Cargando…

Ecophysiological responses to different forest patch type of two codominant tree seedlings

According to gap-phase dynamics theory, forests can be divided into four distinct patch types: gap patch (G), building patch (B), mature patch (M), and degeneration patch (D). Varying light conditions across patch types are one of the most important factors affecting the coexistence of vegetation. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duan, Renyan, Huang, Minyi, Kong, Xiaoquan, Wang, Zhigao, Fan, Weiyi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4314260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25691956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1368
_version_ 1782355314753929216
author Duan, Renyan
Huang, Minyi
Kong, Xiaoquan
Wang, Zhigao
Fan, Weiyi
author_facet Duan, Renyan
Huang, Minyi
Kong, Xiaoquan
Wang, Zhigao
Fan, Weiyi
author_sort Duan, Renyan
collection PubMed
description According to gap-phase dynamics theory, forests can be divided into four distinct patch types: gap patch (G), building patch (B), mature patch (M), and degeneration patch (D). Varying light conditions across patch types are one of the most important factors affecting the coexistence of vegetation. Mechanisms of coexistence can be understood through detailed knowledge of ecophysiological responses of codominant tree seedlings to patch types. The following study was conducted to determine ecophysiological responses of Cyclobalanopsis glauca (an evergreen broad-leaved species) and Bothrocaryum controversum (a deciduous broad-leaved species) to four different patch types. During the gap-phase dynamics, light intensity and the magnitude of change in the four different patches followed the order of: G > B > D > M. Both species had the greatest photosynthetic capacity in the G patch. Dry leaf mass per area (LMA), Chlorophyll a + b concentration (Chl), carotenoids (Car), and nitrogen content per area (N(a)) all responded to changes in light across patch type, but B. controversum showed greater sensitivity and changes than C. glauca. From G to M patch, the maximal quantum efficiency of PSII (F(v)/F(m)) had a larger variation magnitude for B. controversum than for C. glauca. From G to M patch, B. controversum showed significant changes in gas exchange, while C. glauca showed only small changes. Ecophysiological trait partitioning of response to light in different patches provides a possible explanation of a coexistence mechanism.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4314260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BlackWell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43142602015-02-17 Ecophysiological responses to different forest patch type of two codominant tree seedlings Duan, Renyan Huang, Minyi Kong, Xiaoquan Wang, Zhigao Fan, Weiyi Ecol Evol Original Research According to gap-phase dynamics theory, forests can be divided into four distinct patch types: gap patch (G), building patch (B), mature patch (M), and degeneration patch (D). Varying light conditions across patch types are one of the most important factors affecting the coexistence of vegetation. Mechanisms of coexistence can be understood through detailed knowledge of ecophysiological responses of codominant tree seedlings to patch types. The following study was conducted to determine ecophysiological responses of Cyclobalanopsis glauca (an evergreen broad-leaved species) and Bothrocaryum controversum (a deciduous broad-leaved species) to four different patch types. During the gap-phase dynamics, light intensity and the magnitude of change in the four different patches followed the order of: G > B > D > M. Both species had the greatest photosynthetic capacity in the G patch. Dry leaf mass per area (LMA), Chlorophyll a + b concentration (Chl), carotenoids (Car), and nitrogen content per area (N(a)) all responded to changes in light across patch type, but B. controversum showed greater sensitivity and changes than C. glauca. From G to M patch, the maximal quantum efficiency of PSII (F(v)/F(m)) had a larger variation magnitude for B. controversum than for C. glauca. From G to M patch, B. controversum showed significant changes in gas exchange, while C. glauca showed only small changes. Ecophysiological trait partitioning of response to light in different patches provides a possible explanation of a coexistence mechanism. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015-01 2014-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4314260/ /pubmed/25691956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1368 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Duan, Renyan
Huang, Minyi
Kong, Xiaoquan
Wang, Zhigao
Fan, Weiyi
Ecophysiological responses to different forest patch type of two codominant tree seedlings
title Ecophysiological responses to different forest patch type of two codominant tree seedlings
title_full Ecophysiological responses to different forest patch type of two codominant tree seedlings
title_fullStr Ecophysiological responses to different forest patch type of two codominant tree seedlings
title_full_unstemmed Ecophysiological responses to different forest patch type of two codominant tree seedlings
title_short Ecophysiological responses to different forest patch type of two codominant tree seedlings
title_sort ecophysiological responses to different forest patch type of two codominant tree seedlings
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4314260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25691956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1368
work_keys_str_mv AT duanrenyan ecophysiologicalresponsestodifferentforestpatchtypeoftwocodominanttreeseedlings
AT huangminyi ecophysiologicalresponsestodifferentforestpatchtypeoftwocodominanttreeseedlings
AT kongxiaoquan ecophysiologicalresponsestodifferentforestpatchtypeoftwocodominanttreeseedlings
AT wangzhigao ecophysiologicalresponsestodifferentforestpatchtypeoftwocodominanttreeseedlings
AT fanweiyi ecophysiologicalresponsestodifferentforestpatchtypeoftwocodominanttreeseedlings