Cargando…

Randomized multicentre trial of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI versus conventional MRI or CT in the staging of colorectal cancer liver metastases

BACKGROUND: This multicentre international randomized trial compared the impact of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), MRI with extracellular contrast medium (ECCM-MRI) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) as a first-line imaging method in patients with suspected c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zech, C J, Korpraphong, P, Huppertz, A, Denecke, T, Kim, M-J, Tanomkiat, W, Jonas, E, Ba-Ssalamah, A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4312911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24652690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9465
_version_ 1782355175873183744
author Zech, C J
Korpraphong, P
Huppertz, A
Denecke, T
Kim, M-J
Tanomkiat, W
Jonas, E
Ba-Ssalamah, A
author_facet Zech, C J
Korpraphong, P
Huppertz, A
Denecke, T
Kim, M-J
Tanomkiat, W
Jonas, E
Ba-Ssalamah, A
author_sort Zech, C J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This multicentre international randomized trial compared the impact of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), MRI with extracellular contrast medium (ECCM-MRI) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) as a first-line imaging method in patients with suspected colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM). METHODS: Between October 2008 and September 2010, patients with suspected CRCLM were randomized to one of the three imaging modalities. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients for whom further imaging after initial imaging was required for a confident diagnosis. Secondary variables included confidence in the therapeutic decision, intraoperative deviations from the initial imaging-based surgical plan as a result of additional operative findings, and diagnostic efficacy of the imaging modalities versus intraoperative and pathological extent of the disease. RESULTS: A total of 360 patients were enrolled. Efficacy was analysed in 342 patients (118, 112 and 112 with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, ECCM-MRI and CE-CT respectively as the initial imaging procedure). Further imaging was required in 0 of 118, 19 (17·0 per cent) of 112 and 44 (39·3 per cent) of 112 patients respectively (P < 0·001). Diagnostic confidence was high or very high in 98·3 per cent of patients for gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, 85·7 per cent for ECCM-MRI and 65·2 per cent for CE-CT. Surgical plans were changed during surgery in 28, 32 and 47 per cent of patients in the respective groups. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI was better than that of CE-CT and ECCM-MRI as the initial imaging modality. No further imaging was needed in the gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI group and comparison of diagnostic efficacy parameters demonstrated the diagnostic superiority of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. Registration number: NCT00764621(http://clinicaltrials.gov); EudraCT number: 2008-000583-16 (https://eudract.ema.europa.eu/).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4312911
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43129112015-02-10 Randomized multicentre trial of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI versus conventional MRI or CT in the staging of colorectal cancer liver metastases Zech, C J Korpraphong, P Huppertz, A Denecke, T Kim, M-J Tanomkiat, W Jonas, E Ba-Ssalamah, A Br J Surg Randomized Clinical Trial BACKGROUND: This multicentre international randomized trial compared the impact of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), MRI with extracellular contrast medium (ECCM-MRI) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) as a first-line imaging method in patients with suspected colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM). METHODS: Between October 2008 and September 2010, patients with suspected CRCLM were randomized to one of the three imaging modalities. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients for whom further imaging after initial imaging was required for a confident diagnosis. Secondary variables included confidence in the therapeutic decision, intraoperative deviations from the initial imaging-based surgical plan as a result of additional operative findings, and diagnostic efficacy of the imaging modalities versus intraoperative and pathological extent of the disease. RESULTS: A total of 360 patients were enrolled. Efficacy was analysed in 342 patients (118, 112 and 112 with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, ECCM-MRI and CE-CT respectively as the initial imaging procedure). Further imaging was required in 0 of 118, 19 (17·0 per cent) of 112 and 44 (39·3 per cent) of 112 patients respectively (P < 0·001). Diagnostic confidence was high or very high in 98·3 per cent of patients for gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, 85·7 per cent for ECCM-MRI and 65·2 per cent for CE-CT. Surgical plans were changed during surgery in 28, 32 and 47 per cent of patients in the respective groups. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI was better than that of CE-CT and ECCM-MRI as the initial imaging modality. No further imaging was needed in the gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI group and comparison of diagnostic efficacy parameters demonstrated the diagnostic superiority of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. Registration number: NCT00764621(http://clinicaltrials.gov); EudraCT number: 2008-000583-16 (https://eudract.ema.europa.eu/). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2014-05 2014-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4312911/ /pubmed/24652690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9465 Text en © 2014 The Authors. BJS published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJS Society Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of theCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Randomized Clinical Trial
Zech, C J
Korpraphong, P
Huppertz, A
Denecke, T
Kim, M-J
Tanomkiat, W
Jonas, E
Ba-Ssalamah, A
Randomized multicentre trial of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI versus conventional MRI or CT in the staging of colorectal cancer liver metastases
title Randomized multicentre trial of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI versus conventional MRI or CT in the staging of colorectal cancer liver metastases
title_full Randomized multicentre trial of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI versus conventional MRI or CT in the staging of colorectal cancer liver metastases
title_fullStr Randomized multicentre trial of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI versus conventional MRI or CT in the staging of colorectal cancer liver metastases
title_full_unstemmed Randomized multicentre trial of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI versus conventional MRI or CT in the staging of colorectal cancer liver metastases
title_short Randomized multicentre trial of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI versus conventional MRI or CT in the staging of colorectal cancer liver metastases
title_sort randomized multicentre trial of gadoxetic acid-enhanced mri versus conventional mri or ct in the staging of colorectal cancer liver metastases
topic Randomized Clinical Trial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4312911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24652690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9465
work_keys_str_mv AT zechcj randomizedmulticentretrialofgadoxeticacidenhancedmriversusconventionalmriorctinthestagingofcolorectalcancerlivermetastases
AT korpraphongp randomizedmulticentretrialofgadoxeticacidenhancedmriversusconventionalmriorctinthestagingofcolorectalcancerlivermetastases
AT huppertza randomizedmulticentretrialofgadoxeticacidenhancedmriversusconventionalmriorctinthestagingofcolorectalcancerlivermetastases
AT denecket randomizedmulticentretrialofgadoxeticacidenhancedmriversusconventionalmriorctinthestagingofcolorectalcancerlivermetastases
AT kimmj randomizedmulticentretrialofgadoxeticacidenhancedmriversusconventionalmriorctinthestagingofcolorectalcancerlivermetastases
AT tanomkiatw randomizedmulticentretrialofgadoxeticacidenhancedmriversusconventionalmriorctinthestagingofcolorectalcancerlivermetastases
AT jonase randomizedmulticentretrialofgadoxeticacidenhancedmriversusconventionalmriorctinthestagingofcolorectalcancerlivermetastases
AT bassalamaha randomizedmulticentretrialofgadoxeticacidenhancedmriversusconventionalmriorctinthestagingofcolorectalcancerlivermetastases
AT randomizedmulticentretrialofgadoxeticacidenhancedmriversusconventionalmriorctinthestagingofcolorectalcancerlivermetastases