Cargando…
A randomized control clinical trial of fissure sealant retention: Self etch adhesive versus total etch adhesive
CONTEXT: There are limited studies on comparison of Total etch (TE) and Self etch (SE) adhesive for placement of sealants. AIMS: The aim of the study was to compare the retention of fissure sealants placed using TE adhesive to those sealants placed using SE (seventh generation) adhesive. SETTINGS AN...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4313473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25657521 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.148883 |
_version_ | 1782355223951441920 |
---|---|
author | Aman, Nadia Khan, Farhan Reza Salim, Aisha Farid, Huma |
author_facet | Aman, Nadia Khan, Farhan Reza Salim, Aisha Farid, Huma |
author_sort | Aman, Nadia |
collection | PubMed |
description | CONTEXT: There are limited studies on comparison of Total etch (TE) and Self etch (SE) adhesive for placement of sealants. AIMS: The aim of the study was to compare the retention of fissure sealants placed using TE adhesive to those sealants placed using SE (seventh generation) adhesive. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: The study was conducted in the dental section, Aga Khan University Hospital. This study was a randomized single blinded trial with a split mouth design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 37 patients, 101 teeth were included in both study groups. The intervention arm was treated with SE Adhesive (Adper Easy One, 3M ESPE, US). Control arm received TE adhesive (Adper Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE, US) before sealant application. The patients were followed after 6 months for assessment of sealant retention. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Interexaminer agreement for outcome assessment was assessed by Kappa Statistics and outcome in intervention group was assessed by McNemar's test. RESULTS: Ninety-one pairs of molar (90%) were reevaluated for sealant retention. Complete retention was 56% in TE arm and 28% in SE arm with an odds ratio (OR) of 3.7. CONCLUSIONS: Sealants applied with TE adhesives show higher rate of complete sealant retention than SE adhesive. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4313473 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43134732015-02-05 A randomized control clinical trial of fissure sealant retention: Self etch adhesive versus total etch adhesive Aman, Nadia Khan, Farhan Reza Salim, Aisha Farid, Huma J Conserv Dent Original Article CONTEXT: There are limited studies on comparison of Total etch (TE) and Self etch (SE) adhesive for placement of sealants. AIMS: The aim of the study was to compare the retention of fissure sealants placed using TE adhesive to those sealants placed using SE (seventh generation) adhesive. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: The study was conducted in the dental section, Aga Khan University Hospital. This study was a randomized single blinded trial with a split mouth design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 37 patients, 101 teeth were included in both study groups. The intervention arm was treated with SE Adhesive (Adper Easy One, 3M ESPE, US). Control arm received TE adhesive (Adper Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE, US) before sealant application. The patients were followed after 6 months for assessment of sealant retention. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Interexaminer agreement for outcome assessment was assessed by Kappa Statistics and outcome in intervention group was assessed by McNemar's test. RESULTS: Ninety-one pairs of molar (90%) were reevaluated for sealant retention. Complete retention was 56% in TE arm and 28% in SE arm with an odds ratio (OR) of 3.7. CONCLUSIONS: Sealants applied with TE adhesives show higher rate of complete sealant retention than SE adhesive. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4313473/ /pubmed/25657521 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.148883 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Aman, Nadia Khan, Farhan Reza Salim, Aisha Farid, Huma A randomized control clinical trial of fissure sealant retention: Self etch adhesive versus total etch adhesive |
title | A randomized control clinical trial of fissure sealant retention: Self etch adhesive versus total etch adhesive |
title_full | A randomized control clinical trial of fissure sealant retention: Self etch adhesive versus total etch adhesive |
title_fullStr | A randomized control clinical trial of fissure sealant retention: Self etch adhesive versus total etch adhesive |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomized control clinical trial of fissure sealant retention: Self etch adhesive versus total etch adhesive |
title_short | A randomized control clinical trial of fissure sealant retention: Self etch adhesive versus total etch adhesive |
title_sort | randomized control clinical trial of fissure sealant retention: self etch adhesive versus total etch adhesive |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4313473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25657521 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.148883 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT amannadia arandomizedcontrolclinicaltrialoffissuresealantretentionselfetchadhesiveversustotaletchadhesive AT khanfarhanreza arandomizedcontrolclinicaltrialoffissuresealantretentionselfetchadhesiveversustotaletchadhesive AT salimaisha arandomizedcontrolclinicaltrialoffissuresealantretentionselfetchadhesiveversustotaletchadhesive AT faridhuma arandomizedcontrolclinicaltrialoffissuresealantretentionselfetchadhesiveversustotaletchadhesive AT amannadia randomizedcontrolclinicaltrialoffissuresealantretentionselfetchadhesiveversustotaletchadhesive AT khanfarhanreza randomizedcontrolclinicaltrialoffissuresealantretentionselfetchadhesiveversustotaletchadhesive AT salimaisha randomizedcontrolclinicaltrialoffissuresealantretentionselfetchadhesiveversustotaletchadhesive AT faridhuma randomizedcontrolclinicaltrialoffissuresealantretentionselfetchadhesiveversustotaletchadhesive |