Cargando…
Automated antibody structure prediction using Accelrys tools: Results and best practices
We describe the methodology and results from our participation in the second Antibody Modeling Assessment experiment. During the experiment we predicted the structure of eleven unpublished antibody Fv fragments. Our prediction methods centered on template-based modeling; potential templates were sel...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BlackWell Publishing Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4312887/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24833271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prot.24604 |
_version_ | 1782355171372695552 |
---|---|
author | Fasnacht, Marc Butenhof, Ken Goupil-Lamy, Anne Hernandez-Guzman, Francisco Huang, Hongwei Yan, Lisa |
author_facet | Fasnacht, Marc Butenhof, Ken Goupil-Lamy, Anne Hernandez-Guzman, Francisco Huang, Hongwei Yan, Lisa |
author_sort | Fasnacht, Marc |
collection | PubMed |
description | We describe the methodology and results from our participation in the second Antibody Modeling Assessment experiment. During the experiment we predicted the structure of eleven unpublished antibody Fv fragments. Our prediction methods centered on template-based modeling; potential templates were selected from an antibody database based on their sequence similarity to the target in the framework regions. Depending on the quality of the templates, we constructed models of the antibody framework regions either using a single, chimeric or multiple template approach. The hypervariable loop regions in the initial models were rebuilt by grafting the corresponding regions from suitable templates onto the model. For the H3 loop region, we further refined models using ab initio methods. The final models were subjected to constrained energy minimization to resolve severe local structural problems. The analysis of the models submitted show that Accelrys tools allow for the construction of quite accurate models for the framework and the canonical CDR regions, with RMSDs to the X-ray structure on average below 1 Å for most of these regions. The results show that accurate prediction of the H3 hypervariable loops remains a challenge. Furthermore, model quality assessment of the submitted models show that the models are of quite high quality, with local geometry assessment scores similar to that of the target X-ray structures. Proteins 2014; 82:1583–1598. © 2014 The Authors. Proteins published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4312887 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BlackWell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43128872015-02-10 Automated antibody structure prediction using Accelrys tools: Results and best practices Fasnacht, Marc Butenhof, Ken Goupil-Lamy, Anne Hernandez-Guzman, Francisco Huang, Hongwei Yan, Lisa Proteins Article We describe the methodology and results from our participation in the second Antibody Modeling Assessment experiment. During the experiment we predicted the structure of eleven unpublished antibody Fv fragments. Our prediction methods centered on template-based modeling; potential templates were selected from an antibody database based on their sequence similarity to the target in the framework regions. Depending on the quality of the templates, we constructed models of the antibody framework regions either using a single, chimeric or multiple template approach. The hypervariable loop regions in the initial models were rebuilt by grafting the corresponding regions from suitable templates onto the model. For the H3 loop region, we further refined models using ab initio methods. The final models were subjected to constrained energy minimization to resolve severe local structural problems. The analysis of the models submitted show that Accelrys tools allow for the construction of quite accurate models for the framework and the canonical CDR regions, with RMSDs to the X-ray structure on average below 1 Å for most of these regions. The results show that accurate prediction of the H3 hypervariable loops remains a challenge. Furthermore, model quality assessment of the submitted models show that the models are of quite high quality, with local geometry assessment scores similar to that of the target X-ray structures. Proteins 2014; 82:1583–1598. © 2014 The Authors. Proteins published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014-08 2014-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4312887/ /pubmed/24833271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prot.24604 Text en © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Article Fasnacht, Marc Butenhof, Ken Goupil-Lamy, Anne Hernandez-Guzman, Francisco Huang, Hongwei Yan, Lisa Automated antibody structure prediction using Accelrys tools: Results and best practices |
title | Automated antibody structure prediction using Accelrys tools: Results and best practices |
title_full | Automated antibody structure prediction using Accelrys tools: Results and best practices |
title_fullStr | Automated antibody structure prediction using Accelrys tools: Results and best practices |
title_full_unstemmed | Automated antibody structure prediction using Accelrys tools: Results and best practices |
title_short | Automated antibody structure prediction using Accelrys tools: Results and best practices |
title_sort | automated antibody structure prediction using accelrys tools: results and best practices |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4312887/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24833271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prot.24604 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fasnachtmarc automatedantibodystructurepredictionusingaccelrystoolsresultsandbestpractices AT butenhofken automatedantibodystructurepredictionusingaccelrystoolsresultsandbestpractices AT goupillamyanne automatedantibodystructurepredictionusingaccelrystoolsresultsandbestpractices AT hernandezguzmanfrancisco automatedantibodystructurepredictionusingaccelrystoolsresultsandbestpractices AT huanghongwei automatedantibodystructurepredictionusingaccelrystoolsresultsandbestpractices AT yanlisa automatedantibodystructurepredictionusingaccelrystoolsresultsandbestpractices |