Cargando…

Instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in surgical treatment of recurrent disc herniation

Background: The incidence of recurrence in patients undergoing primary discectomy due to lumbar disc herniation (LDH), is regularly reported as 5-15%. In this study we aimed to evaluate surgical outcome of instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in the patients suffering from recu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Omidi-Kashani, Farzad, Ghayem Hasankhani, Ebrahim, Noroozi, Hamid Reza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iran University of Medical Sciences 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4313449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25679003
_version_ 1782355218230411264
author Omidi-Kashani, Farzad
Ghayem Hasankhani, Ebrahim
Noroozi, Hamid Reza
author_facet Omidi-Kashani, Farzad
Ghayem Hasankhani, Ebrahim
Noroozi, Hamid Reza
author_sort Omidi-Kashani, Farzad
collection PubMed
description Background: The incidence of recurrence in patients undergoing primary discectomy due to lumbar disc herniation (LDH), is regularly reported as 5-15%. In this study we aimed to evaluate surgical outcome of instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in the patients suffering from recurrent LDH. Methods: We retrospectively studied 51 patients (30 female, 21 male) from August 2007 to October 2011. The mean age and follow-up of the patients was 46.4±14.8 (ranged; 29-77 years old) and 31.4±6.8 (ranged; 25-50 months), respectively. Clinical improvement was assessed by Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analogue scale (VAS), and subjective satisfaction rate, while fusion was appraised radiologically. Data analysis was by one sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov, paired t, and Mann-Whitney tests. Results: Surgery could significantly improve mean leg and lumbar VAS and ODI from preoperative 7.4±2.5, 7.8±3.1, and 72.1±21.5 to postoperative 3.4±3.6, 3.5±2.6, and 27.5±18.0, respectively at the last follow-up visit. Subjective satisfaction rate was excellent in 24 patients (47.1%), good in 14 (27.5%), fair 11 (21.6%), and poor in two (3.9%). We had one patient with iatrogenic partial L5 nerve root injury and one with unknown late onset refractory postoperative back pain. Fusion rate was 100% and instrument failure was nil. Conclusion: In surgical treatment of the patients with recurrent LDH, bilaterally instrumented TLIF is a relatively safe and effective procedure and can be associated with least instrument failure and highest fusion rate while no postoperative bracing is also needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4313449
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Iran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43134492015-02-12 Instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in surgical treatment of recurrent disc herniation Omidi-Kashani, Farzad Ghayem Hasankhani, Ebrahim Noroozi, Hamid Reza Med J Islam Repub Iran Original Article Background: The incidence of recurrence in patients undergoing primary discectomy due to lumbar disc herniation (LDH), is regularly reported as 5-15%. In this study we aimed to evaluate surgical outcome of instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in the patients suffering from recurrent LDH. Methods: We retrospectively studied 51 patients (30 female, 21 male) from August 2007 to October 2011. The mean age and follow-up of the patients was 46.4±14.8 (ranged; 29-77 years old) and 31.4±6.8 (ranged; 25-50 months), respectively. Clinical improvement was assessed by Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analogue scale (VAS), and subjective satisfaction rate, while fusion was appraised radiologically. Data analysis was by one sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov, paired t, and Mann-Whitney tests. Results: Surgery could significantly improve mean leg and lumbar VAS and ODI from preoperative 7.4±2.5, 7.8±3.1, and 72.1±21.5 to postoperative 3.4±3.6, 3.5±2.6, and 27.5±18.0, respectively at the last follow-up visit. Subjective satisfaction rate was excellent in 24 patients (47.1%), good in 14 (27.5%), fair 11 (21.6%), and poor in two (3.9%). We had one patient with iatrogenic partial L5 nerve root injury and one with unknown late onset refractory postoperative back pain. Fusion rate was 100% and instrument failure was nil. Conclusion: In surgical treatment of the patients with recurrent LDH, bilaterally instrumented TLIF is a relatively safe and effective procedure and can be associated with least instrument failure and highest fusion rate while no postoperative bracing is also needed. Iran University of Medical Sciences 2014-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4313449/ /pubmed/25679003 Text en © 2014 Iran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Omidi-Kashani, Farzad
Ghayem Hasankhani, Ebrahim
Noroozi, Hamid Reza
Instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in surgical treatment of recurrent disc herniation
title Instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in surgical treatment of recurrent disc herniation
title_full Instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in surgical treatment of recurrent disc herniation
title_fullStr Instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in surgical treatment of recurrent disc herniation
title_full_unstemmed Instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in surgical treatment of recurrent disc herniation
title_short Instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in surgical treatment of recurrent disc herniation
title_sort instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in surgical treatment of recurrent disc herniation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4313449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25679003
work_keys_str_mv AT omidikashanifarzad instrumentedtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusioninsurgicaltreatmentofrecurrentdischerniation
AT ghayemhasankhaniebrahim instrumentedtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusioninsurgicaltreatmentofrecurrentdischerniation
AT noroozihamidreza instrumentedtransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusioninsurgicaltreatmentofrecurrentdischerniation