Cargando…

A randomized control clinical trial of fissure sealant retention: Self etch adhesive versus total etch adhesive

CONTEXT: There are limited studies on comparison of Total etch (TE) and Self etch (SE) adhesive for placement of sealants. AIMS: The aim of the study was to compare the retention of fissure sealants placed using TE adhesive to those sealants placed using SE (seventh generation) adhesive. SETTINGS AN...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aman, Nadia, Khan, Farhan Reza, Salim, Aisha, Farid, Huma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4313473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25657521
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.148883
_version_ 1782355223951441920
author Aman, Nadia
Khan, Farhan Reza
Salim, Aisha
Farid, Huma
author_facet Aman, Nadia
Khan, Farhan Reza
Salim, Aisha
Farid, Huma
author_sort Aman, Nadia
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: There are limited studies on comparison of Total etch (TE) and Self etch (SE) adhesive for placement of sealants. AIMS: The aim of the study was to compare the retention of fissure sealants placed using TE adhesive to those sealants placed using SE (seventh generation) adhesive. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: The study was conducted in the dental section, Aga Khan University Hospital. This study was a randomized single blinded trial with a split mouth design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 37 patients, 101 teeth were included in both study groups. The intervention arm was treated with SE Adhesive (Adper Easy One, 3M ESPE, US). Control arm received TE adhesive (Adper Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE, US) before sealant application. The patients were followed after 6 months for assessment of sealant retention. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Interexaminer agreement for outcome assessment was assessed by Kappa Statistics and outcome in intervention group was assessed by McNemar's test. RESULTS: Ninety-one pairs of molar (90%) were reevaluated for sealant retention. Complete retention was 56% in TE arm and 28% in SE arm with an odds ratio (OR) of 3.7. CONCLUSIONS: Sealants applied with TE adhesives show higher rate of complete sealant retention than SE adhesive.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4313473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43134732015-02-05 A randomized control clinical trial of fissure sealant retention: Self etch adhesive versus total etch adhesive Aman, Nadia Khan, Farhan Reza Salim, Aisha Farid, Huma J Conserv Dent Original Article CONTEXT: There are limited studies on comparison of Total etch (TE) and Self etch (SE) adhesive for placement of sealants. AIMS: The aim of the study was to compare the retention of fissure sealants placed using TE adhesive to those sealants placed using SE (seventh generation) adhesive. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: The study was conducted in the dental section, Aga Khan University Hospital. This study was a randomized single blinded trial with a split mouth design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 37 patients, 101 teeth were included in both study groups. The intervention arm was treated with SE Adhesive (Adper Easy One, 3M ESPE, US). Control arm received TE adhesive (Adper Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE, US) before sealant application. The patients were followed after 6 months for assessment of sealant retention. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Interexaminer agreement for outcome assessment was assessed by Kappa Statistics and outcome in intervention group was assessed by McNemar's test. RESULTS: Ninety-one pairs of molar (90%) were reevaluated for sealant retention. Complete retention was 56% in TE arm and 28% in SE arm with an odds ratio (OR) of 3.7. CONCLUSIONS: Sealants applied with TE adhesives show higher rate of complete sealant retention than SE adhesive. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4313473/ /pubmed/25657521 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.148883 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Aman, Nadia
Khan, Farhan Reza
Salim, Aisha
Farid, Huma
A randomized control clinical trial of fissure sealant retention: Self etch adhesive versus total etch adhesive
title A randomized control clinical trial of fissure sealant retention: Self etch adhesive versus total etch adhesive
title_full A randomized control clinical trial of fissure sealant retention: Self etch adhesive versus total etch adhesive
title_fullStr A randomized control clinical trial of fissure sealant retention: Self etch adhesive versus total etch adhesive
title_full_unstemmed A randomized control clinical trial of fissure sealant retention: Self etch adhesive versus total etch adhesive
title_short A randomized control clinical trial of fissure sealant retention: Self etch adhesive versus total etch adhesive
title_sort randomized control clinical trial of fissure sealant retention: self etch adhesive versus total etch adhesive
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4313473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25657521
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.148883
work_keys_str_mv AT amannadia arandomizedcontrolclinicaltrialoffissuresealantretentionselfetchadhesiveversustotaletchadhesive
AT khanfarhanreza arandomizedcontrolclinicaltrialoffissuresealantretentionselfetchadhesiveversustotaletchadhesive
AT salimaisha arandomizedcontrolclinicaltrialoffissuresealantretentionselfetchadhesiveversustotaletchadhesive
AT faridhuma arandomizedcontrolclinicaltrialoffissuresealantretentionselfetchadhesiveversustotaletchadhesive
AT amannadia randomizedcontrolclinicaltrialoffissuresealantretentionselfetchadhesiveversustotaletchadhesive
AT khanfarhanreza randomizedcontrolclinicaltrialoffissuresealantretentionselfetchadhesiveversustotaletchadhesive
AT salimaisha randomizedcontrolclinicaltrialoffissuresealantretentionselfetchadhesiveversustotaletchadhesive
AT faridhuma randomizedcontrolclinicaltrialoffissuresealantretentionselfetchadhesiveversustotaletchadhesive