evaluated. Results: The average fracture strength was above 300N for all the abutments, regardless of connection geometry and coating. In most of the cases (94%), failure occurred by abutment fracture. No significant differences were observed either in fatigue behavior and removal torque between the different abutment groups. Conclusions: Mechanical behavior of Zireal zirconia abutments is independent of the type of internal/external connection and the presence/absence of ceramic coating. This may be clinically valuable in dental rehabilitation to improve the aesthetic outcome of zirconia-based dental implant systems. Key words:Dental implant, zirconia, ceramic structure, mechanical properties.